ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Factions

781 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Debate between federalist and anti-federalist

According to The Federalist, there are few methods to go about the issues of factions. In The Federalist, No.10, the pros and cons of the Union are listed; along with some of the adjectives are instability, injustice, and confusion.The main cause is the factions. The factions are are numbers of citizens that amount to either a majority or minority of the whole who are united and actuated by a common impulse of any sort.The methods for curing the mischiefs, the methods for removing the causes of factions are listed in The Federalist, No. 10. The methods for curing the mischiefs of the faction are removing its causes and controlling the effects.There are two other two methods for removing the causes of factions. The first method is destroying liberty. The second method is giving every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests. The issue of ridding of freedom would be worse than having factions. Liberty is essential to the faction’s existence.Liberty is also essential to political life which is essential to faction life, which benefits animal life. The causes of factions are man made. …show more content…

Having a republican government benefits better than the democratic government because of the delegation of the government and the greater number of citizens and greater sphere of country over. Having delegations of the government on one hand, refines and enlarges the public views by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens. Those citizens having wisdom my best discern their true interest of their country and those who have true patriotism and love of justice will be least to sacrifice to temporary and partial considerations. Although the effect may be inverted. People in factions may first obtain the sufferages and then betray the interests of people, if the people are of temper,of local prejudices, or of sinister design by intrigue or

Show More
Related
243 Words | 1 Pages

Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10 Madison addresses the issue of political factions, or parties, and how they are a problem, and how to deal with them. Madison describes factions as like minded people who come together to impose their views on others. The first method Madison proposes is to remove the causes that make the faction, and the second being by controlling its effects. In order to do those things Madison says that we must destroy liberty, and give everyone the same opinions, passions and the interests respectfully. Neither of these ideas would work however because if you destroy liberty just because it gives rise to factions, you would be destroying something that is good just because it has a small side effect that can be seen as

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Both of the factions had hugely different ideals from one another with the Federalist's ideal that having a centralized government was important for the stability

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

James Madison’s main ideas in Federalist 10 were about factions and how to remove the causes but also control the effects. He described a faction as “By a faction, I understand a number if citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community (“The Federalist #10).” Madison was correct in his statements about removing the causes and controlling the effects of factions. During the time Federalist 10 was written the Federalists were using the papers to help convince the states to ratify the Constitution.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

What is the difference between a.. Federalist Paper 10, authored by James Madison, defines factions as groups of people who share similar interests that may infringe upon the rights and overall welfare of their community. According to Madison, these divisive collectives are a result of both human nature and property distribution among

Read More
86 Words | 1 Pages

James Madison states that there are two methods of removing the causes of factions that exist. The first method is by “destroying the liberty” of individuals (Federalist #10). The second method to removing the causes of factions that Madison describes is by bestowing in every citizen identical “opinions, passions and interests” (Federalist #10), or essentially making every individual equal. James Madison explains that if these two methods of removing factions are used, then the basis of the American system, which emphasizes freedom and liberty, is breached.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Madison is analyzing the way to deal with the growing faction problem. He begins his essay by defining factions for the reader. “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

Federalist 10 and the Danger of Majority Faction James Madison proclaims in Federalist 10 that a strong union must be ready to deal with the threat of factions. A faction, under Madison’s definition, is a group that shares an interest that contrasts from the interests of other individuals or groups. Citizens are inclined to voice their concerns and in society “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison believes the American form of popular government is certainly an improvement over the preceding attempts of “both ancient and modern” societies, but the system is still vulnerable to the threats presented

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

James Madison had a very interesting point in which he explained the violence of faction in a government. He considered factions to be unhealthy for democracy so he analyzed the causes and effects of faction, including the unequal distribution of property. Madison points out that when a faction gains power, they use their power to promote their own issues by taking advantage of the minorities. Therefore, he discussed two ways on how to deal with factions such as removing its causes and controlling its effects by destroying liberty and making sure that everyone has the same opinion. But in fact, there is not much we can do about factions because if liberty is destroyed, the whole point of having freedom in a republic would be destroyed as well.

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

The purpose of the five factions is the following: Amity are farmers and counselors, Erudite teachers, Abnegation runs the government, Candor handles the law, and Dauntless are in charge of the city's security. The personality types of factions are Dauntless (the brave), Amity (the peaceful), Erudite (the intelligent), Abnegation (the selfless), and Candor (the honest). No, I do not think that these factions represent every basic personality type and fulfill all the basic needs of people. There are too many other factions that would be needed to fill in the gaps that are needed. Everybody is different, so in all technicality there would need to be hundreds of factions (and maybe even so sub-factions).

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

It states, “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” In simpler terms a faction is another term for an interest group, a group of people with a common interest, such as a political

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

These factions will sound pleasing and great but will have a “real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency” (Washington, 1796). He makes the point that America is about giving power to the people and that these factions can try to destroy that. Every American should follow under the Constitution until or unless America’s people decide to change the Constitution. The Constitution is “sacredly obligatory upon all” (Washington, 1796). While these faction parties look good and seem to have good ideas for the common good, over time they will hurt the Union.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Factions

Related Topics

Open Document