ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Keeping The Filibuster

1193 Words5 Pages

The US Senate Should Not Keep The Filibuster
The filibuster reform has been a widely debated topic for years. Source sentence. Although some people are in favor of the filibuster, the US Senate should not keep the filibuster because it slows meaningful debate and work, favors the minority vote over the majority, and has racist backgrounds connected to Jim Crow laws.
Those who support the filibuster do so for a variety of reasons. They argue first that the filibuster forces compromise and debate. The supporters of the filibuster also say that the slow movement of legislation increases space for deliberation, allowing senators to pass legislation best representing the will of their constituents. The supporters of the filibuster argue that these …show more content…

During a filibuster, Senate rules allow senators to talk about any subject they choose, which means people can actually just waste as much time as they want, slowing or even worse, halting actual debate. "...in 1935, Senator Huey Long (D, Louisiana) had recited a salad dressing recipe and explained how to fry oysters during a 15-hour-long filibuster attempt to require Senate confirmation for a new federal agency established amid the Great Depression" ("The Filibuster"). This shows the filibuster's ridiculous mockery of the US Senate and eliminating debate over actual issues. The Senate, representing the people of the United States, is supposed to be having purposeful debate discussing the topic at hand, not going off-topic and derailing law-passing when days and weeks really do matter. Today's filibuster halts any debate, causing laws to be stuck for weeks without discussion. The Filibuster is not used to increase thinking time and thought about the issue of the bill at hand but to severely decrease discussion time. "Moreover, a Jan. 2022 study found that not only do filibusters not increase the meaningful debate as defenders claim, but they serve to dampen debate. The study showed that in 2007 when Senate Republicans increased the use of the filibuster, there was a fairly immediate 14% decline in debate. Three legislative sessions later, the debate had declined 28%" …show more content…

The Senators who represent 20% of all Americans can override any legislation brought to the senate, which means they are canceling something that affects 80% of all other Americans. "Because ending a filibuster requires a 60-senator majority vote, just 41 conservative senators (the number of senators needed to protect a filibuster) in the 117th Senate who represent just over 20% of the American population can kill any and all legislation brought by the party voted in to control the Senate, House, and White House" (ProCon.org). If the majority of American people agree on an issue, the U.S system of democracy says the majority vote wins. This is different when a filibuster is because the senators representing only 20% can stop a bill or law from being passed. "By allowing members of a minority party to sidetrack or stop bills that have the support of a majority of senators, critics of the filibuster contend, the tactic gives the minority in the Senate a more powerful role than the authors of the Constitution intended. 'By imposing their will on the Senate, the nerve center of American government, a minority of senators found they could impose their will on the entire nation'" (CITATION). The original founders of our country did not intend for the minority ideas and beliefs of the senate to influence the entire United States. If a majority says that a bill or law

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of US Senator Shelley Moore Caprito

875 Words | 4 Pages

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va), a member of the Joint Resolutions Committee, released the following statement on the committees decision not to pass the Efficient Legislature Amendment. “During the last session of the Joint Resolutions Committee, Democrats have once again undermined our legislature and by extension, our country as a whole. This amendment proposed a change to the Senate rules to establish a set amount of time that bills in committee could stand without any action. The goal of this proposal was to increase the efficiency of the committee process in the Senate and ensure that action will be taken on bills that directly help our nation. As it stands, bills that have been referred to committees

Read More

Assignment 2: Unit Four-State Hearing

562 Words | 3 Pages

Abolishing the filibuster could result in similar congressional errs becoming

Read More

Sinclair Unorthodox Law Making

554 Words | 3 Pages

The legislation was considered by several committees in the house, and in both chambers, compromises arrived at through informal processes altered the bills after the committees reported their legislation… In the Senate, the real possibility of a filibuster shaped the process, making it necessary of Majority leader Mitchell to build through negotiations an oversized coalition. (Sinclair 3). This evolution in the legislative process could be a result of congress manipulating the rules to achieve goals in informal ways.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Filibuster In Modern Congress

547 Words | 3 Pages

Modern congress and its members seem largely concerned and focused on partisan advancements. Though there are many reasons as to why the enormous division in congress is as it is, there is one factor that draws the most attention. Filibuster an action that is used by most congressmen and women to delay the passage of laws, has increasingly over the course of time become a negative action rather than positive. The use of mostly long speeches as ways to prohibit and hinder bills or laws is now being used by many senators to advance personal and party goals thus, it is crucial that the ban of filibuster must be considered and replaced with the simple majority rule. First and foremost, some reasons as to why filibuster should be exempted from

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlock

666 Words | 3 Pages

An example of this would be Gun Control laws. Gun control laws have been at a gridlock since 1999, after the massacre at Columbine High School. The House and Senate are constantly against each other on this topic. One side wants to implement gun control laws, meanwhile the other wants to leave it as is. Neither side can get enough votes to pass it, so they are stuck at a stalemate, or at least they were.

