ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Texting And Driving

447 Words2 Pages

Some people believe that prohibiting the use of phones while driving also prohibits their freedom of speech and their right to privacy. They feel that they should be permitted to do what they want with their own belongings while in their own car without the government getting involved. This, however, is not allowing the government to do the very difficult job of protecting the good of the community. If a person feels that their privacy is what is most important, then they would definitely not want to be involved in a texting and driving accident. In many cases, when a person is texting and driving, and there is a crash, their phone will be confiscated by the court. The court will then release to the public exactly what the person was texting …show more content…

Her freedom to text her boyfriend from what she thought was the privacy of her own car, are both now worthless since she lost her life. To add on, updating your status on facebook is an also an example of exercising your freedom of speech. Those in favor of banning the use of phones while driving do not wish to take away this freedom of speech. In the words of the AT&T campaign, it is something that simply “can wait”. Tragically, not everyone hears this message loud and clear. Thirty two year old Courtney Sanford was excited when her favorite song “Happy” came on the radio (Withnall). She decided to voice her opinion about it on Facebook with a status update about how happy the song “Happy” made her (Withnall). That status update, that exercise of free speech, was her last time letting her voice be heard. If only Courtney had waited, she would be able to have new favorite songs and tell new people about it- from the safety of solid ground without a steering wheel in her hands. While this ban would infringe upon the privacy of a person’s choices within their car, that right to privacy and that right to speak are not nearly as important as the right to life; therefore, the person behind the wheel should be only that- a person behind a wheel and not a person on their

Show More
Related
2163 Words | 9 Pages

In the United States texting and driving laws are on state to states bases, which leaves questions from state to state and unawareness of laws like it did in the state of Utah. In A Deadly Wandering, by Matt Richtel, he examines the growing influence that technology has on the United States, and uses Reggie Shaw as an example. In 2006, Reggie Shaw was driving when he spun out of control and hit a car head on killing the two passengers. He did not remember the accident, but records showed that he had sent eleven text messages within minutes of the accident and denied it. When the trial rose, the state of Utah was uncertain of how to precede- their unawareness blindsided them.

Read More
1619 Words | 7 Pages

A persons’ privacy goes well beyond just what is commonly expected based on human nature. Privacy needs to be taken seriously due to the dangerous effects that can come about if there is an intrusion. So, for the courts to not address the blatantly obvious concerns of privacy due to cellular phones would be highly misjudged. Further, even though there is a better chance now with legislation to make strides in the realm of cellular data protection in relation to the Fourth Amendment, if it is not worked on and if we do not progress, generations to come will do nothing but further suffer (David Leon Riley, v. CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, v. BRIMA WURIE, 2014; Dee,

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

The talk delineates the life of Mary Mallon, widely held responsible for the transmission of typhoid. It was by unknowingly contracting typhoid that this flamboyant cook, who had migrated to the united states from Mexico in the 19th century, not only spread this deadly disease but also earned a nickname for herself: ‘Typhoid Mary’. Hence, the impact of her life in spreading typhoid in the USA was far-reaching indeed. 2. sound receptors The talk delineates the mechanism of sound receptors in human’s ear.

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

I can see the pros and cons of this device. It would be helpful in catching people that are texting and driving however, it is a violation of privacy. The fourth amendment sates that we are free from unreasonable search and seizure however, if you suspect someone is texting that is probable cause. If someone had probable cause that someone was texting then I do not think, it would be unreasonable to run a check. I think this tool could become a great way to prevent drivers from texting.

Read More
2054 Words | 9 Pages

In the last two years, both Kansas and Missouri have passed laws prohibiting some drivers from texting and driving at the same time, while some of the other laws prohibit every driver from texting while behind the wheel. These different laws (proposed and/or passed) have provided much debate. For instance, “Missouri's current law against texting while driving only applies to those drivers who are 21 or younger. The law was put in force in 2009 and was the result of a quickly composed legislative compromise” (“Texting While Driving Debate… “ 1).

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

An excuse that many people use is, "I am completely capable of texting on my phone without getting distracted. I have done it before and nothing has happened". Once someone has texted and drove without anything happening, they start to casually text more often, and eventually come to the conclusion that they are able to text while driving safely. Unbeknownst to most, texting while driving becomes a serious habit and they justify it completely inside.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

I think that people should stop texting and driving because there’s been so many injuries and deaths”(Apecsadmin). Many people text and drive if its illegal or legal they still do it thinking that they won’t get in trouble and they won’t die. That’s not the case anymore, many people think all those things and yet they still do it. More and more these days you see people walking and texting, everyone’s always on their phone.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

Cell phone can unveil information within our call history, text messages, pictures, and even internet searches. Access to our cell phones is like access to our lives. No matter how much time passes, the fourth amendment continues to

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

I like to have privacy of my own and I do not like what the government can just look through my text messages and know my location at every moment. I also believe that I are protected by the fourth amendment and the Supreme Court should involve technology in the fourth amendment. I don’t feel my information is save when it is in the hands of the police. Hackers have been more and more active over the years. A hacker will find a way to get in a police database and get the information of our cell phones.

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

She sent her last text but little did you know she was behind the wheel. Some people think it is completely fine to text and drive, but there are facts and very strong opinions that say otherwise. Can’t we all agree that texting and driving is an awful thing? Going on your technology when driving is a horrible thing to do, think about how many people get injured per day or year due to it, how it has an effect on other people, and how can we fix the problem. How many people get hurt and die from texting and driving?

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

People seem to not grasp the concept that texting while driving is dangerous, it does not matter the level of experience or the age. Per the National Highway Traffic Safeway Administration, talking on a cell phone causes nearly 25 percent of car crashes. That statistic directly points to the key fact that texting and driving is a key cause of most accidents on the road. Most people would be quick to the jump to the defense that these people aren’t them and they can do it better or be safer. But a study published by icebike.org refutes that as well.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

Texting and driving has been a major concern for drivers and pedestrians. Although there may be laws that illegalize driving while on the phone, people still give into their nasty habits intentionally, and without the idea of a casualty occurring. The National Safety Council has worked with people who have lost family members and friends due to crashes that involved in driver cell phone use. It has been scientifically, and due to the rate of casualty count, driving while texting is worse than driving while intoxicated or high on marijuana. Drivers in their 20s are 24 percent of drivers in all fatal crashes, but are 27 percent of the distracted drivers and 33 percent of the distracted drivers that were using cell phones in fatal crashes.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

This means that it is legal to text as long as the car is stationary. Perhaps this is why many DJs on the radio say to pull over before texting their

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

These days almost everyone owns a cell phone. Texting has become a worldwide phenomenon and people can’t seem to put their phone down, even when they’re driving. Texting and driving injures about 330,000 people per year. Most states in the US have illegalized texting and driving, but four states are still allowing this to happen. Texas, Montana, Missouri, and Arizona have yet to make this dangerous combination illegal.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

It captures the info instantly and lets you see everything you want to know when you log into your account. Accidents from texting and driving are higher than ever and many states are banning texting and driving and also working on banning using a handheld phone while driving. What does this mean, if you don't have a hands free device you can get pulled over and get a fine. The state of Maryland has banned cell phone use while driving unless you have a hands free device, if you are seen on the phone, you will get pulled over and get a

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Texting And Driving

Related Topics

Open Document