Persuasive Essay On The Electoral College

821 Words4 Pages

“Political reform means improving the laws and constitutions in accordance with expectations of the public” (Campaign for Political Reforms). The political system has lost its grasp on true democracy. Nearly half of American citizens do not participate in voting, corporations are drowning out the American voices, and the Electoral College causes unfair presidential races. More citizens need to be voting, corporations should no longer have such an overbearing influence on politics, and the Electoral College should be improved. American citizens aren’t voting, and this is a problem. In the 2012 election, 62.3 percent of legal citizens voted. In 2008, only 57.5 percent voted, in 2004, 60.4 percent, and in 2000 only 54.2 percent of the American …show more content…

They have also been given the Help America Vote Act which is a federal law with goals that all states and localities upgrade election procedures, registration processes, and poll worker training (Wikipedia). So even though Americans have both of these laws to aid them in exercising their right to vote, they still choose not to vote. Another issue occurs within the circle of politicians and industry owners. Lobbying is an active practice between politicians and industry owners today and has been for many years. The insurance industry has spent $2,348,468,087 in lobbying to 160 clients using 811 lobbyists. The oil and gas industry has spent $1,847,575,425 in lobbying to 162 clients using 663 lobbyists (Open Secrets.org). The court case Citizen’s United v. FEC “opened the door” for unlimited election spending by corporations, and created “super PAC’s,” political action committees which make no financial contributions to candidates or parties and can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and unions (Wikipedia). Another court case Buckley v. Valeo struck down provisions of 1671 Federal Election Campaign Act that had imposed limits on various types of expenditures by or on behalf of candidates for federal office, but still upheld FECA’s limits on contributions to individual candidates and to multiple candidates’ interest groups, and PAC’s. It introduced that