Furthermore, United States’ support in Vietnam was initially supposed to be limited to training support (source A). As even United States president, Lyndon Johnson, was aware of the potential escalation of the war in Vietnam if American military forces were to involve themselves in the Vietnamese conflict. President Johnsons statement that “… we could get tied down in a third world war” (source A) substantiates the idea that America feared the worldwide consequence of American support in Vietnam (Source A). Contrary to this however,
Many students were taught in their U.S. History class in high school that United States went to war with Vietnam because they wanted to prevent the Vietnam from becoming communists, and if Vietnam were to fall it could result in the whole region of Indochina to become communists (domino theory). In Howard Zinn’s essay gives a different perspective to its readers and he raises questions in minds of his reader such as, “what was the real reason for U.S to invade Vietnam and how come a wealthiest and a powerful country lose war, so miserably against a third world country?” According to Howard Zinn the hidden reason for U.S. entering and supporting French in the Vietnam War was because “Communist had control over all of Southeast Asia, which
In addition to general exhaustion from war, the American people wanted to focus on domestic equality before moving forward with global equality and democracy. Anti-Vietnam War protests were not necessarily unwarranted, as the anti-democracy Tet Offensive of North Vietnam resulted in the deaths of thousands of American soldiers, with the vast majority of states reporting over 100 war casualties in 1968 alone. (Document E) Economically, the Vietnam War was challenging to manage, as the department of defense budget once again rose to today’s equivalent of 450 billion dollars, adding to an already quickly growing, massive national debt. (Document G)
In the context of assessing the persuasiveness of speeches regarding America's involvement in the Vietnam War, two pivotal addresses stand out: President Lyndon B. Johnson's "Speech on Vietnam" and Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam." While both speeches offer distinct perspectives, when considering the context and rhetorical strategies employed, it becomes evident that King's speech is more persuasive in arguing against America's involvement in the conflict. To begin, President Johnson's "Speech on Vietnam" seeks to justify America's military engagement in Vietnam within the framework of Cold War geopolitics. Johnson emphasizes the need to contain the spread of communism in Southeast Asia and defend South Vietnam from aggression, portraying the conflict as vital to safeguarding American interests and global stability. However, Johnson's argument
If countries were to unite with the understanding of the stance of freedom, they could take down the walls that build up communism. As is becoming obvious, the American goal was to assist and help countries in the need of freedom from the barriers and people that were held over them. President Truman emphasizes the importance of freedom during this time. It also stands for our everlasting promise the nation symbolized. In order to keep our promise the nation has to defend South Vietnam from the communist hands.
The Vietnam War is considered one of the most controversial wars in United States history. The United States is one of the greatest superpowers at the time and were seen as the helping hand for doing the right thing. The United States were dragged into this war in order to stop the spread of communism throughout the Democratic South Korea. Many Americans saw this as the United States intervening in another country’s civil war which is not our duty. Americans also used the draft in a poor way affecting the young and African American population.
However, there was also a population of people that supported our involvement. The fear of communism held a very powerful influence over people at the time, especially because of McCarthyism, a fear tactic that had been used a decade earlier. The Red Scare and McCarthyism caused many American people to be paranoid and extremely fearful of communists. By the time of the Vietnam War, communism was a great fear looming over the heads of people like a giant raincloud before a storm. Some people supported US involvement in the war because they believed we needed to fight to defend our freedom.
In World War II, 11.2% of the nation served in four years. In Vietnam, 4.3% served in 12 years. Since 2001, only 0.45% of our population has served in the Global War on Terror. Over time, fewer and fewer people have shouldered more and more of the burden.
Thousands of Americans soldiers died in Vietnam. The war had cost so much that President Johnson was forced to cancel multiple programs including his social reform program. America had failed to contain communism and many people lost confidence in our country. It was nearly 20 years before America again tried to police the world. However, the domino affect was proved wrong because the loss of South Vietnam to communism did not immediately effect what happened in governments of other countries.
The Vietnam War was responsible for the financial hardship in the U.S. Money was spent in the military war because weapons needed to be made. This changed caused shoping rates to increase and started to hurt the economy. This led to economic tensions in the U.S. due to manufactures. The American government spent over billions of dollars. Lyndon B. Johnson and democrats decided to fund federal bank with war cost.
The anti-war movement grew increasingly popular in American society, which led to America lost numerous supporters. Some advocates with peaceful wishes advocated the U.S could withdraw troops sent to fight in the Vietnam Wars for the reason that it would contribute to less human bloodshed and less property damage in the region. Early opposition to U.S. involvement in Vietnam drew its attention in the Geneva Conference of
The United States of America aim, since it became one of the leading World’s powers, was to fight against injustice, inequality, and for freedom of those who were jeopardized. Also, The United States of Americas was fighting for containment of communist power and stopping its spreading. Except joining World War I, with the same aim America got involved in other conflicts such as World War II, The Vietnam War, and many other conflicts. This paper will explain how these principles to fight for freedom, justice, equality and against communism were involved in American international warfare and America’s participation in World War I, World War II and The Vietnam War.
Yes, preventing other countries and their citizens from being taken over by communist rule, was the moral thing to do, but was communist control of Vietnam a threat to our national
North Vietnam has been warned to stay within its borders. It has ignored direction from the international level and warnings from the United States. The Vietcong, North Vietnam forces, has shown deliberate yet deceptive practices in invading and attempting to seize power in South Vietnam. South Vietnam is fighting to remain free. The United States must support the countries quest to remain free from tyranny of the communist regime.
Written by Wystan Hugh Auden in 1940, “As I Walked Out One Evening” is a poem that is complex in many ways, just like Auden was. Born in 1907 England, Auden was from a well-off family, a son to a doctor and a nurse named George and Constance, respectively (#). Raised in a heavily industrialized section of England, Auden was heavily influenced by science and math in his young life (Carpenter #). Up until his career and through his educational career, Auden was interested in the mechanics of the world, how everything worked, but he was not interested in pursuing anything more. He found, after attending college for math and science for a while, that he was more suited for the English language.
