ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Impeachment

924 Words4 Pages

As most democratic nations in the world have a tripartite government, I would assume that to have a truly democratic state, there should be some separation of powers or checks-and-balances put in place. One system where checks-and-balances should be enacted is in the impeachment process. Each country has their own unique system for the procedure, with varying degrees of checks-and-balances.
To be clear, within the American system of government, "impeachment" simply means to bring up on charges, not to be removed from office, although removal from office might be the end result of an impeachment process. The constitution lays out the process for the removal of the President, The House of Representatives can vote to impeach the President, a federal judge, or other executive branch officials for what the Constitution calls "high crimes and misdemeanors." This Constitutional standard need not necessarily be for a violation of law, so at its roots the standard can be a political judgment. Traditionally, however, …show more content…

Compared to the American and Swedish system, the Romanian system appears more democratic. The people have a direct vote on whether or not they believe their leader should stay in office; whereas within the other two systems, the people must rely on their elected officials to make the decision for them. As a citizen, I would rather have a direct voice for the future of my country; if the President has been put up for impeachment, they have obviously done something (while in office, after the election) that warrants evaluation and judgement, I believe citizens should have a part in that decision. In addition, I like how the Parliament is involved initially, the legislative branch must first bring up charges and vote, with a majority needed for conviction, then the rest is up to the

Show More
Related
443 Words | 2 Pages

Instead, it ensures that impeachment is reserved for cases of severe misconduct or breaches of trust. Additionally, the House of Representatives, as the body responsible for initiating impeachment proceedings, acts as a check on potential abuses of power by requiring only a simple majority vote. In summary, the constitutional procedure for impeachment and removal strikes a delicate balance between holding the president accountable for their actions and preventing the process from being overly

Read More
168 Words | 1 Pages

Maureen Shaw, the author of "Becoming a Mother Made Me Even More Pro-Choice," clearly states her position in the moot of abortion. The main topic of her article is about how pro-life/anti-choice harms women and their child(ren) and why pro-choice should be more widely accepted. Shaw claims that pro-life supporters misconstrue women who get abortions for being teens who made rash decisions, but " it 's not irresponsibility that makes women and girls seek abortion care. It’s their awareness of just how massive a commitment parenting is. "

Read More
1748 Words | 7 Pages

the president by majority vote for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.  After going from the house, two-thirds of the Senate must approve this request within the presence of the chief justice of the Supreme Court. o There have only been two successful impeachments in the history of the United States.  Andrew Johnson went against his own party in terms of policies regarding the Reconstruction era after the North won the Civil War.

Read More
68 Words | 1 Pages

Hi Courtney, It was tragic how the leaders of American Indian were treated. Sitting Bull an American Native try to comply with the government; however, even thought it was his land government official opposed his beliefs. Sitting Bull tradition was taken away from them. When Sitting Bull tried to regain his dignity by practicing a religious ritual called the Ghost Dance the government once again intervene. (Anderson,

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

In a representative democracy and in socialism there are checks and balances. In the US, the judicial branch can look at laws and rule them unconstitutional. For legislative, congress can overturn presidential vetoes and treaties with 2/3 vote from both houses, can reject nominations of judges, and can impeach the president. In a socialist government, prime ministers do not have many limitations, but countries like Canada do not have fixed term lengths so Prime Ministers can either stay for a long time

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, I would like to briefly touch upon the topic of impeachment. Impeachment is the removal or discrediting of a President before the end of term, this process is not easy for Congress and it is typically seen as the political equivalent of an indictment in Criminal Law. The House of Representatives may, by majority vote to impeach a president for “treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors” and if that is what is decided it moves to the Senate to be tried by the Chief Justice of the Supreme

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Before in an oligarchy or in a monarchy one person or group made the decisions about everything. This is a very basic similarity though, as the groups in each democracy do completely different things. The current American Democracy split up their responsibilities into three separate branches. These checks and balances are called; judiciary, legislative and executive. The leader of the country or president as we call him is contained in the executive branch.

