ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Filibuster In Modern Congress

547 Words3 Pages

Modern congress and its members seem largely concerned and focused on partisan advancements. Though there are many reasons as to why the enormous division in congress is as it is, there is one factor that draws the most attention. Filibuster an action that is used by most congressmen and women to delay the passage of laws, has increasingly over the course of time become a negative action rather than positive. The use of mostly long speeches as ways to prohibit and hinder bills or laws is now being used by many senators to advance personal and party goals thus, it is crucial that the ban of filibuster must be considered and replaced with the simple majority rule. First and foremost, some reasons as to why filibuster should be exempted from …show more content…

When carefully analyzed, the history behind filibuster started off with good intentions. Filibuster in the past made sure that not just any law proposed was passed as well as the fact that it somehow helped parties along the way. The main issue now is that, Filibuster instead of being used correctly and in the right moments, now has one main use which is furthering party agenda or personal goals. In recent years, there has been many cases where filibuster has been used when it shouldn't have. Cases including but not limited to the paycheck fairness Act which would have ensured the provision of equal pay regardless of gender, the gun control bill that would have required

Open Document