Priscilla Drumpf Case Summary

In this case we have an chief management account and controller Priscilla Drumpf who is having a romantic relationship with the manager of the company`s power department Richard Clinton. In this case the topic was involving the company`s power department was about to make. Richard who was informed by Priscilla that the local company offered to supply power and quoted the price per kilowatt-hour that they said will hold for the next three years. If this decision making goes through than Richard department will be gone and Richard has convince Pricilla to give false information about the analysis to the director of the company. In this essay I will be analysing problems/opportunities which could challenge/assist the welfare of the various stakeholders

Under integrity it states that members must be straightforward and honest in professional and business and also fair dealing and truthfulness (Langfield Smith, 2015). If Priscilla choose to support Richard and provide false information to the director than Priscilla is failing to comply with integrity with the company and herself. She is failing to be honest with the company and failing to have strong moral principles, which can lead to a negative consequences in the future that can cause her job to be lost and her accountant title to be taken away from her. I strongly suggest that Priscilla provides the company`s director John Lawrence the report analysis Jackie Chen has prepared, the analysis that is prepared will show an clear and accurate result for the company so that the company can make the most accurate decision which will benefit the company. I understand that Priscilla is under pressure to make decision which will benefit her partner and his department but as an accountant she owns to the company to act in the best interest with honesty therefore she should strongly follow the right pathway and provide the company with the accurate report of analysis while complying with the code of

Objectivity states that members must not compromise their professional or business judgement because of bias, conflict of interest or the undue influence of others. Providing misleading information (Langfield Smith, 2015). Providing misleading information and supporting Richard department will be considered to be unfair and bias. Priscilla should make decision that is in the best interest of the company and avoid any bias judgement due to her personal relationship with