ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

481 Words2 Pages

The new constitution couldn’t please everyone. Some people liked it but some didn't. The two sides were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, whereas the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. They would have debates about ratifying the Constitution. They needed to debate in each state to decide if the state was voting for or against the Constitution and the new government. The Anti-Federalists thought the new Constitution gave the Federal government too much power over the states. They believed that Congress was given an absurd amount of power as well. Anti-Federalists figured the powers of the branches wouldn’t be separated well. The Anti-Federalists believed the Executive branch overruled the other two branches of government. They also thought the rights of the people should be listed. This is to ensure that people can’t be unfairly accused over something they have the right to do or say. …show more content…

They stated that the separation of powers would stay in place. This means that the Executive branch couldn’t have too much power over the other branches. They also argued against the listing of the rights. The Federalists believed that listing the rights could be bad. They said that they couldn’t list all of the rights. This means that people wouldn’t have a set group of rights. It would also be hard to keep track of them. People could also violate the rights that aren’t listed. Anti- Federalists responded pleading that we should have listed rights so that we couldn’t ignore them. Simply put, the Federalists thought listing the rights would be dangerous, but the Anti-Federalists did

Show More
Related

Explain What Objections To The Constitution Were Held By Such Anti Federalists

918 Words | 4 Pages

The Anti-Federalists thought that one specific set of rules for the whole population would not fully represent everyone’s rights. Furthermore, the Anti-Federalists thought that if a government took place far from the people, they would no longer represent

Read More

To What Extent And How Did The Anti-Federalists Agree On A New Constitution

1024 Words | 5 Pages

Jake, Kiara, Miah, and Danny Unit 2 Question 1 How did the Anti-Federalists and Federalists agree on a new Constitution? Delegates met at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787 to amend the Articles of Confederation. The idea of having a strong national government divided people either in support or against the new Constitution. Anti-Federalists voiced their objections to the proposed Constitution as they feared a strong central government.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

468 Words | 2 Pages

After the Revolutionary War the thirteen colonies wanted a government to replace the British system they wanted overthrown. So they came up with the Articles of Confederation. The articles went into effect in 1781, but were short lived because they had too many flaws in them to work effectively. Even though they went into effect there was still a problem the colonies had and that was that they had no real national leadership.

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

1637 Words | 7 Pages

The Anti-Federalists were too trepid in their allocation of power. Under an Anti-Federalists executive, there would be largely no power held by the executive. However, evidenced by The Articles of Confederation there is a necessity for a strong executive who can execute the laws forcefully. The Anti-Federalists believed in weakening the executive as much as possible. However, many of their methods are not viable options.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Amending The Constitution

490 Words | 2 Pages

At the end of the Revolutionary war, the former colonies were united under Articles of Confederation that loosely bound the new states into a nation. Because of disputes between the states, a constitutional convention was called to improve the Articles of Confederation. Instead of amending the Articles of Confederation, the representatives at the convention decided to create an entirely new document, the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution established a form of government that balanced power between three branches of government and provided for self-governing states. The Federalists were a political group who supported the Constitution.

Read More

Comparison Of The Articles Of Confederation And US Constitution

1417 Words | 6 Pages

The Anti-Federalists ensured the Constitution gave the focal government an over the top measure of imperativeness, and without a Bill of Rights, the general open would be in risk of

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Institutionalized Essay

1783 Words | 8 Pages

Their belief was that the government would have too much power. The Anti-Federalists were satisfied with the way the Constitution was. The Anti-federalists thought that states should have more rights, that there should be a Bill of rights. They

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

702 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti-Federalist argued against the idea of a powerful national government, which would limit the powers of the state. One other key argument made by the Anti-Federalist emphasized the need for a bill of rights. Anti-Federalist feared that with the lack of a bill of rights, the Constitution would not

Read More

Anti Federalism Dbq

175 Words | 1 Pages

While the federalist and anti-federalist had opposing views in a functioning government system, some crucial points were agreed upon. They both knew in order for the United States to succeed as a new country, they needed better stability and a sense of unity between the colonies. The Articles of Confederation, on both sides, were thought of as a weak system of governmental control. A central government appealed to both sides, but as to how much power it would possess was still at a still point. Federalist wanted a strong central government, whereas anti-federalists were afraid of it seeming too much like the British monarchy.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Democratic Republicans Vs Federalists

610 Words | 3 Pages

They hoped to use the power of the constitution to unite the quarreling states. They also wanted to keep order amid the people. In the Federalists view, the rights of the states

Read More

Problems With The Articles Of Confederation

742 Words | 3 Pages

The United States ratified the Articles of Confederation in the year 1781. The Articles were the first system of national government of the country. Because it was the first national government, the Articles of Confederation had multiple problems that made it a poor form of government. These problems would lead to the calling of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where a new system of government would be created. The new system of government was provided by the U.S. Constitution.

Read More

Anti Federalism Chapter 1 Analysis

173 Words | 1 Pages

The Anti Federalism refers to the movement that dissenting the creation of a strong United States federal government. And the Anti Federalists believed that the constitution give the power to the federal courts, at the expense of the state and local courts. As well as the Anti Federalists wanted a weak central government. In the other hand The Federalists like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton they wanted a strong government.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More

Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

445 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document