Pro Death Penalty Essay

Desmond Tutu, a South African social rights activist and retired Anglican bishop, once said, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." The death penalty is the worst punishment used for serial killers in the United States and throughout other nations in the world. It is the punishment execution legally implied to someone that committed a capital crime. This punishment is for people who intentionally killed an individual, and convicted a capital offense. There are 31 states with the death penalty throughout the United States, including the U.S. Government and the U.S. Military (ProCon.org 1). The punishment consists of legally and intentionally put to death the criminal with methods as lethal injection and electrocution.

Constitution, in an inhumane way. But actually, the death penalty is not the only method to punish capital criminals in a just and deserved way, life imprisonment is an easier and less complicated way to punish criminals. Since it involves the life of individuals, the death penalty has become a national issue among society, and it is an issue that has various possible solutions for it to be abolished as establishing alternative punishments that do not imply killing an individual, and also reinforcing the already formed methods of punishments as the life imprisonment system. It is also a controversial issue, since there are people who believe that it should be abolished, and other people in favor of its use. Part of the victims’ families and the government of the states that still use the death penalty are some of the people that opt against the abolishment of the death penalty. But the death penalty should be abolished, since it affects innocent people that are in death row, other part of the victims’ families, it is a cruel method of punishment, it violates human rights, and is more expensive and less effective than life

“That is a demonstrated error rate of 1 innocent person for every 7 person executed” (ProCon.org 2). It is inhumane to put human beings as objects ready to be eliminated. Although most of the death penalty cases have involved guilty people, the possibility of convicting an innocent person to execution exists. The risk of unjustly damaging someone’s dignity and integrity by taking his or her life should be a reason enough to abolish this punishment. The death penalty causes irrevocable mistakes, and we need to ensure that we are not killing any innocent people and either any people. Police officers and prosecutors can make quick arrestments and ignore evidence that can prove that the individual arrested is innocent, when managing the fate of a life, only accuracy and exact evidence need to be involved. Regret is not an option for the irrevocable mistakes that the death penalty have caused and can still be causing. In January 2003, Illinois Governor George Ryan communicated that the sentences of all state’s death row could not ensure that prisoners were guilty because the system was so inaccurate (Tillis 2). This exposes that we cannot be one hundred percent sure, when authority who implies these punishments should found that certainty as the priority. It brings consequences that can’t be