The health issue of obesity encapsulates a topic of controversy for many years now. As rates of obesity increase in children, teens, and adults, the problem of action arises. A specific question poses: should the U.S. government place regulations on Americans in order to combat obesity? The polarizing viewpoints form from the idea that controlling the food and exercise of people’s lives invades their privacy despite making them healthier and helping them to live longer. In my honest opinion, the answer to the aforementioned question is yes. This enveloped research discusses why and how America needs and shall receive greater government regulation on their standards of health, as well as the opposing stance to the inquiry and why the facts …show more content…
The grotesque amount of food purchases consumed by countless citizens explodes through the roof, with the nation as large as ever. Gone are the Renaissance days of plumpness being chic and desirable, since forth replaced by the yearning of health, fitness, and youth of the mind, body, and soul. However, these ideals hold little standings for the masses remain unhealthy. The supply and demand of ample quantities of foodstuffs veer people off the path of health and into the selfish world of delicious meals, snacks, and desserts. By placing restrictions on the magnitude of food consumed, overconsumption of food diminishes and obesity rates decline. Without as heavy a supply as previously allowed, consumers cannot consume, therefore fewer calories enter their bodies and turn into fat. If people remain inactive, they absolutely cannot eat the same amount of food as an Olympic swimmer because these calories possess no purpose and simply resonate as waste. All in all, less food means less fat and less fat means less obesity (The Experts). In order to do this, the government must push national eating guidelines for a healthy diet. The food pyramid did not receive enough endorsement so nobody followed it. Through constant reminders, advertisements, posters, and