ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriage Equality

594 Words3 Pages

What's the issue concerning equality for same-sex couples? Recently this question has become one of the most controversial topics in North Carolina. And let's face it the issue isn't going to just disappear anytime soon. While conservatives protest the tide of change, the LGBT community rallies for progress. Although We live in an unprecedented time of transition and change the fact remains the legalization of gay marriage is now standing on the forefront of a national battlefield. The moral argument put forward by conservatives is that homosexuality is unnatural. Popular culture defines traditional marriage as a life-long commitment between a man and a woman. Conservatives argue that gay marriage undermines the institution of marriage and threatens ancient tradition. US District Court of Appeals Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton wrote that, Marriage has long been a social institution defined by relationships between men and women. So long defined, the tradition is measured in millennia, not centuries or decades. So widely shared, the tradition …show more content…

Same-sex couples simply want the benefits and recognition that is freely given to heterosexual couples. Marriage allows same sex couples to be recognized and protected under federal law. This recognition would also entitle same-sex couples the benefits offered to heterosexual couples. These benefits include life insurance eligibility, tax breaks and the deductions, and above all else being supported by the Federal Government. But without this basic human right the LGBT community will continue facing discrimination and

Show More
Related
1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More
88 Words | 1 Pages

In 2015, the United States Supreme Court worked on Obergefell v. Hodges, a case regarding the legality of same sex marriage. Over 9 million people in the united states identify and associate themselves with the LGBTQ+ community. These members and others in the past have fought for their constitutional rights since before the 1950’s. The legalization of same-sex marriage under the United States Constitution is beneficial to the nation, as it has positively influenced members of the LGBTQ+ community and their families, the nation’s economy, and it’s reputation.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

This analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

Summary of Articles: Article 1: The author, Jack Pitney, asserts that Same-Sex Marriage is a topic disagreed upon by Americans: whether it is an issue of legality in the Constitution, and whether it should be up to states or the federal government to make a decision. Pitney finds that the minority party in Congress has often sought to oppose legislation by the majority party citing that it should be a states’ rights issue. Yet, when there is a change in the majority, the once-minority party hypocritically defends the issue as being up to the national government. Most politicians prior to 2012 agreed that the issue of Same-Sex marriage was answered by DOMA (1996), and that a piece of legislation by the Federal Government would violate the powers defined in the Constitution. Article 2: Pew Research Center finds that opposition to homosexual marriage hit a high after Bill Clinton signed the DOMA (1996) and continued to remain high until 2007.

Read More
1594 Words | 7 Pages

The future of same-sex marriage has long been a question in the United States; on June 26, 2015, under the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v. Hodges, the country finally got an answer. In a five to four decision, the Supreme court determined that under the Fourteenth Amendment, marriage between same- sex couples is legal in all fifty states. Under this decision, states that had previously banned same-sex marriage will have to recognize and permit same-sex marriage within their boundaries. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is a landmark decision that will not affect same-sex couples throughout the nation, but also every aspect of our society. Having been hired by a sociologist who wants to study the effect of

Read More
1768 Words | 8 Pages

Same-sex marriages can help add more money to the wedding industry, it can help decrease cost of state benefits, it can add more revenue to the whole state, denying them the right to marry goes against the fourteenth amendment, it would be the right source of action since they face discrimination, denying someone the right to marry means that you are denying them happiness, religious leaders support it because it bring peace in the communities, they support it because they see everyone as God’s children and they support it because, in the bible, the term marriage meant just between two women and the term didn’t regard to gender. Same-sex marriages can very important essence to help boost the economy because it can help during times when a state is going through a crisis like they don’t have a lot of employment. Don’t have funds to improve communities or it can help the entire country fund into healthcare, education and---- which can improve some nay lives. Allowing a ban on same-sex marriage is a bad example towards the next generations of children. It’s teaching them that it’s ok to discriminate certain people.

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

In his article “For Gay Marriage,” Andrew Sullivan argues that homosexuals should be given the right to be legally married. Sullivan claims that homosexuals are just as deserving of marriage as heterosexuals are. Sullivan discusses how unethical it is to refrain a homosexual couple from marrying. He argues that legalizing gay marriage will promote a healthier environment for homosexuals by allowing young homosexuals, who have publicly announced their sexuality, to have role models. According to Sullivan, the legalization of gay marriage will help strengthen the bond between homosexuals and their parents.

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

Marx and Nietzsche both agreed that religion is unnecessary. Marx viewed religion as a form of dissent from the working class. He believed that using religion was an expression of the individual`s personal suffering. Therefore, humans made religion to run away from their daily problems, in the end creating more problems with the concept of religion itself. Marx viewed religion as something made by humans to provide reasoning and answers for their questions and desires.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Health insurance, estate taxes, family leave, and pensions are some of the issues that arise with benefits to name a few examples. Furthermore, I can see why these issues do come into the equation and because of that couples should be allowed to marry and have the same entitlements. Some of the questions in the post referred to if the laws were changed and domestic partners benefits did have equal rights in every state, would same-sex couples want to get married? My viewpoint on this is they would not have to get married then if it was only about the benefits and they could get them without marriage, however, that is not the answer because couples want to get married because they love each other, so that is not solving the whole issue.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

if people were denied the right to marry it is discrimination and created a second class of citizens (Gay Marriage ProCon.org, ProConorg Headlines.). The concept of “traditional marriage” has changed over time and the definition of marriage being between a man and a woman inaccurate (Gay Marriage ProCon.org, ProConorg Headlines.). Gay marriages bring financial aid to the federal, state, and local governments, and can boost the economy in a major way (Gay Marriage ProCon.org, ProConorg

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Former US President, Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) defines democracy in his Gettysburg Address delivered in 1864 as the government of the people, by the people and for the people” (Lincoln, 1864). Different authors have given several definition of the term. Among them is David Held, a renowned authority on the concept. He defined democracy as: “Democracy means a form of government in which, in contradistinction monarchies and aristocracies, the people rule.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Considering the political issues today same-sex marriage controversy serves to be significant as it has not been able to reach its height at the national level. As only 36 states out of 50 legally approve of same-sex marriage (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Amending the Constitution for same-sex marriage serves to be a huge controversy and a difficult process due to many opinions present within the political and social circuit. Another reason many citizens do not support the idea of same-sex marriage is due to traditional social beliefs and morals. For example, many Americans oppose the idea of same-sex marriage on religious grounds.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

Until recently, many states within the United States did not allow homosexual/LGBT couples to get married. Due to the fact that LGBT couples have not been recognized

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

My second reason for supporting LGBT/ same-sex marriage is the reason for discrimination against marriage. The UDHR article number 7 illustrates that all people are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination. Furthermore, article 1 of the UDHR also indicates that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. We should act towards one another in a spirit of a brother. By denying the same right as anybody else just because you are different is a clear form of discrimination, and it goes against the constitution.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

To most ears, it probably sounds inoffensive. A little outdated and clinical, perhaps, but harmless enough: homosexual. But that five-syllable word has never been more loaded, more deliberately used and, to the ears of many gays and lesbians, more permissiveness. Homosexual’ is the ring of ‘colored’ now, in the way your grandmother might have used that term, except that it hasn’t been recover in the same way. Consider the following phrases: homosexual community, homosexual activist, homosexual marriage.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriage Equality

Related Topics

Open Document