Pros And Cons Of Peta

1852 Words8 Pages

The typical America meal most likely will contain one choice of meat, a vegetable of some sort, and a starch. These are all viable options in which we choose to eat everyday of our lives, we have endless choices at our fingertips. For those who choose to refrain from eating meat, there are now alternatives for anything one can think of. PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) supports the movement to become vegetarian and even vegan. They offer viable information about the treatment of animals and the benefit of this lifestyle change. Contrary to that, there are a plethora of supporters of the non-vegetarian movement, people such as Lierre Keith, who wrote the Vegetarian Myth. In this book, Keith discusses the negative effects of taking part in this vegetarian lifestyle. As a compromise, the public must be educated on the pros and cons of eating meat or of being a vegetarian, as well as being educated on what exactly is being put into their meat. In a world where food production is rapidly changing the choice to eat meat or not is one to be considered based off of which the consumer provides better nutrients. Many may assert that a vegetarian lifestyle is not healthy for the human body because it will deprive it of vital nutrients such as protein, iron, zinc, and so forth. Or, that just eating vegetables will not …show more content…

In Keith’s first chapter entitled “Why This Book” he touches on the idea of how vegetarians feel that they are doing the environment good by not eating meat.
“The truth is that agriculture is the most destructive thing humans have done to the planet, and more of the same won’t save us. The truth is that agriculture requires the wholesale destruction of entire ecosystems. The truth is that life isn’t possible without death, that no matter what you eat, someone has to die to feed