ipl-logo

Pivotal Pros Of Media Censorship

1226 Words5 Pages

All around the world, countires silence their media to prevent their citizens from knowing about certain topics. The government shouldn’t be able to silence very outspoken or unreliable media outlets. Ignorant people would stay ignorant if the government could silence the media. Keeping the media open and exposed the public to important issues. Silencing the media will keep important secrets from us. Silencing the media would prevent certain truths from coming out. Silencing the media would target special groups more in terms of hate. The government would be controlling the media if the government could silence them. Ignorant people would remain if the government silenced our media. If the government controlled what we say, it would keep people unaware of what is happening outside of their lives (Pivotal Pros and Cons of Media Censorship 10), consequently people who don’t pay attention to important issues, would stay that way and our country would be full of ignorant people. Politicians may be to pay for and …show more content…

The truth of some topic would be prevented by the government (Media Censorship: Good or Bad? 9), the government would change facts of a story to bring it in their favor.The article told partial truths in Philip’s suspension (Nothing But the Truth), the article did tell the partial truth in Philip’s suspension, but it’s just that people misinterpreted the story. The public wouldn’t know about Philip’s suspension in the first place if it was censored (Nothing But the Truth), if the story was censored in the first place, the public would no idea about the issue. If issues were silenced it would keep the media more factual (Nothing But the Truth), But the media also needs opinions as well. The media presented that a high school expelled a student, but for the wrong reason (Nothing But the Truth), the media, however, did present some correct facts about the story, but people misinterpreted

Show More
Related
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Censorship in America can vary between the silencing of young voices and the prevention of exposing others of inappropriate material. Many people are afraid of losing their freedom of speech, as first amendment rights should be mandatory for American citizens. Polar to this argument insists the importance of censorship, as it can shield the public from information that can lead to fear or chaos. Leaving students ignorant to world problems, however, is argued by Sonja West that it removes their first amendment rights and creates a future working-class of Americans who are clouded from the truth. West is a law professor at the University of Georgia who is distinguished for her expertise in the first amendment law and minor in journalism.

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

”(cia.gov) Also, censorship helps protect people. During WWII, the government censored many different newspapers and news bulletins because they had appeals to the American people from Nazi leaders and Japanese leaders trying to manipulate the American people. The Government would restrict these news sources because they would decrease the American morale and make them want to end the war effort (Blankley). Censorship, in limited forms, is right and necessary

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

Censorship has existed in society for centuries. Some oppose censorship, and some believe that limiting access to information and ideas is better for a society. Charles Bukowski once said, “Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others. Their fear is only their inability to face what is real, and I can't vent any anger against them; I only feel this appalling sadness. Somewhere in their upbringing, they were shielded against the total facts of our existence.”

Read More
1660 Words | 7 Pages

Making sure they see what they want them to see. The 1% has made bids to buy air time and it's being glady accepted by television executives. This leads to censorships. Tom Brokaw said“all wars are based on propaganda” (2009) Media won't cover the real stories or question the government or policies in any way that the American government and mainstream media been blended together as one. Taking a job in the media to become a real reporter isn't a real

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

In the United States, we have a constitutional right to having mass media. If someone chooses to be well informed they have multiple choices to get their facts from, they even have options to check what they’ve been told. For us this is normal stuff, so much that some people don’t even pay attention to what’s happening around the country, we take it for granted. In the Soviet Union, they didn’t have mass media, mostly because the primary means of news was the radio as most people in the country didn’t have a television. The news that they did receive through the radio or the newspaper was controlled by their government.

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

Refugee History: Creating Understanding. Historically, one hallmark of human culture is the unfortunate distinction of how we treat the most vulnerable in our society. Furthermore, in western culture, the stories of those abused (including harmed children) are overlooked in exchange for ignorance surrounded by a privileged life. To learn more about overlooked historical events, an excellent read is the fictional novel, Refugee.

