ipl-logo

Positive Attributes Of Anti-Federalism In The United States

1170 Words5 Pages

Federalism is the US government separating power between a large main government and the individual states. In a federal system, the national government takes care of some things like delivering mail or making treaties with other countries. The state government takes care of other things like driver’s licenses and other business license. They also share control of things such as taxation on both a federal and state level. Anti-Federalism is apposed to giving power to the federal government. They fear the government has too much athority under the constitution. They want states to have the most power not a national government because they believed they were only protecting the wealthy aristocrats.

Federalism has many positive attributes …show more content…

It would also restrict the power of the people and not allow their voices to be heard. Anti-Federalists feared that the rich white landowners wouldn’t care about the people that lived in rural areas. They specifically noted the lack of term limits and rotation of office. If a president could stay in office for a long period of time it could become a dictatorship. They didn’t want people to stay in office long enough to feel …show more content…

I think we do need a strong central government made up of small states, but the government should not infringe on my rights. I think todays federalism works well for us but we could have some clarification in the separation of powers between federal and state. This would cause less conflict and confusion amongst people, local govt, state govt, and federal govt. I think we do a great job with our separation of powers in the federal system. We have many checks and balances that keep a dictatorship from arising, but they are also strong enough to protect the country. I like that we have both a state and federal system because it allows both small and large issues to be addresses. It’s a perfect balance of power because if the government was weaker we could be taken over by a third party or we would break apart from disagreements. If they were any stronger then we would have an issue where the president’s political party could take over. I think that both parties have valid points and when one overshadows the other they don’t care about the good points the other side

Show More
Related
931 Words | 4 Pages

Edwards and Wattenberg define Federalism as, “a way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government share formal authority over the same area and people. (Edwards and Wattenburg,70)” When the United States first started to form a central government their objective was to never allow for a dominating power to take over the country again. To do so they created a division of power and made it possible for states and more so the “people” the right to have more of an impact on government. Or so were their intended thoughts when creating the constitution and the branches. In doing so their focus constrained national government but left a loose string as to what the states and their constitutions could do.

Read More
235 Words | 1 Pages

They believed that the power should be with the people and a strong national government would take away the rights on individuals. This idea

Read More
254 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism is a system of government where national government and local/state were together/ share powers. Checks and balances prevent any one branch of government from being too powerful because branches must share power. Federalism divides the powers to both national and state government and that's how federalist limit the powers of the national government. Checks and balances can limit national government power through the three branches of government because of each branches designated responsibilities.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

Federalism a system of government in which power is divided, by a constitution, between a central government and regional governments. The Constitution restricts the power of the states in favor of ensuring enough power to the national government to give the country s free-flowing national economy. The framers’ concern with the national concern with national supremacy was also expressed

Read More
1193 Words | 5 Pages

This ideology scared the Anti-Federalists who feared the elites would control through the people. People wouldn’t be able to express their own opinions on the public good because it could conflict with more powerful people who could wield influence on an individual’s

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism is an important part of the way our government runs. Federalism is the system in which power is divided between two levels of government, national and state. This dual system was created for one important reason; so no one government holds more power in hopes to preserve liberty. Each level has its own role, the national level authorizes certain areas of governance while the state level has power with prospective jurisdiction. “The united states established the first federal system, and about two dozen countries today have one.

Read More
327 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government that creates one central government, like the US government and there are regional governments, like the 50 smaller state governments. The history for federalism can be hard to explain. In the history of the United States, the people who supported to sign the Constitution are called federalists. “Federalism dates back to approximately 1200-1400 A.D.,” when Native American nations created the Iroquois confederacy. (Miskelly and Noce., p112).

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that there should be a strong federal government and a weak state government. This type of government system should help regulate the economy. The federal government should consist of different branches and the power between the federal government and the state should be divided. The federal government should establish justice, promote the general welfare, secure blessings of liberty, insure domestic tranquility and provide for the common defense. A state government should have different groups of people to help govern.

Read More
256 Words | 2 Pages

They believed that the U.S. Government should not be separated between each individual states themselves and they also believed they should have the majority of the power over the whole country. Due to the

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

Since the beginning of its creation America has been known as being the land of the free. The Anti-Federalist movement was the only way America would have kept its founding principles, and prevent the monarchy like Federalist movement from occurring, thus saving Americans freedom. Those that would be representatives in government of the United States would be composed of the rich. The rich only have their own best interests in mind and thus, silence those they are meant to be representing.

Read More
275 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism in the United States is a system of checks and balances between the state government and the national government rights. The U.S Constitution authorizes certain powers to the state government, also reserves certain powers to the national government, and other powers that are shared among both governments. Dual Federalism is authorities that are distinctly separated among national and state governments. While governing peacefully and equally, they both do not interfere each other's territory of responsibilities. Which means both governments remain supreme within their own sovereignty, governing specific responsibilities for certain policies.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Government system is a fundamental need for each country to have. It is a series of political institutions used to organize a state to enforce power over a political community. There are lots of type of government system, one of them is federalism. There are three distinct periods in the evolution of federalism which are dual federalism (1789 – 1945), cooperative federalism (1945-1969) and the new federalism (1969 – Present). Basically, federalism is a system of government in which power is divided, by a constitution, between a central government and regional governments.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Positive Attributes Of Anti-Federalism In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document