Pros And Cons Of Passive Euthanasia

537 Words3 Pages

Consenting adults who are at the end of their life and experiencing unbearable pain have another option than to just bear with the pain and die, they can request to take part in physician-assisted death if they live in a certain state or country. (Downar) Physician assisted death consists of euthanasia and assisted suicide.
Euthanasia can be separated into to two groups it can be active or passive; the two groups can be split into three more sections: voluntary, involuntary, or non-voluntary. In passive euthanasia as a whole a patient should receive life-supporting therapy and if they don’t it often results in their death. Voluntary passive euthanasia is when a person refuses life-supporting therapy or is withdrawn if they are currently in a therapy session. Involuntary passive euthanasia is when life-supporting therapy is withheld from the patient against their wishes. non-voluntary euthanasia is if a patient has a life threating illness and cannot communicate with the doctors and the doctors think withdrawing the patient from life supporting therapy is the best choice. For the most part, passive euthanasia is legal and usually …show more content…

When the patient requests a meeting or an intervention and informs the doctor that he wants to die this is considered voluntary active euthanasia. When the patient does not want to die it is considered involuntary active euthanasia. Non-voluntary active euthanasia is when the doctors are unsure of the patient’s wishes. On the other hand assisted suicide is when a physician prescribes a lethal dose of a drug to a patient and they voluntarily take the drug, knowing it will kill them. To take this route the patient must be able to go through a physiatrist’s examination to reassure that they are not crazy or depressed. This form of Physician assisted death is also not widely accepted.