ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Gratuities

649 Words3 Pages

When does a free meal or a cup of coffee become a token of appreciation or become quid pro quo (this for that)? As police chief, I have observed on-duty police officers accepting free meals from our local family-owned restaurants. It is our departments policy that a police officers cannot accept free meals or gifts when on-duty. Since the motive behind accepting the gratuities is unknown, police officers should politely decline, therefore, avoiding any miscommunication that may be behind the free meals. “The ethical quality of an exchange is relative matter, requiring some understanding of the intentions and perceptions of both the giver and the receiver.” (Kania, 2010) In other words, police officers accepting gratuities regularly can …show more content…

Often, offering and accepting gratuities are merely a show of appreciation with no strings attached. Police officers frequenting local business can build relationships with business owners and citizens and gain the respect of the community. On the other hand, accepting gratuities has been seen as a form of bribery or “the slippery slope of corruption”. Many people believe that once a police officer accepts a gratuity that it is the first step towards corruption; that once on that slope the corruption it is difficult to control. Although there are both pros and cons to accepting gratuities, there is a moral dilemma at stake. Is that free meal really free or is it an unspoken IOU for a future favor? …show more content…

Both civilians and police officers sue based on reasons including but not limited to harassment, retaliation, discrimination, coercion, rape, murder and violation of rights. (Wright Risk Management, 2013) Typically most lawsuits are filed at the state level since federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over two types of cases that are federal question cases that arise under federal law. The first case is for wrongfully arrested civilians to collect civil damages, and diverse citizenship over parties, that is if two parties that are in a litigation are in two separate states and what at stake is over $75,000 than the federal court in either state can hear the case. (FindLaw.com, 2013) State courts hear cases of intentional torts (e.g. assault, battery), torts of negligence that includes four basic elements (A duty owed, a breach of duty, causation, and damages), and violation of civil rights-42 U.S.C. sec. 1983, which is the most common and include false arrest, excessive force, and malicious prosecution. Violations under section 1983 can be filed in a state court since federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction. (Jack Ryan, 2006) In order to reduce civil liability training programs should be implemented in order to prevent section 1983 lawsuits. Policies should be reviewed to all officers are up to speed on any changes in law and

Open Document