Title:
A comparison of the effects of cannabis in countries with liberal and repressive policy approaches.
Analysis of the title:
This essay will compare the liberal policy effects Netherlands and Uruguay with the repressive policy effects Philippines and India. Also, it will evaluate the benefits and the drawbacks of the liberal policy approach as opposed to repressive approach.
Introduction: Cannabis is a type of drugs implanted and used in some countries. The percentage of cannabis users in recent years around the world is about 17% or 1 in 6 daily. Cannabis was used in medical issues but some people started to smoke cannabis and it became a common type of drugs. There are liberal and repressive policy law in the world. This essay will examine Netherlands and Uruguay as liberal countries, Philippine and India as restrictive countries. (Abuse, 2015). This essay will argue the policy effects of cannabis in countries having liberal law and countries having restrictive law.
Body paragraphs:
Para1:
The liberal policy approach in Netherlands and Uruguay does not criminalize self-use of cannabis, but they currently prohibit the possession, import and export of cannabis in large quantities. An example of social effects of these laws in both countries is using cannabis can increase crimes and violent in society.
Para 2:
The repressive
…show more content…
While, in restrictive countries they struggle to save life of children and adults. In another hand, there are drawbacks of liberal policy law in Uruguay and Netherlands such as it increases the number of crimes and it leads many persons to prison. While, the repressive policy approach in Philippines and India raises the number of illegal smugglers in