ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of US Senator Shelley Moore Caprito

875 Words4 Pages

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va), a member of the Joint Resolutions Committee, released the following statement on the committees decision not to pass the Efficient Legislature Amendment. “During the last session of the Joint Resolutions Committee, Democrats have once again undermined our legislature and by extension, our country as a whole. This amendment proposed a change to the Senate rules to establish a set amount of time that bills in committee could stand without any action. The goal of this proposal was to increase the efficiency of the committee process in the Senate and ensure that action will be taken on bills that directly help our nation. As it stands, bills that have been referred to committees that …show more content…

Of the bills passed, I personally voted in favor of amendments D2, R2, and I8. D2 proposed to adopt an electronic roll call system in the Senate and to reduce the cloture threshold on nominations to three-fifths of members voting. This change would prevent events like when Senator Tuberville single-handedly blocked hundreds of military nominations. Nominations such as these should not be able to be prevented by one member for political reasons, but rather these nominations should be about ensuring that the nominees will work for the good of America. Amendment R2 eliminated the “two speech rule” of the Senate, in which members were not permitted to speak more than twice about a single question without leaving the Senate. There should be no limit on the ability for Senators to discuss questions and bills on the floor. It’s in these discussions on the floor where bills and resolutions are examined and amended in order to pass bills and resolutions that serve the interests of the American people. I8, introduced by Representative Stefanik, requires the appointment of a conference committee to discuss disagreements, and to report back to the House or Senate with a definite resolution. This will allow for more efficiency and productivity in the Chamber by reducing the amount of time spent on one disagreement on the

Show More
Related

Wgu S311 Task 2

434 Words | 2 Pages

Collectively, we urge your support for S3111 and respectfully ask for the bill to be posted for a vote in the Senate Budget Committee. We applaud Senator Gill for the introduction of S3111 and Senator Kean and Beach for signing on as co-sponsors of the bill. S3111 was passed out of the Senate Commerce Committee with unanimous support. We urge the members of the Budget Committee to lend their support for successful passage of S3111.

Read More

Assignment 2: Unit Four-State Hearing

562 Words | 3 Pages

Abolishing the filibuster could result in similar congressional errs becoming

Read More

Sinclair Unorthodox Law Making

554 Words | 3 Pages

The legislation was considered by several committees in the house, and in both chambers, compromises arrived at through informal processes altered the bills after the committees reported their legislation… In the Senate, the real possibility of a filibuster shaped the process, making it necessary of Majority leader Mitchell to build through negotiations an oversized coalition. (Sinclair 3). This evolution in the legislative process could be a result of congress manipulating the rules to achieve goals in informal ways.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Canadian Senate Reform

1032 Words | 5 Pages

, Reference re Senate Reform 2014,

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Filibuster In Modern Congress

547 Words | 3 Pages

Modern congress and its members seem largely concerned and focused on partisan advancements. Though there are many reasons as to why the enormous division in congress is as it is, there is one factor that draws the most attention. Filibuster an action that is used by most congressmen and women to delay the passage of laws, has increasingly over the course of time become a negative action rather than positive. The use of mostly long speeches as ways to prohibit and hinder bills or laws is now being used by many senators to advance personal and party goals thus, it is crucial that the ban of filibuster must be considered and replaced with the simple majority rule. First and foremost, some reasons as to why filibuster should be exempted from

Read More

How Does Senator Joseph R. Mccarthy Uphold His Responsibilities As A Senator

801 Words | 4 Pages

A senator’s first two responsibilities are to attend meetings and to address the concerns of their constituents (Leviticus, 2017). The importance of meeting attendance is its the only way to revise bills

Read More

Senate Filibusters

979 Words | 4 Pages

Additionally, Congress can exercise oversight on a federal bureau by means of funding, and lastly, casework can affect a member 's attention to legislation based on the ideologies of his or her constituents, as well as how time consuming it is. A senate filibuster can allow a senator who opposes a bill to prevent or delay its passing. The opposing senator can debate indefinitely, even if what he or she is saying has nothing to do with the bill. This usually will prevent a bill from being passed, even if it has a enough votes to pass, as it is difficult to stop a filibuster because of the 60 vote