Read More

Federalist Papers Fifty-Five, Sixty-Three Analysis

535 Words | 3 Pages

The Senate is also important because each Senator serves six years in office making it difficult for them to “yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions” and allows them to gain experience and make minimal to no errors (pg. 337). Federalist Paper Sixty-Three emphasizes that having Senators serve six years allows them to be more responsible of the decisions they take while in office. James Madison wrote “It is evident that an assembly elected for so short a term as to be unable to provide more than one or two links in a chain of measures” (pg. 338).

Read More

Filibusters In The Senate: Manipulative Analysis

317 Words | 2 Pages

Although some believe filibusters in the Senate can be a manipulative interpretation of the constitution, and a waste of time, they are in fact necessary to American democracy to protect the interests of American people and to open the discussion for negotiation on legislation. Filibusters in the senate protect the rights of American citizen’s by allowing a faction of people to shut down legislation they believe to be deficient. On September 24th, 2013 Ted Cruz started the second longest filibuster in American history in efforts to sway the Senate to repeal funding for The Affordable Care Act. Cruz felt as though “it is not working” and “it would be a huge burden” to the working class (Ted Cruz 2013). His filibuster was successful in shutting

Read More

Examples Of Change Doesn T Come From Presidents By Aziz Ansari

168 Words | 1 Pages

So the large groups need to scare the president enough that he will change what they want, or the president needs to agree with the people and make the change. An example of this is the Emancipation Proclamation. Technically Abraham Lincoln signed the papers that helped lead to the freedom of slaves, but would he have done it, if it weren't for many angry people asking

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

1098 Words | 5 Pages

Congressional gridlock is not an uncommon thing in congress. Congressional gridlock happens when there is difficulty passing a law that is trying to satisfy the needs of the people. Gridlock often makes us feel stuck. Neither political party can reach an agreement to enforce a law on an issue, therefore they continue to meet and discuss until a conclusion is made. Gridlock is also referred to as “deadlock” or “political stalemate” because it is almost as if there is nothing either party can do.

Read More

Overview Of The Obstruction Handbook By Sir John A. Macdonald

1888 Words | 8 Pages

However, party identities are hand picking the leader of government and opposition in the Senate so they can continue to tow the party line by minimizing debate and public commentary so that senators will act in the interest of the party line to pass legislation (Forsey 2015). The Conservative party in 2007 used a tactic called the “obstruction handbook” which was a way to promote their party line agenda by selecting witnesses and coaching them so they will contribute to the party line discussion (Forsey 2015). The most concerning idea of the “obstruction handbook” was how it coached senators to effectively disrupt committee proceedings, shut them down, and make sure no committee answers are ever recorded or portrayed in the media (Forsey 2015). This is another way the Senate is unaccountable to the Canadian people because the party whips are using tactics to persuade senators to follow the party line rather than the Canadian citizens’ interests. Public consultations in committees are very important because it allows for Canadian citizens to talk about the effects a bill may have on their community.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Term Limits

313 Words | 2 Pages

As the Arkansas State Senate Majority Leader, I understand that there are many controversial concerns regarding the idea of a Constitutional Convention and the thought of setting term limits for a our members of Congress. I have thoroughly weighed the pros and cons of having such said Constitutional Convention and I believe that our nation can benefit from the meeting. As for the proposal to change the amendment in regards to Congress member term limits, it took much deliberation before I could fully take a stance concerning this topic. Of course, the change of term limits would greatly affect our nation, but the question is, “Would the benefits outweigh the risks?” When thinking of ways to oppose this topic, I found that numerous people believe

Read More

Bipartisanship Essay

550 Words | 3 Pages

The reason for that is that the legislation process has some form of debate so parties make good quality bills that doesn’t grant the ills of both parties on the bill. Both sides shouldn’t get what they want and should be able to come to an agreement that suits both sides of

Read More

Arguments Against Congressional Activism

124 Words | 1 Pages

Lawmakers rarely interrelate straightforwardly with other states on strategy, but the laws that Congress Senate approves, can influence

Read More

Filibuster Effects

672 Words | 3 Pages

Today, the filibuster is a common scene in the U.S. Senate. It has been in practice for over 150 years, defending the minority against the majority vote. Measures to limit filibusters are implemented in Congress currently, including Woodrow Wilson’s

Read More

Essay On Divided Government

503 Words | 3 Pages

Attempting to enact significant legislation requires Congress and the White House to compromise and anticipate what others will approve of and pass. When a bill successfully passes both houses of Congress, which has become increasingly difficult due to party polarization and radical groups within the House of Representatives and the Senate, it then goes to the president for signing. This is a lengthy process, and in order for groups of people with opposing views to settle in agreement on a measure, a great deal of negotiation is often required. This can result in a piece of legislation that is a compromised, diluted version of its original form that is not an effective solution to the initial problem. Vague, weak legislation often necessitates further action by the other two branches of government in order to interpret and execute it properly.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Keeping The Filibuster

Related Topics

Open Document