Tigers are magnificent creatures of the earth and why should government be able to put restrictions on what a person can do. Nowhere in the constitution of the united states does it say that a person does not have the right to own what they want to have. It says nowhere that a person cannot own an exotic animal. If it is not stated by the constitution the state does not have to follow a law that the federal government has made. The only restriction clearly stated in our Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms which can be taken away from someone if deemed necessary. The government has different category’s on their exotic animal restrictions such as B = Ban on private ownership of exotic animals — non-domesticated felines, wolves, bears, reptiles, non-human primates.
B* = Partial ban on private ownership of exotic animals — allows ownership of some exotic animals but precludes ownership of the animals listed.
L = Requires the "owner" of the exotic animal to obtain a license or permit or to register the animal with state or local authorities to privately possess the animal (excludes states only requiring import permits.
N = The state does not require the "owner" to obtain a license or permit to possess the animal within the
…show more content…
If a person has the money and time to care for an exotic animal why not let them have one. Exotic animals aren’t only beautiful but owning one can give you the responsibility and maturity to do anything. caring for such dangerous and exquisite creatures with make not only everything around you more interesting but will help you be able to complete any task. Exotic animals are not dangerous unless a person does not care for them properly. A dog can even become dangerous if not taken care of properly. Each day, about 1,000 U.S. citizens require emergency care treatment for dog bite