Plot Summary Of The Hinderson By Thomas Henderson

432 Words2 Pages

The exposition of the story is the people of earth celebrating that they won the war. The silence was nice. Technicians were not running around and such. Yet this time would not last forever. The rising action in the story is when Henderson said, "If I told you the data was unreliable, what could you have done but replace me and refuse to believe me? I couldn't allow that." Then Jablonsky asked Henderson what he did. This made my heart speed up because I was now curious as to what he did. The climax of this selection is when Henderson explains that he corrected the data. He used his intuition and juggled them till they looked correct. First he only did a little but here and there. When the sky did not collapse he wrote out the data that was …show more content…

If it had been important he would have followed it up on it and found out it was Henderson. So Henderson got away with it. Henderson asked him what he meant by “nothing mattered.” Jablonsky then said, “What made you think Multivac was in working order, whatever the data you supplied it?" He said that they were not working reliably. Jablonsky didn’t have technicians, he made do with kids and retired veterans who barely knew what they were doing. Jablonsky said, “it didn't matter whether the data being supplied Multivac were reliable or not. The results weren't reliable.” Henderson then asked him what he did. Jablonsky then said he introduced the bugger factor. Then, adjusted matters in accordance with intuition. That's how the machine won the war. This is the climax because between the men you find out what really happened. The falling action in this story is when Swift said that he was correct for not placing too much reliance upon it. Swift explained that he never knew that what Multivac ever said is what it meant. He said that “Multivac was not the first computer, friends, nor the best-known, nor the one that can most efficiently lift the load of decision from the shoulders of the executive.” He said that a very simple computing device that he used to make decisions on had won the