ipl-logo

Moral Paradox Research Paper

795 Words4 Pages

In this paper I will argue the following. People face moral choices. Often these choices are hard, and a person will be torn between two options. Both options seem like they have an overwhelming reason behind them, but a choice is necessary. Some consider this to be a moral paradox. I will then argue that there is never a paradoxical moral choice.

To completely understand the alleged paradox, let us look at a hypothetical example. Pretend that there is a nuclear bomb in the middle of New York City and a terrorist group has threatened to detonate it, killing millions in the process, unless the president of the United States personally kills a baby on live television. While this is outlandish, the extreme nature of the situation emphasizes the …show more content…

It may be a difficult personal choice, but that does not imply there is a moral paradox. The other option is that the two choices are, on-balance, the same level of good or bad. This can also make for a difficult choice, but the moral system dictates that there is no immoral answer. A system of morality which is based solely on balanced judgements is the easiest way to debunk moral paradoxes, but it lacks a consistent set of personal values. It is a framework for individual morality. One person may feel that personally taking a life is worse than passively allowing millions to die, especially if they absolve themselves of blame and attribute those deaths solely to the terrorist group. That person would be wrong (in my opinion), but it does present an inconsistency in applying the system (although inconsistency is not a moral paradox). In the previous scenario where one person judged the choices to be the same level of good and bad, that may be viewed as a paradox. They have considered every possible argument and situation, but still the choices are even. The moral system says that there is no wrong answer, but that does not make it any easier to choose. This is an ethical dilemma, not a moral paradox. There is a logical premise with logical reasoning and the conclusion, while difficult to face, is perfectly

Show More
Related
676 Words | 3 Pages

Thinking with a humane mindset it is more ethical to continue to fight a long and hard struggle, rather than slaughter many innocent

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

A perfect example of this could be one of the stories featured in Margaret Atwood’s Bread. In this she spins a tale of a brutal famine in which there are two sisters, one sick and dying, and only a single piece of bread between them. The reader is then posed with a question of whether the healthier sister should share the bread, give it to her sister or keep it for herself. How this should be solved can be based on the ethical approaches discussed in the article, A Framework for Thinking Ethically. However, out of all the approaches, the Utilitarian and the Virtue ones would best suit the dilemma presented in Bread.

Read More
123 Words | 1 Pages

Euthyphro’s Dilemma is when Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Does God love goodness because it is good, or is it good because God loves it?” Euthyphro’s Dilemma is that God determines what is good and evil, right and wrong. This dilemma challenges the Divine Command theory because according to Euthyphro’s Dilemma we would be obligated to do something wrong because God commanded it. This conflicts with the Divine Command theory because it would imply that cruelty could be morally right if God told us to do so. The idea that cruelty can be morally right goes up against the belief in the Divine Command Theory because it proposes that an action's status that is morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God

Read More
1998 Words | 8 Pages

Harry Frankfurt’s paper titled Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility makes an argument in opposition to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. His viewpoints alter the perception of philosophical concepts like determinism and free will, and under what circumstances a person is morally responsible for their actions depending on the assumption they had options to make another choice. The principle that Frankfurt disputes is that of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, in which it is asserted that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they could have chosen to do otherwise. Common issues with the principle reside in its potential to expunge individuals of moral responsibility in instances where

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

In every day life, we face many situations that require a moral decision. We have to decide what is right and what is wrong? Not always is this an easy task thus, it seems important to analyze how we make our moral decisions. I will start with an analysis of how we make decisions in general

