ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear War

879 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nuclear weapon pros and cons

A man once said,” In a world which is armed to its teeth with nuclear weapons, every quarrel or difference of opinion may lead to violence of a kind quite different from what is possible today.” This quote says that when any one has a falling out or is not in compliance with each other, they feel the need to bring or arm the nuclear weapons. A quite reasonable example is the north Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Atomic weapons have quite a bit of segments to it’s full effect on the world. Composing of expenses to create and to rebuild, deaths and undeniable world scarring war. In the capital of our own country nuclear warheads are being promised at an astronomical cost. The Trump administration is ramping up production of nuclear warheads even though the cost is way from affordable. In an article for the Washington Post Paul Sonne …show more content…

Nuclear weapons have been used not a frequently but they have been used effectively. One of the most destructive occurrences had to have been Hiroshima and Nagasaki. “Evidence from these events has opened our eyes to the truly destructive nature of Nuclear Weapons. This is a campaign for nuclear disbarment that has quite a few very persuading points and the statement above is so true down to a personal level. When a nuke hits radiation comes off it causing human destruction. “Nuclear Radiation can cause all cancers and Non Malignant Thyrodise.”(Us. Department of Veteran Affairs) Furthering the point of nuclear disbarment simply for the radiation reasons. Nuclear Weapons can destroy from up to thousands of miles away. “It has been shown that a nuclear attack can still destroy after 3,000 miles of travel. This shows that even from suppose a country a peace between or near two countries at war could be partially destroyed from pure force if atomic weapons are utilized. The destruction of life and of the not living by atomic attacks have taken its toll on the

Show More
Related
1094 Words | 5 Pages

This is a powerful argument, as it appeals to the emotions of the reader by suggesting a devastating and irreversible outcome if nuclear weapons are not abolished. They warn, “Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?” This statement is a stark reminder of the potential consequences of our actions and the need to work together to prevent such a catastrophic event. The authors argue that the use of nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of civilization as we know it. They claim that the only way to prevent a nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

This suggests that it was not only brinkmanship that prevented nuclear fallout, as a factor such as mass protests, had also prevented nuclear fallout as the overwhelming pressure of these actions caused the leaders involved to take non-violent

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

“A world without nuclear war would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us”. These words were spoken by Margaret Thatcher who supported the thought of using atomic warfare, and she wasn’t alone in this idea. President Harry S. Tuman also believed that during WWII, the use of the newly constructed atomic bombs were a crucial move that the U.S. military needed to make. The events that occured on April 6, 1945 changed the course of the war, and the invention of “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” made nuclear warfare possible for future conflicts. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military necessity during World War II.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More
1345 Words | 6 Pages

Wyatt Short Professor Justice English 0804-L03 27 March 2017 Nuclear warfare came about during World War II, after Leo Szilard Germen scientist who studied chemistry, found out that there is a way to spilt an atom or combine the atom that causes a violent physics, decided to write Roosevelt a letter explaining Hitler might be on the verge of creating his own bomb that would give him a far greater lead in the war. They found out that splitting the nuclei or combining them creates a violent reaction In 1941 Franklin started to discover his own nuclear warfare. Even though the Nazis were close to have the power in their control, people think this type of warfare is a cruel and unusual punishment and should not be used in war, but

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

After the American use of the atomic bomb on Japan in 1945, the tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union grew exponentially. A weapon with so much destructive power in the hands of the enemy was justifiability seen as a huge threat to the Soviets` safety and influence. The Soviets constructed their own nuclear bomb in response during August of 1948, and began a competition began between the two nations. Each country attempted to produce forces more impressive than the other`s, leading to the creation of increasingly ruinous weaponry. The constantly stressed situation proved sensitive to any movement by either country, altered domestically or otherwise.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More
2143 Words | 9 Pages

Nuclear weapons and nuclear war are words that are treated with respect and feared by everyone who speaks them and more importantly feared by those who have them and those who wish to have them. In society when people fear something they want to know more about the subject so they are able to form an educated opinion and understand what they are fearing and learn about the positives and negative consequences. At Trinity College students raised the question of nuclear war, the student body in the 1980’s were clear in their writings that they did not know what to expect with the rising nuclear arms races between the United States and then the then USSR; therefore students were fearful in these rising tensions and the language that was used by

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

The church believes that under no circumstances may nuclear weapons or other instruments of mass slaughter be used for the purpose of destroying population centers or other predominantly civilian targets. Non-nuclear attacks by another state must be resisted by other than nuclear means. One of the criteria of the just-war teaching is that there must be a reasonable hope of success in bringing about justice and peace. We must ask whether such a reasonable hope can exist once nuclear weapons have been exchanged. In the Bishop's view the first imperative is to prevent any use of nuclear weapons and hope that leaders will resist the notion that nuclear conflict can be limited, contained or won in any traditional sense.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

We, as the United States of America, need to prove to Japan and the rest of the world that our country is not one to trifled with. How many more have to die before we stand up for rights, our people, and our dignity? This is no longer a time to be generous or gentle, this is the time to end the war. That is why we need to send Japan our message and drop our atomic

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

When I think of medicine, two things come to mind. The first is, leave the world a better place than the way you found it. The second is, make the world a better place. Of course, a majority of people might claim that they want to make the world a better place, but are they really willing to put in the time and effort that is necessary in doing so? Like all things worth having, a medical career requires determination, motivation, and long hours spent becoming an expert in the field.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons. Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Nuclear War

Related Topics

Open Document