Throughout the journey two tales were told. They held very few similarities, and quite a few differences. These two tales were told by men from two completely different walks of life. One was a noble knight who won battles, put others before himself, and took great pride in his two most impressive horses. The other was a pardoner, who did not believe most of what he taught, conned people for their money, and knew how to put on a show to make the all the poor peasants believe every word he said. Both of their tales were quite interesting, but the knight did in fact tell a better story. The knights story captivated its readers by attaching them to its characters, making every failure, emotion, and success affect the reader personally, and by the end of the tale the reader was able to take away a lesson they would never forget. The knight's tale spoke of two brothers in arms, who had sworn a blood oath to protect each other, and die for eachother. However, when they both fell in love with the same woman, all the memories and promises of the past were gone. The two knights grew to hate each other more and more everyday. Finally a joust between the two was scheduled and the winner would get their bride and the other would leave empty handed. However, when an unexpected turn leaves one of the knights dead, the other realizes he had still …show more content…
Part of this is due to the length of the Pardoner’s tale. There was not a lot of time to develop a background story and really intice the readers before the ending of the story. It was also very low action when compared to the Knight’s tale. It did have some chasing, drunkenness, and murder, but again all these actions were such underdeveloped events that did not allow the reader to get emotionally invested. As a result of this, the Pardoner’s Tale did not entertain the reader as the Knight’s tale