Ontological arguments in favour of Existence of God:
The very first sentence of Ontological arguments describing that ‘God is a being by which no greater being can be imagined it is a conceptual truth’. It is extremely wrong because it can be easily criticised. Let me take a example, suppose “x” is something that describes a physical quantity. Then surely “2x” greater than “x” and “3x” greater than “2x” and so on. That means 2 God is greater than 1 God and 3 God is greater than 2 God and so on. So it can be simply disproved.
Also imagine a God of God which is greatest thing that God can be imagine then that becomes the supreme thing than God and this scenario will be continue this is happening because of fault in the logic used in this statement.
…show more content…
As I mentioned imagination has no limit marvellous than marvellous can be imagined think of a universe of universe which consist many universe like our universe containing many planets that can be more awesome than our universe.
The second sentence saying about the merit of creation is acceptable because it describing the factual information that we feel and that we sense. Creating something in much difficult situations always considered as big achievement. But now think of that does the not existence is greatest handicap? Imagine a fully paralysed person makes tea in Taj-Hotel and serves the customer is that not a great achievement? It totally seems to be unusual but think of this. Can we compare creating the world with, without existence and situation
…show more content…
God can exist without existence, God is everything but God is nothing, God is the highest parameter of something and also God has no parameters. We don’t have control on God and also we don’t have evidence in favour and in unfavoured of god we can only do that we can assume God or don’t. Everyone has his/her own definition of God. Did we analyse whole universe if so then did we understand outside the universe? If not then how we can say God physically not