In the year 2013 around June, Edward Snowden a now ex-contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) had decided to started a debate about mass surveillance. How did he make sure not only the United States, but the rest of the world also got into the debate? He posted or leaked out confidential government files. For every coin there are two sides. Some Americans believe that Snowden is a traitor to is country who revealed the United State’s Secrets to the enemy and should be put to trial for the miss deeds. Others believe that he is a musketeer, a hero, and a patriot who shed a lot of light behind the scenes of the government we the American people trusted to fallow our constitutional rights. According to Chris Soghoian a Principal Technologist for ACLU states that he NSA has two different types of surveillance. The first is dragnet surveillance that scans everyone’s communications. Then there is the second form which is targeted surveillance. So if the National Security Agency wanted to get in they can and there is no way of stopping them. So if one can not stop the NSA from getting into the devices we the people use everyday such as phones, computers, any social media, and chat-rooms then they know us just as well or even better then our own loved ones know us. This allows them to build what they call “a pattern of life” which is just a very …show more content…
One of the first documents to be published by the guardian was a court order showing that the NSA was collecting the phone records of millions of the United States customers of Verizon. That order was the main talk of debates. Even though that Senator Dianne Feinstein agreed with Snowden she had to protect the dignity of the NSA and stated “This is not surveillance, it does not collect any context of any communication”. Though we all know that is not