In “Paparazzi Wars” the author states how there is a huge problem of photographers and other people harassing mostly children of famous celebrities. For example the child of Halle Berry who describes obsessed photographers at her daughter’s school, and she says, “They jump out bushes, they jump out of cars” (Cagle 4). This is just a little taste of how major the problem gets and even the author isn't happy with what is being. To express their feelings the author says, “As a journalist, I'm embarrassed by the behavior of some paparazzi, these jerks who would frighten a kid to get a rise out of her famous mom. At the same time, I'm also concerned by any legislation that could potentially chip away at the First Amendment” (Cagle 4). The author …show more content…
Garland agreed to do a series of specials with CBS, but didn't want to set a date for the first program. Torres was curious and decided to go to CBS and snoop around for some information about why Garland was avoiding to set a date. She talked to a CBS executor who was describing how something was bothering her and said, “I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's because she thinks she’s terribly fat” (Lewis 81). Garland sued for libel claiming that Torres should have to reveal her sources. Later Garland was able to prove that the libel was true, won the case, and revolutionized libel forever. This case can relate to the article “Paparazzi War” because even though they didn't harass child of Garland like the paparazzi did for Berry’s daughter, they still were asking around about her to see if they could get any information on her. They were trying to get Garland talking since she is so famous. Both the article and this specific case show what big problem paparazzi can be relating to harassing and violations of the First Amendment. “Paparazzi Wars” and Freedom For The Thought That We Hate reveal how bad photographers and other people that work in the reporting business can be by harassing celebrities, and they could even be breaking the First