ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing

1203 Words5 Pages

In the world of public policy and legislation, the question of whether or not to require drug testing for welfare patients is divisive and emotionally charged. Both sides fight hand and foot for their side, and the end result is a vicious battle for legal authority. Laws requiring drug testing for welfare patients are also becoming more popular. As of May 2016, at least 17 states were in the process of creating drug testing legislation for welfare patients, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Some of the pros to drug testing for welfare patients would be, Prudent use of taxpayer dollars. Few individuals whose taxes fund the welfare system would be amenable to the idea of their tax dollars helping individuals on welfare buy drugs, and so advocates of mandatory drug …show more content…

Mandatory drug testing helps identify individuals who can benefit from substance abuse treatment so they can receive help and will, according to drug testing advocates, save money in the long-term. Alternative drug testing methodologies exist. Even if wholesale drug testing of all welfare applicants is not proving to be cost-effective, it is possible to restructure policy so that, for example, only individuals who are suspected of drug abuse will be tested. Precedent in the job market. Members of state legislatures have argued that drug testing is often required by employers, so it is reasonable to also require drug testing for welfare patients. Discouraging long-term welfare use. Adding more requirements for keeping benefits encourages individuals to find work and escape the paperwork and other necessities of maintaining welfare. These include the fact that this move could possibly save the government money by taking drug addicts off welfare programs. Some also see it as extra incentive for those in lower socioeconomic classes to stay off drugs in the first

Show More
Related
1814 Words | 8 Pages

Our social work values support assisting clients to overcome barriers, not automatically judging people for their struggles and taking punitive action. We know that addiction is an illness that is not easy to overcome, even if you place a monetary value on recovery. Our proposed policy will allow clients to gain from the opportunity and accessibility to treatment. In theory, providing treatment to substance abusers will save taxpayers money because the individuals will have an increased ability to contribute to society and find employment. What Ethical Dilemmas Does Alternative Policy Raise for You as a Professional Social Worker?

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

He claims the testing will be used to better prepare individuals for the workplace and rehabilitate those, testing positive for drugs, with state funded treatment plans (Scott Walkers Light …).

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It is not intended for people to abuse it and spend it on illegal activities that can worsen their health and ruin the lives of other around them. People who give their money to welfare want to see the money be put to proper use. This task is nearly impossible while they’re drugs involved. Getting people out of bad habits/harmful activities should be a large goal for welfare. The idea of drug testing welfare recipients came from the idea of not wasting taxpayers money (Cunha).

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

In my opinion participants of any welfare program should be drug tested no matter the circumstance, but where will they get the money to fund the drug tests. The money will be taken out of the tax payers, which means taxes will eventually go up overtime. Drug testing the participants will decrease the amount of people getting welfare. I have seen people that will receive the help but they are on drugs, or abusing the

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

Anybody who is on drugs needs help to get off of them, and the welfare recipients would receive free help. The taxpayers that work for their money do not want to see their taxes go somewhere of no use. Welfare recipients that have been regularly drug-tested drug usage goes down. Drug testing welfare recipients would be beneficial to both the taxpayers and the welfare recipients. The taxpayers would feel more secure that their payments are not going to waste, and the welfare recipients

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Welfare recipients should not be required to complete a drug test if other people receiving government

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

The state of Florida has already implemented the drug testing on welfare recipients. By doing so the amount of applicants has gone down about 48 percent. The decrease of applicants is due to the drug users that simply do not apply because of the testing. The users could apply for welfare in the future but they must refrain from the partaking in the illegal activity which is drugs. In 2013 the state of Missouri there was over 30,000 welfare applicants drug screened and they found the little to no people failed the tests.

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

Welfare Recipients should be drug tested. Welfare is a public assistance program designed to help people who are not able to support themselves at the given time. The Welfare Information site states that welfare can also be defined as a financial assistance to impoverished individuals which is suppled through the taxes paid by the working class. This means that welfare improves the quality of life and how the poor and underprivileged live.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Drug testing individuals is not worth the money in the end because most people will not test positive. Most people tend to forget that most people receiving aid also are taxpayers. In 2010, nearly half the poor mother or near poor mothers were at least working part time (Cunha). If the people receiving aid are paying for the drug tests to they would probably rather keep that money then have it be wasted. Drug testing recipients is a waste of money since the government would be wasting more money on giving the tests then they would be

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

One of those reasons being, drug testing welfare recipients could waste taxpayer’s money. The government would use tax money to administer drug test (Cunha, par. 3). Many taxpayers do not feel like they are obligated to pay for a person’s drug habit (“Editorial: Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Doesn’t Add Up,” par. 1). In Tennessee, only one person to the 800 who applied for government assistance tested positive for drugs. In Florida, during four months of drug testing , only 2.6 % of welfare recipients tested positive, which was under Florida’s illegal use of 8%, which meant that fewer people using government assistance used drugs.

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

If the government were to catch people using the money for drugs they would be taken out of the system and put into rehab or expelled from the welfare program, which proves that in the long run welfare recipients should be required to perform and pass a positive drug test to continue to receive welfare

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

Denying Drug Testing On Welfare Recipients Mortification is the only word that can come to mind when thinking of drug testing. Drug testing doesn’t seem to be for the better of the people, it seems that it’s just there to humiliate them. Welfare people have enough issues going on that the government shouldn’t be wasting taxpayers money, breaking their own constitution, or offending the people they are sworn to protect. Protect the people and their rights. Serve them with the same respect as they want as people themselves.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

I want to know, how many times are you forced to do something humiliating and demoralizing just so that you can put food on the table? Anyone that isn’t using public assistance probably isn't raising their hand. Recently, state legislators have been introducing legislation that require drug-testing people who receive public assistance. This drug testing is unconstitutional and unfair to the poor. Everyone should get drug tested for jobs not only the poor people.

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

The same written words on a page can affect different people in different ways while at the same time connecting people through the love of literature. Words are timeless and give us the opportunity to enter into a new, old world that existed before us. Many stories have been able to survive through generations in order to keep the spirit of the past alive and well, which is why Thoreau described the written word as the “choicest of relics”. The intimacy Thoreau speaks of is the connection each individual reader draws the the words on the page to their own life, which creates a bond between the reader and the author’s words. However, in addition to being able to apply those words to your personal life, those words are universal in the way that

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

I am here to persuade you that making welfare harder to obtain will not only positively affect those who apply, but our nation in a wide-scale socio-economic aspect. C. Preview of Main Points: I will explain where the government gets the money to fund programs, specifically TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). Personal and socio-economic benefit will be explained. D. Benefit Instead of using money to fund drug use, money will be better spent in other areas within the states. The incentives to stop

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing

Related Topics

Open Document