The Articles of Confederation, the first governing document in American history, only allowed for one branch of government, Congress, which could lead to one group of people having all of the power, possibly not allowing for representation of all of the social classes. This upper class tyranny was exactly the problem that the colonists had fled from in England, and they were afraid that these issues would continue to plague them in America. This fear led to a very weak central government, whose extremely limited power stunted the development of our young nation. Later, when writing the Northwest Ordinances, Jefferson proposed the idea of having three branches of government, and a system of checks and balances between the three to ensure
In “A History Of The SAT In 4 Questions”, Cory Turner and Eric Westervelt write about the SAT and how it is changing. The authors discuss the new version of the SAT and how the College Board is going to change things. The Board “hopes the redesign will provide a more accurate measure of a student’s college and career readiness.” (Turner and Westervelt, A History Of The SAT). For example, Cyndie Schmeiser, the chief of assessment of the College Board, says that the new test “will include vocabulary, but within a reading passage.
If the ACT does make a change, it is predicted that the ACT will attempt to stay competitive with the SAT by lowering its standard. While the new SAT does have good points, there are bad points that exist
Over time, the SAT’s format has changed to better measure a student’s ability and potential. Excessive stress is put on students to do well on the SAT’s, and causes them unnecessary strain. As college admissions become more and more competitive, the need for higher test scores has increased, despite fatal flaws in the SAT test itself. Although the SAT is used by thousands of colleges and taken by millions of students, many students' scores do not reflect their true abilities, and therefore the SAT test is useless.
According to Addie Reynolds with Ray-Pec now, Standardized tests take a “big toll” on students' “mental health”. Many students have sleeping problems, get headaches, and have attendance issues. Students' mental health could already be pretty bad, they don't need something to make it even worse. Many colleges/universities do not require Standardized Tests as they did before. SATs are basically an optional test now.
One of the most stressful things of any high school students career is taking the SAT, or the ACT. There are advantages and disadvantages of both tests depending on your abilities. For example, the ACT test questions are more straightforward ,whereas the SAT questions take a little more thought to understand what the question is saying (Princetonreview). On the other other hand, the SAT test is given in ten sections that revolve around subject areas, and the writing portion is given at the beginning of the test. The ACT writing, which is optional yet required by a lot of schools, is at the end of the test and could be a disadvantage if you are feeling very tired.
The act would eliminate “adequate yearly progress”, which under No Child Left Behind, means utilizing standardized each year to determine whether students are proficient in reading and math. This testing often causes teachers to “teach to the test” and forces all children to learn at the same level, whether they are prepared to or not. The act also “empowers states to design school improvement strategies” by limiting federal intervention into underperforming schools by ending the School Improvement Grant Program (SIG). The SIG “contained four federally mandated school ‘turn-around’ models designed by the Obama Administration to prescribe the types of interventions states have to use to improve outcomes at underperforming schools.” The SSA eliminates the SIG program and allows states to put their own improvement strategies in
SATS and ACTS have been used for numerous years as a way to gauge a student’s academic success while in college. Students have the choice which test they would prefer to take and most colleges do not prefer one test over the other. There are a few key differences between the SAT and ACT, which may make one test more suitable than the other for those taking the tests. Many studies have proven that the SAT and ACT are not the best judge of future success, and that colleges should focus their applications more on past grades and accomplishments to decide which students should be accepted to their university. SATs and ACTs are not an effective measure of college readiness and future academic success.
Throughout the college admission process, one indicator of admittance stands above all, the SAT. The SAT stands for the Scholastic Achievement Test, which serves as the standard of assessment for colleges throughout the United States. Known for its pervasiveness, the SAT provides a comparative standard for students’ abilities. Although the SAT provides such a benefit, the SAT unexpectedly poses as a problem for college admission officers throughout the nation due to its inherent negative aspects, which stir a controversy among the nation. The question arises, should we keep using the SAT for admitting students into college?
There has been a yearly ACT for all Junior level students for free since the turn of the century. Taking the ACT can help students actually go to college and enhance their life. When the funds for the test are not there then most of the underprivileged kids do not have the opportunity to go on to college. Funding is an important part of the testing period for those that
For years, standardized testing has been colleges’ favorite way to consider a high school student for admission. One of these tests, and possibly the most commonly known and taken, is the SAT. This school year, the College Board has decided to change the format of the SAT and administered the first round of the new SAT on March 5, 2016. When asked about whether the changes are really necessary, coordinator Olga Henderson stated that “it is difficult to say because this has been the second time that it [the SAT] has been changed.
Standardized tests are very common in today’s modern society. They are used as a tool to measure a person’s performance and indicate how their estimated performance will be in a college class. Every year hundreds of students take the ACT or SAT in order to get accepted into their college of choice and to receive scholarships, but they fail to see the problems with these standardized tests. As more and more people take these tests, the national average score falls causing doubt in the extremely important system. This is leading people to question whether or not the ACT and SATs are accomplishing what they were created to do.
Have you ever wondered if you could just bypass the ACT/SAT and go straight to college? There are many other high schoolers thinking the same. Many students dread taking the ACT/SAT but if we got rid of it you would not be able to see which college is best for you based on how you scored. Many colleges across the world have been toying with the idea of not using tests like the ACT and SAT as part of the admission process. Colleges should not stop using standardized tests as part of the admission process because they have been using them for many decades, they are available to any student worldwide no matter the economic area the student or their family is in, and they allow the student to show what they learned in high school.
The SAT is supposed to judge how well you will do in college but the grades you receive in high school are a better more in tune with how well you will do in college because they recorded the last four years of your education. They show what you have improved on while you grew mentally. The test its self is not made for everyone to take and do well on. It doesn’t morph to anyone and but is better suited for those who are in schools that have more options to prep and call on tutors to improve that persons score. With allowing the SAT to disappear or to let it not have as much effect on a student so they can focus on more important things in
Some people are fighting that the SAT creators saying it ruins their child's chance in getting into the college they wanna go to. In most recent years it has slipped behind the rival, the ACT test which is a shorter exam and less work and somewhat easier to pass, as some people say.