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

By censoring critical literature via the very governmental organizations created to do such things, the government deprives its citizens of intellectual freedom, development, and speech leading to a dysfunctional educational system that fosters a biased and discriminatory society. The concept of censorship has a long history which commenced in Rome, Greece, and China during pre-modern times before its inheritance by the United States during the 19th

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

By exercising this freedom, we have the right to gather and report news and information. Considering that the United States is a democracy-oriented country, freedom of the press is very important to its citizens. Media allows citizens to follow the government's actions and call them out on their errors. Additionally, it allows one to express themselves by exposing them to a wide range of information and opinions. America would not be a democracy if freedom of the press were not available.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

is because it violates our 1st Amendment rights. One of the most basic first amendment rights are freedom of speech and press. As U.S. citizens, we have a right to read what we want, and this includes information the government holds captive. We also have a right to press and exposing that information. However, the media has that right to withdraw that information from the public, but in censoring that information, the media is prohibiting our 1st Amendment right of freedom of speech.

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

The media has become notorious for spreading rumors and butting into people’s lives. Your favorite magazines, your favorite news shows, the songs on the radio, they can say horrible things. This is because us, Americans. are promised rights in the Constitution. The Constitution is a document that acts as a base for our government.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

By true definition, censorship is the suppression and illegalization of speech, public communication, and other information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, or politically incorrect as determined by the government in authority. The purpose of censorship is perhaps to protect the people, however, negative outcomes typically follow when this route is taken to control a governed people. Censorship directly attack the main characters of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and George Orwell’s 1984. Although government censorship was perpetuated to create a whole and perfect society, Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 both demonstrate that censorship brought on by the government negatively controls a community’s thoughts, actions, and their people as a whole.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, media censorship is also used for wrong motives, mostly by the government who is trying to protect themselves from anti-politics ideas or any other movement against them. Censorship became at some point a weapon apply to keep citizens ignorant, by denying the entry or spread of sensitive information inside the country, authorities assure the status quo remaining, prohibiting to their nation the opportunity to learn more and to think differently, all because this could cause the loss of their power. Media censorship is a delicate matter where there is not a perfect position about it. As is known, media is one of the most important instruments use to communicate opinions in a short period of time to a big part of the world, this makes it a very power device with the capacity to change everything just with one word and give to the society great benefits, but it can also be used in negative ways, affecting directly the good relationship between communities, all critical aspects that make you think it is imperative to establish rational basic rules and boundaries to avoid the media become a dangerous threat to

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

My opinion on this situation is that media is overpowered and if it was an official branch congress would have to even out the powers in order for it to work in a reasonable and controlled way. However it becoming an official branch is highly unlikely and will most likely never occur. I do feel that propaganda is taking over the aspect of being free and interrupting your political mindset on issues. Overall I think the media’s powers should be evened out and intertwine other positive aspects into their work rather than

Read More
2798 Words | 12 Pages

A media source which ignores or censors important issues and events severely damages freedom of information. Many modern tabloids, twenty four hour news channels and other mainstream media sources have increasingly been criticized for not conforming to general standards of journalistic integrity. In nations described as authoritarian by most international think-tanks and NGOs media ownership is generally something very close to the complete state control over information in direct or indirect ways. Undesirable consequences which occur due to media imperialism are: • Commercially driven ultra-powerful mass market media is primarily loyal to sponsors i.e. advertisers and government rather than to the public interest.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

An Argumentative Essay on Media Censorship Censorship is a control over unacceptable sources found in all forms of media: such as, newspapers, television, and the Internet. Censorship in the media is to examine all the information found in the media, and deleting or censoring anything that is considered objectionable to the state. Each country controls their own media depending on their religious beliefs, culture and moral ideas. There are many reasons to why censorship of the media is a disadvantage. Governments love to control their nations, and a way of controlling their ideas is by censoring information, which citizens have every human right to access.

Read More

More about Pivotal Pros Of Media Censorship

Related Topics

Open Document