According to any article from the Tribune Business News, “non-death-penalty states have lower crime rates” Execution is murder. Even if earned it is still a heinous act, an act that has no positive effect on the crime rate. First and foremost there has been an increasing amount of evidence that proves the innocence of many individuals. In addition to that it is a conviction that is unfairly applied to black citizens. Finally, it’s a waste of money that could be used in ways that are beneficial to those who suffer.
Over the years, new equipment and methods had been created to help determine whether those charged with heinous crimes are innocent or guilty but before that and even now innocent people are being sentenced to death for crimes they
…show more content…
As an article posted in 2012 states “Decades of research shows the racial bias pervades death penalty cases” even if the person charged with the crime was innocent and there was evidence of information to prove that the jury would still neglect to acknowledge that and base their judgment on the color of the defendant’s skin. Another article says that “Blacks in California are sentenced to death at a rate five times higher than their proportion of the population” when it’s a black person being prosecuted they throw the death penalty around like it’s some joke like the person standing in front of them isn’t a person at all. The statistics show that “minority defendants with white victims are much more likely to be sentenced to death than others” if this is the case why aren’t whites more likely to be sentenced to death if the victims are black? That’s because whites believe they are superior to black like they have more meaning to the world than people of color but we are all human so why do whites get special privileges it’s not impartial. There are many articles, videos, statistical charts that show racism is a major issue and plays a big role in the