Photography As Reconstruction: Professional Practice

1596 Words7 Pages

Photography as reconstruction
Professional Practice
Modern methods of collecting evidence have more objective character, such as DNA, fingerprints, blood types, autopsy and much more. No matter the fact that objective has its quality and reliability, some of them still in need of visual representation.
Photography and visual representation have made a massive impact on modern investigations. Professionals use certain cameras to collect the visual appearance of the object found at the crime scene. As was previously mentioned, collecting the evidence correctly is extremely important for the future court case.
Documenting the original position of the object, body, record the original condition of the location of the scene. The main control …show more content…

Traditionally, Pathologist creates a folder and writes off all the injuries and death cause, as well as all the details about the body, when it was found, how decayed it is, and includes a photograph of the body as well, as the text itself is not enough for the court. That supports the autopsy results and evidence. Visual reconstruction is used to preserve the body virtually so that it can be given to the family as soon as possible. It is working the same way as X-RAY and MRI, but it has a different level of frequency.
The reconstruction can not only amplify the injuries, it can go as deep as inner part of the bones, capturing every single layer of the body. That opens much more detail of the body to the professionals, that autopsy itself cannot provide. (Pbs.org. …show more content…

It has a combination of other types of science, neglect that, Photography has its own impact, but it still leads us to interpretation, like any other visual context. It has a lot of problematic aspects, as it is all due to human is interpretation and collection, otherwise said- Human factor. Science is developing and moving forward rapidly, from rudimental to high tech. Many sacrifices were made, by wrongful convictions, as well as many deaths were led away without any reason. Unfortunately, Crimes will continue to dive, and that is the only motive for forensics to go forward and evolve. The high technology already made a massive jump in the jurisdiction, as well as criminals, so it seems like a never-ending story. Visual evidence was and still most important support for society, apart from objective evidence, as experience shows, there is never too much evidence, but there is always a minimum to the evidence folder. It is always worth looking into many factors of evidence, and what is most difficult- is being neutral, as human sympathy or apathy is common within the jury’s room. There are many ways of finding the responsible. However, the human rights are the part of the law. Personally, I believe that some ethics should be carried away from the perspective of human emotion. Instead, widely used for purpose of finding the truth. Hopefully, there will be a stage in society, that will be neutral and underlying, that