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

The first three words of the Constitution already show that this country was created for the people’s voice to be heard. In a country forged by its citizens through hard work and bloodshed, where the very least that it can do to return the favor is by listening to their voice. Such a simple thing to do yet the government doesn’t seem to understand its importance. The time of electing a new leader is drawing near yet the people are still in the sidelines watching those in power decide what they think is best, and if lucky enough actually consider the people’s opinions. Why do the people of this country need to vote for someone to vote for a leader when they can just vote for themselves?

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

Rush Limbaugh once said, “The primary purpose of the Electoral College is to maintain the power of the states and to support the idea that the election is decided by the states. It’s not decided by the general population, and it never was.” Rush Limbaugh is describing exactly why the Electoral College was created- so that power could be divided amongst the states without one person holding more power than another. Although some people think that a national popular vote would be a better way to have elections, it is actually the exact opposite. Getting rid of the Electoral College would mean that not only would the bigger, more populated, cities hold all of the power, you are just one vote that is going up against thousands of others.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

To Dan Newhouse, Although some people say the electoral college is best for the public, it is actually putting chains on their opinions. Many people would say that the founding fathers made the electoral college because it was the best way to vote in their time. But what they don’t realise is that the electoral college is outdated, we have more people, and technology now, and that allows everyone to vote. That is why the electoral college should be stopped, so the chains that keep the citizens opinion’s down are broken.

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

In light of the recent United States 2016 presidential election, both politicians and other public figures have urgently pressed for electoral reform to address the system which allowed an unlikely candidate to become the forty-fifth President of the United States. The inauguration of Donald J. Trump into presidential office has revived the electoral reform campaigns that ensued after the presidential election of 2000, when Republican candidate George W. Bush prevailed over Democrat candidate Al Gore. The election itself holds controversy due to the Florida vote recount fiasco and the Supreme Court ruling that followed, titled Bush v. Gore (2000). However, the controversy now differs; instead of pointing fingers at court rulings and discussing

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

As a member of Generation Z, I have been alive to bear witness to five Presidential elections. My first recollection in regards to politics was a discussion between my family members on Thanksgiving about George W. Bush losing the popular vote to Al Gore in the election of 2000. Both of my parents were and still are staunch Republicans, while their parents were staunch Democrats. To my limited knowledge, I understood that Mr. Bush was not going to win the election because not enough people voted for him. Eventually in February, I found out that George W. would, indeed, become our next President.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Citizens of the United States are to hit the voting booths this coming November to decide between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as our new president. It all comes down to each and every one of those votes to determine the future of this country – or so you thought. The U.S doesn't use a one man one vote type of system to dictate the next president, but uses one called the Electoral College, in which the people are really voting for presidential electors. This method dates back to 1787 during the Constitutional Convention. The Committee of Eleven on Postponed Matters constructed the process considering all aspects of politics, in which the delegates obliged with only minor changes.

Read More
1592 Words | 7 Pages

The electoral college is a method by which the President of the United States is elected. The college consists of electors divided by state where each state has a number of electors equal to their number of Representatives and Senators. Every four years for the presidential election, in December, the members of the electoral college each cast a vote for two different candidates. These electors choose who they vote for based on the popular vote in their state. Essentially, they are supposed to represent the voters in their state by voting for whomever won that state's popular vote.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

The first attempt and success to climb Mt. Everest occured in 1953. Since then, almost 4,000 people have been able to scale the mountain, but over 230 people have not been able to climb it successfully. There is a chance of accident or death when climbing this mountain or any dangerous activity. All people should should have the right to rescue services even if they knowingly put themselves at risk because there is always a chance of an accident happening, rangers are there to save people in danger, and there are rescue vehicles being produced to be used in case of an emergency.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Impeachment

Related Topics

Open Document