Conclusion Patrick Henry’s speech was very powerful and moving for numerous reasons. First, he used a correct blend of logical and emotional appeals. Adding on, he used allusion to allow the audience to compare their situations to other situations, and rhetorical questions to get them to really think about the topic at hand. Also, his occasion, tone, and purpose of the speech all was appropriate for their status at the time. Over all, Patrick Henry’s speech was stronger than Jonathan Edward’s speech whose main issue was his tone, taking away his emotion and his purpose of the sermon.
After reading both sets of arguments made by Alexander Hamilton and Patrick Henry in regards to the constitution, their main points are as follows. Patrick Henry strongly felt as though the states should remain separate. He was not pleased with the idea that the constitution was giving the authority to be adapted by the people as opposed to the states, therefore insinuating the possibility of the states losing rights that they might have or ha. Henry was also opposed to the idea that the constitution did nothing to secure the rights of the people. Hamilton’s argument in Federalist 23 are pretty clear that the only way to properly preserve liberty is by creating a strong central government as proposed by the constitution.
The birth of Henry Tudor, later known as Henry VIII, took place on June 28th, 1491, in London, England. He was one of 6 other siblings born to Henry VII and Elizabeth York, but only 3 of his siblings survived their childhood. Though Henry’s brother, Arthur, was expected to ascend to the throne, he died at the young age of 15, leaving the throne to Henry. When Henry was 17 years old, he married Arthur’s widow, Catherine of Aragon, after Pope Julius II granted a dispensation to Catherine’s previous marriage on grounds that it had not been consummated. They remained married for 24 years until Henry divorced her because she was unable to give him a male heir, which was incredibly important because of the War of Roses that lasted 30 years, of which nobody wanted a duplicate.
King Louis XIV was not a great leader, but certainly better than both King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. He held many unsuccessful campaigns and waged many wars between him and the Dutch. But despite being hungry for military power, Louis XIV established reforms that cut France’s deficit and promoted industrial growth. And he also managed to restore France’s disorganized taxation system. For these reasons, King Louis XIV would be the best French ruler to live under.
Edmond Pendleton and Patrick Henry both have their own justified reasons as to why ratification should or should not exist. Pendleton believes in ratification and Henry objects to ratification. Pendleton believes in ratification to keep the peace and order among citizens, Pendleton also believes that no society can exist without peace and order. “It is the interest of the federal [government] to preserve the state governments; upon the latter the existence immediately from the state legislatures; and the representatives and the president are elected under their direction and control; they also preserve order among the citizens of their respective states, and without order and peace no society can possibly exist.” With this statement Pendleton
It was his duty as king to develop and protect his realm, expand his empire, cultivate his domain, propagate his culture, establish laws, and gather wealth. (Doc A, Doc
In the years of 1509 through 1547 England was changing drastically due to their ruler King Henry VIII. There was dived in England between Protestant against Catholics. At this time in England the Catholic Church was the supreme religious authority meaning it controlled everything. Kings were only allowing to rule with the blessing from the Pope. Rulers were also not allowed to make drastic decisions without the counsel of the Church.
When you develop the culture, he gives the citizens more pride. And the politics, he wanted everyone to have a say in the leadership of their country. He wanted everyone to able to participate in elections, and he wanted the heads of state that sat in the
Henry V was born in England's most aristocratic family around 1386-1387, and built his way up to the throne at the age of 26, succeeding his father as the King of England in 1413. The experiences Henry learned in his youth helped him win the War of Agincourt. Early on Henry V matured and was very clever. When Henry V was a young man, he fought in many battles, one them being [Shrewsbury], and commanded troops. In the biographical article “Henry V and the Battle of Agincourt” the writer goes deep into Henry V's prior life in his youth, to help lead his troops.
Gentlemen of the court I, Henry the VIII, will explain to you why the Church of England was the most beneficial Church created during the Reformation time period. It is not only important to view the merits of my own Church, but the merits of my life as a King and Supreme head of the Church of England. My Church became, that of a mediator for the rest of the populations religion. The old system, that of the Roman Catholic Church was more constricted when it came to religious tolerance. This prevented a religious civil war from breaking out, much like it did in the Holy Roman empire.
Throughout the period of 1509 – 1603 there were four Tudor monarchs who each encountered many issues during their reign from varying different factors. Unrest is defined as a state of dissatisfaction, disturbance, and agitation, typically involving public demonstrations or disorder which was something that was frequently encountered during the Tudor period. It is common for that when a new monarch inherits the crown there are small changes to the law and the way the country is ruled, however it is not common for there to be consecutive monarchs with different religions which therefore affect the religion of the country. Religion during the early modern era was a highly important subject for the majority of society and therefore created chaos
His political authority grew stronger as the years went on therefore, he “attained supreme power by universal consent.” He did this by gaining the peoples respect. The people loved him so much that gave him the title of “father of the country.” Which showed how much they truly adored
King Henry VIII sought to protect his dignity by sustaining the Tudor reign. He was both prideful and greedy in character; which is supported by his determination in producing a male heir. He was so determined, he was willing to do anything - including betraying, divorcing and beheading his wives. In addition, Henry VIII was a strong participant in the Feudal System. Life in the Medieval castle was directed by the pyramid-shaped Feudal System.
Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.
Task 2 - Informative Essay Intro: hook, quote, then thesis Body 1: Life Henry VIII was born on June 28, 1491, in Greenwich. Henry presided over the beginnings of the English Renaissance and the English Reformation. Henry VIII was the second son of King Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. Henry’s personality included a lot of intelligence, learning,and curiosity which impressed the ambassadors that were in his court.
