In America, universal healthcare would undermine principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would undermine individual liberty, free enterprise and free
However, some might say that the benefits outweigh the odds as more people will be able to have better health care so it is benefiting humanity. But, Universal Healthcare should not happen. If Universal Healthcare happens, how would the government pay for it?
The current debate concerning the implementation of universal healthcare in America is hard to understand because it is comprised most of practical arguments of concern for the motives behind the project. Before one asks how much it will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, they should ask whether implementing universal healthcare is best for keeping with the values and principles of the American way. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
The health care system in the United States is in need of help. The current system in the United States is no longer working and the Obamacare plan is not working. Obamacare is not working for the best interest of Americans. While Obamacare took a step in the right direction, it is not a big enough step. The United States needs a form of universal health care that will benefit everyone and not have people in debt from health care bills.
Universal healthcare has some good ideas behind it, because it promotes equality among all people, and has many benefits. In the United States, we have the PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) to help implement those things. The PPACA has many flaws that need to be addressed and changed so that healthcare in America can be beneficial and fair to all
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
If the United States ever implies for us to have a universal health care system, some would agree and be happy forever, but others as well will be mad and imply that it is bad for the economy. In the next few paragraphs I will be telling you the differences in the way people think about the universal health care plan. It may seem that some people presume that universal health care will bring costs down and increase the access to health care for everyone. In my opinion I don 't really see how they would bring the costs down. Maybe since they decided to have universal health care, they must have also decided to bring the costs down so more people can afford it.
Free healthcare for everyone I believe everyone deserves to be given free healthcare if they can not afford it. Plenty of people are dying because we don’t have coverage for everyone. More people are needing universal healthcare and we should be able to give it to those in need. This is making us look so bad to other countries.
Health care is the maintenance and improvement of physical and mental health, especially through the provision of medical services. Don 't you believe that this is a right and dignity of all people should be able to have. Your body should be taken care of no matter the gender,race,health,or social economic back ground it is a right. Health care deserves to be able to be taken care of. I believe that universal health care for everyone is very important it will benefit people from the richest to the poorest.
(Finish and Refine)The U.S. is dubbed the “land of the free” for many aspects; the free market economy, rights, etc. But the one thing that is not free about our country is our healthcare system. How is it that a country that prides itself for its progressive advancements still cannot crack the code for affordable healthcare? I want to answer the question on why the U.S. doesn’t adopt a universal system of healthcare despite its success in other countries, as well as what would happen economically in the short/long run economically? Ultimately, do the costs outweigh the benefits when establishing free healthcare for all?
the emergency room, prove their economic status, and hope that the right tests will be ordered to catch a health problem. Though these supposed positives are all untrue. One of the first affects you would notice within the U.S. had we gone from an insurance mandate to a two-tier socialized health care system, as mentioned with Canada, It would create a massive doctor shortage. The United States is already tens of thousands of doctors short of meeting the basic minimums that are required for proper care.
In the end of the day we still don’t have a health care industry that fully benefits many individual’s needs and that provides a free market that encompasses all. It’s amazing how the United States spends more money on health care than any other nation and we are talking in the trillions of dollars and still, we have millions of people left without health coverage. To top this off, we also have one of the lowest life expectancies as well as a high infant mortality rate compared to other wealthy nations. So we ask our self why just about every developed country in the world has a universal health care system that
Healthcare is something everyone needs and should be able to get, but right now that is not happening. In America there are millions of people who don’t have healthcare insurance. This is because some can’t afford the insurance plan. There are also millions more who have health insurance, but can’t afford using it. This means that they are paying for an insurance plan, but the deductibles are so high they can’t afford to go to the doctor.
