ipl-logo

Should Animals Be Killed By Harsh Chemicals?

807 Words4 Pages

For how long will we let innocent animals be tortured by harsh chemicals? Right now there are about 100 million animals around the world that are being tested on in a laboratory. Animal testing is a serious issue that needs to be stopped. Animals are having harsh chemicals from household products being tested on them, and it causes an enormous amount of pain and suffering to these poor animals. This pain needs to end, and only we can end it.
Most of the tests performed on animals are not even effective on humans because of our different anatomies. There may be animals, such as monkeys, that are similar to the human anatomy. But having a similar anatomy does not mean that the reactions to these chemicals will be the same. Pain is expressed in different ways, an animal might be able to handle the pain being caused to them but a human may not, our bodies will react …show more content…

They can feel all of the pain being caused to them, and humans don’t know that pain because we don’t have to go through it, we don’t have to feel it. Or see it. If the consumers saw what was happening to these poor animals, they would think twice about buying the products that test on animals. There are many people standing up and fighting against animal testing, people whom all of us look up to. Paul McCartney is one of those people, and he stands up and fights for these poor animals being used to test chemicals. He agrees that the consumers of these products would not buy them if they saw what was happening to animals for that product to be on the shelves. Paul McCartney(2017) once said that “If every cosmetic tested on rabbits or mice had a photo on the packaging showing these animals with weeping swollen eyes and inflamed skin, I believe everyone would leave cruelty on the shelf.”(para.2). These animals do not deserve to live a life full of pain and die in pain from these tests. It is immoral, and

Show More
Related
282 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that millions of animals suffer in the U. S. just because of animal testing? When these animals are getting tested, they feel pain, but cannot react to it because they cannot speak up. To begin with, animal testing is not effective. Many animals do not get all of the same diseases that humans get.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, some major ethical issues with animal testing is that animals are often forced to suffer diseases, injuries, and live in isolated cages awaiting death by the end of the study; but, even though researchers try to reduce the pain, “they aren’t able to completely prevent any pain from occurring” since animals are living beings. Animals experience a considerable amount of pain and are subjected to all kinds of suffering including testing as awful as forced diseases, injuries, and enduring a life of isolated captivity. However, when the scientist no longer needs the animal, the animal is put to sleep without any thought about the animal’s life or purpose; so, this poor treatment of animals is morally wrong because animals live and breathe just as humans do and should be treated with more respect. Because much of medical research has nothing to do with animal testing, there seems no reason to continue this kind of animal abuse for animal testing is obviously not the core of medical progressions. Also, alternatives in the medical field are being made to replace animal testing, so animals no longer have to deal with the torture they have been subjected to, and these alternatives will most likely advance the medical field more than animal testing has advanced the medical field.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

It is still not right with many advanced technologies today, there should be an alternative route instead of testing on animals, human could be the one to volunteer for simple experiments. In glass testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. ("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report.") There are micro-dosing, giving small doses to test for any reactions, and human could be volunteered for the experiment, and then the blood are analyzed after the small doses onto the skin.("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report,") There are artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert, is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

The future of animal Testing has became an ongoing problem for years, and now the animals might have a voice. Animal Rights activists have had enough with use of small animals such as mice, rabbits, and even chimpanzees. Scientist are trying to figure out different ways that products may be used to help save the lives of many animals. Some might think its impossible while others believe they can eliminate using animals all together in ways like skin graphs, and by even creating human body cells to see how the chemicals and other products effect the human. Many are concerned that money wise the testing on animals are cheaper than having to genetically create human skins in labs and test the products on them.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are obviously different than humans, and many drugs/cosmetics react to animals and humans react differently. Because animals and humans are so different tests are not accurate and then humans are affected in turn. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

“Animal cruelty should not take place if men truly understand the command to be “caretakers” of the earth” (What Does the Bible Say). This quote reflects on the way animals are to be treated by man, and how as people should protect these innocent animals from over killing and abuse. In addition, the video ANIMAL TESTING: some facts state that Labs or other facilities that condone animal testing have emphasize that there is evidence supporting that animal research benefits human, but there is no such evidence (ANIMAL TESTING). Moreover, new alternatives are being cultivated in many different labs that could make animal testing vanish. Even though animal testing can help find new cures, the use of animals for testing is cruel and inhumane because animals can feel just like a human being or living thing.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong.

Read More
2018 Words | 9 Pages

More than 100 million animals die each year in the US, due to drug testing, biology lessons and medical training (PETA, Experiments on Animals: Overview, 2014) A scientist explained how an experiment worked out and the results are horrifying: “Drug A killed all the rats, mice and dogs. Drug B killed all the dogs and rats. Drug C killed all the mice and rats. Drug D was taken by all the animals up to huge doses with no ill effect” (Carey, 2002).Animal testing is painful and animals have their own rights to freedom and their own rights to live (Regan, 2004, p. 10)They are used for a wide range of tests that can include: testing new substances, causing mental deficiency, inserting electrodes into the brain, burning skin and blinding, together with other painful and obtrusive processes.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

I’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Poisoning, shocking, burning, and killing animals is what happens in labs all around the world and most people support it because they think it can benefit us or think there just some dumb animals. But that’s not true these dumb animals that people are testing on are living breathing creatures that have emotions and can feel pain. Animals should not go through such suffering and to back up what I am trying to prove here are three reasons why animals should not be tested on. Wait! Hold up just one minute, before you put on your make up and perfume did you ever stop to think where all of your make up, soap, perfume, and cleaning products even come from?

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Since animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and alternative testing methods now exist, we should discontinue animal testing once and for all. For these reasons, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of human products. To begin with, animal testing is cruel, inhumane and it violates animals’ rights. The USDA reported that in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia at all for relief.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More

More about Should Animals Be Killed By Harsh Chemicals?

Related Topics

Open Document