Read More

How Congress Works And Why You Should Care By Lee Hamilton

1122 Words | 5 Pages

Ever since the creation of Congress, it has not been uncommon to hear or see negative criticisms about it. Congress has evolved from when it was created, but the role it plays has not changed. Even though there are many criticisms about the ways on how Congress is run, the system is an important and essential part of the United States government. Integral it may be, but today, many people find it difficult to answer the questions of how Congress works, what it does, and why it exists. In Lee Hamilton’s How Congress Works and Why you Should Care, the author shows what Congress actually does do and how it affects the American people every single day.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Keeping The Filibuster

1193 Words | 5 Pages

The US Senate Should Not Keep The Filibuster The filibuster reform has been a widely debated topic for years. Source sentence. Although some people are in favor of the filibuster, the US Senate should not keep the filibuster because it slows meaningful debate and work, favors the minority vote over the majority, and has racist backgrounds connected to Jim Crow laws.

Read More

Filibustering In The Chamber Of Congress

852 Words | 4 Pages

A rule only in the Senate that stalls a bill from being passed is called Filibustering. Filibustering is the act in which one senator “acts in an obstructive manner in a legislature, especially by speaking at inordinate length.” The senator is essentially stalling time before the bill is passed or voted on. Another difference between the Chambers of Congress, which can allow legislation to be passed in one chamber and not the other is that, the House of Representatives has a very powerful Rules Committee, and the Senate does not. Though the Senate has a Rules Committee, it is not as powerful as the House of Representatives.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

1486 Words | 6 Pages

Congressional gridlock has become the norm in the highly polarised political climate in the United States. As a result of the unending stalemates, America’s chief law making body can no longer muster the capacity to make laws. As argued by Sweeny (2017), congressional gridlock weakens or undercuts the numerous principles that in total establish and maintain America’s governmental structure. Abramowitz (2010) notes that congressional gridlock mainly impends the vital or fundamental principles of legislative supremacy and separation of powers. This is the case as any gridlock makes it possible for the arbitrary exercise of government power as well as bringing about the problem of arbitrary inaction (Bonica, 2013).

Read More

Arguments Concerning The Use Of Filibusters In The United States

610 Words | 3 Pages

The first article of the Constitution states that Congress has the power to determine the rules of its proceedings. This means that the Houses are responsible for their own rules, as long as they follow the Constitution. The Senate could use this power for good and use it to better the law-making process. Instead, the Senate uses it to waste time, instead of using it to try to pass a law that could better America. Filibusters are commonly used to put the Senate members' personal beliefs above bettering the country, and that is why they can be very detrimental.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Obamacare

1236 Words | 5 Pages

Putting a limit to the rules or being able to veto what they do if enough votes were collected would be good protection against certain bias officials. These would be the best recommendations for the state as a change in these will really make it easier for the Senate, organizations, remaining republicans, and the rest of the world to agree

Read More

Filibuster Effects

672 Words | 3 Pages

Today, the filibuster is a common scene in the U.S. Senate. It has been in practice for over 150 years, defending the minority against the majority vote. Measures to limit filibusters are implemented in Congress currently, including Woodrow Wilson’s

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Filibusters

1586 Words | 7 Pages

Filibustering in the Senate has its origin back to “the 1850s” (“Filibuster and Cloture”), yet many landmark filibusters happened in the 20th century. For instance, in 1957 “South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond spoke continuously for twenty- four hours and eighteen minutes to prevent the passage of civil rights legislation. Thurmond still holds the record for the longest filibuster” (English 110). However, because of the time- consuming characteristic of filibusters, debates over changing the regulations to curtail

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of US Senator Shelley Moore Caprito

Open Document