Pros And Cons Of Site-Based Budgeting

870 Words4 Pages

What should be the qualifications of a school board member? Why? Support your decision. What would qualify someone to be a school board member would be able to complete all of the expected responsibilities. Their responsibilities are outlined as employing the superintendents and employing and termination of other personnel, budget adoption, approval of certain school things, and issuance of contracts. Well, look out for the schools and the student's best interests. This is because they are an important part of a school and if they can not do all of the responsibilities well worrying about the school then it could be very bad. Things could go unchecked and change, employees could become corrupt, and things like that. Policies for the school may be useless …show more content…

Site-based budgeting is a type of budgeting approach in which departments or programs at an organization are given a certain amount of money to spend on their own activities, rather than being assigned a set amount of funding from an overarching department or program. It is often used in government and nonprofit organizations, as well as in school districts and other districts.
One pro of site-based budgeting is that it provides individual departments or programs with greater autonomy and control over their budgets. This can help facilitate more efficient decision-making and organizational decision-making processes. In addition, site-based budgeting can help foster collaboration between departments and support efficient resource allocation among different departments within an organization.
However, site-based budgeting has its cons as well. For example, it can result in inefficient use of resources or misallocation of funds if departments do not work together effectively. Additionally, site-based budgeting may not be suitable for larger organizations with multiple departments or programs, since it can be difficult to manage the different budgets