International adoption—involving the transfer of children for parenting purposes from one nation to another—presents an extreme debate that rest on the legal idea and ethic debate form of do the risk of abuse in a minority of cases increase, in this form of adoption, than the larger good that most of these adoptions provide? First of all, international adoption has drop in the number of children being placed with new families in the past several years, and one of the main reasons for this to happen is the severe new restrictions that many countries have imposed. Some of the facts behind these restrictions, and that made the key forces to act is the child human rights, and argues that such adoptions deny heritage rights and sometimes involves abusive practices. Some nations support the idea of heritage rights, and hold on to the children born within their borders, and …show more content…
Lets beginnig with the idea that adoption is a long process in which many people is involved, and in this particular case of international adoption, even more people gets involved, so the reliability of each person involved gets reduced by a lot, because of the minimum knowledge that some of the adoptives use to have in this kind of process, it is for this reason that in some cases an abuse is presented. Some examples of abuse that might be comitted are stolen kids, fraud with money, inhumane conditions for the children, etc. Because of the fact that many of these international adoptions have presented an abuse of some kind, some experts and organizations, have speak out and presented the idea that the best thing to do for these orphans is that being adopted from other country should be the last option, and put all the efforts on helping keep the kids in their home country, by providing day care, better orphanages and encouraging more domestic