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

While pointing out that it is much easier to ignore an appeal for money to help those you’ll never meet than to consign a child to death, Singer uses his utilitarian philosophy to deflect the argument, stating that “if the upshot of the American’s failure to donate the money is that one more kid dies… then it is, in some sense, just as bad as selling the kid to the organ peddlers.” This argument, however, can only be made while using false dilemmas. Singer also addresses a large criticism of his work, that one can’t decide moral issues by taking opinion polls. The argument to this reiterates how the audience would feel being in these situations. This argument is poor as it does not address how the entire article is based on how everyone feels about this particular subject.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Some evidence that explains that the speaker did the right thing is, “ Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less traveled by,” (Frost 4). My evidence show that the speaker has thought about this more and saw that most people took the other road not even thinking about the path that their are going on, but the speaker thought about it and how that path would affect his life so that is why he chose to take the path that he took. The speaker found the courage to do the right thing from the road or path that less people are taking. Some evidence to back this up would be, “Then I took the other, as just as fair, and having perhaps the better claim, because it was grassy and wanted wear,” (Frost 2). My evidence explains that the other road was the road that had way less people had been taking.

Read More
198 Words | 1 Pages

Euthyphro Dilemma: A dilemma The Euthyphro dilemma consists of a question asked by Socrates in the Euthyphro text, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are will by God?” The problem of these two mindsets create is a running and leading to an unwanted answer, or nothing at all. What may the philosopher may choose or answer with, it may result with their answer proven wrong.

Read More
1196 Words | 5 Pages

Euthyphro’s dilemma is explained by Panos Dimas in his article when he says that if something is “loved by the gods….Socrates characterizes it as something that happens to it and therefore presupposes that the pious has already been constituted” (2). What this means is that we cannot be sure of what is good or bad because we do not know the real essence of what piety is. The basic question of the dilemma is: are morals considered ethical because the gods says so or do the gods say morals are ethical because they actually are? It is impossible to answer this question as the essence of what constitutes as good, bad, ethical and unethical is uncertain at best. Therefore it is impossible to say what good and bad really are.

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

When it comes to the philosopher that is mostly correct about the kinds of personal sacrifices that morality shouldn’t demand on us to make in the name of common good, it is Bernard Williams. He basically states that utilitarianism is too demanding upon us for the happiness of others, where we can’t even focus on the happiness of ourselves. Not only is a person responsible for the things they do in life, but they have to be responsible for the consequences of things that they don’t do in life that don’t bring the greatest happiness to everyone around them. Utilitarianism states that even if someone were to feel a negative way on a subject due to their values or morals, they should dismiss all personal feelings and emotions to promote general happiness. Williams disagrees and I as well disagree with that statement.

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Williams transitions from this example into the discussion of something he calls “the precedent effect”. The fear of this effect is that certain horrendous utilitarian acts might encourage people to behave immorally because of the precedent that may be set by these actions. Even though Williams admits that the precedent effect would only occur if people where confused as to why utilitarian’s had to commit a horrendous act, Williams believes that this confusion is a very real possibility if utilitarianism is ever used in

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

The main issue with Rachel's case relates to the relevance of such an example. I find two main mistakes in his idea: the first is the assumption that morally judging an act must be done independently of several factors. In this case, it is believed that intention and the possibility of saving the child don't have any importance. Here it is

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

In the movie Crimson Tide, we look to the question ethical decisions, and what someone would do when thrown into a situation that made them question themselves, and who they serve for. In this example, when serving in the United States Military, once a solider is given orders, that solider must follow the orders out and not to question them. The trust between the solider and the higher command giving orders is almost based on blind faith. The solider relies on the higher commands decision of protecting democracy, even if someone, or a lot of people are killed. Is it an ethical decision to follow a commander’s order even if it means killing mass numbers of innocent civilians?

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Consequential Ethical theory It is a part of normative ethical theories and it means that the consequence of ones behavior is an ultimate mean for anyone to judge the rightness or wrongness of that behavior. So, from the perspective of a consequentialist an ethically right act is the one that will inherit good outcome or consequence. It usually explains the saying “the end justifies the means” which means that in order to achieve a goal, take any route which leads to achieving it.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

In Carol Gilligan 's essay, "Concepts of Self and Morality," a college student answers the question of what morality should be by stating, "The basic idea that I cling to is the sanctity of human life" (171). When a woman decides to have an abortion, she overlooks the sanctity of human life and she forgets her morals. Therefore there should not be a question of choice in the matter of

Read More

More about Moral Paradox Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document