ipl-logo

T. L. O. Vs New Jersey Case Study

784 Words4 Pages

T.L.O. Vs The State of New Jersey Persuasive Essay This is a case about a High School student’s Fourth Amendment rights being violated. The Fourth Amendment states that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Do students have a right to personal privacy when caught breaking school rules?
The case T.L.O. Vs The State of New Jersey is where two High School students were caught smoking cigarettes in the bathroom by a teacher. The teacher took the two girls …show more content…

Smoking is allowed on that campus in the designated areas. Bathrooms are not one of those designated areas. One girl admitted to breaking the no smoking rule. TLO was suspected of breaking the no smoking rule as well. Therefore the principal was justified in searching TLO’s possessions because TLO was suspected of breaking the same no smoking rule. While the principal was searching TLO’s purse not only did he find a pack of cigarettes, he also found marijuana rolling papers and a small amount of marijuana. Then the principal thought that TLO had broken a law. The right of school officials to search students states that for student searches officials must have reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is met when the search is justified at its origin, there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will reveal evidence that the student has violated or is violating the law or school rules. In addition the search is reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the search.
Schools must make the school environment one in which young people can learn and students are safe. School officials need to be enabled to enforce discipline and the upholding of the schools rules. Teachers and principals are acting for the parents of the students. Parents do not need a warrant to search their children. School officials are not the police. They should not have to operate under

Show More
Related
182 Words | 1 Pages

On 03-21-2016, at approximately 9:25 am CSA Stewart observed Jalin D’Angelo Brown entering the search area with a grocery bag with a half of peanut butter and jelly sandwich with an unusual smell. Mr. Stewart asks Jalin Brown what was in the bag and Jalin replied, “It’s just a sandwich.” Upon a closer investigation of the sandwich, CSA Stewart realized that the sandwich was layered with an illegal substance. He took a closer look and noticed that it was “Marijuana called, “Loud,” which was over the interior of the bag. Jalin Brown was turned over to the Dean of Students (Mr. Barnes) and SRO Friday who also confirmed that the sandwich was layered with marijuana.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

On Friday July 29,2016, at approximately 2:30 pm, Security Counselor Patrick Johnson of the inspire Nola Charter School Association Security Department, currently assigned to Edna Karr High School , Located at 3332 Huntlee Dr, in new Orleans Louisiana, 70131,had an occasion to investigate the misplacement of a laptop cart containing multiple laptops. S/C Johnson offers the following report. On Friday July 29,2016 at approximately 12:00pm Mr. Chris Reed a teacher at Edna Karr High school discovered a cart containing multiple laptops next to the trash dumpster. Mr. Reed brought the cart back into the school and reported his findings to head of school Harold Clay.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

In the T.L.O cause the felt the school district search of her purse was a violation of her

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

Peter Crumans 4th amendments were not violated when he was compelled to show his Facebook page. School officials were trying to protect the wellbeing of their students, therefore trying to get to the bottom of what this tip was about and needed to search the suspected student who after a little persistence began to cooperate. Principal Lyons received an anonymous tip that Peter Curman had posted that he would be conducting a few sales of illegal drugs on school property giving him reasonable suspicion to search the student. In the case of New Jersey vs. T.L.O school officials were able to search a student due to reasonable suspicion for violations on school property, therefore giving principal Lyons justification because he not only received

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

1. Title and Citation Vance v. Ball State Univ. 570 U.S. ___ (2013)

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

School officials do not need warrants. They may conduct searches based on reasonableness if it pertains to maintaining the safety and discipline of the school. T.L.O. violating a school rule of smoking in the lavatory gave Assistant Vice Principal suspicion she was in possession of cigarettes. Upon finding cigarettes, the principal discovered rolling paper which is used for marijuana. This gave him reason and justification to search the remaining compartments of the purse.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

if it was held at school of course they would be expelled. After listening to the case i believe that the court made a good

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

Then, she was found guilty of having all of the items listed in the introduction in her purse on school’s premises. Being that she was a minor, her name was not released, therefore being called T.L.O. New Jersey went after T.L.O. after having substantial evidence against her. T.L.O. tried to claim that the Assistant Vice Principal had no reason to search her purse and that him doing that was against her Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution- 4th Amendment , 2015). Being that she was underage, the case was placed in the Juvenile Court of Middlesex County.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

GOSS v. LOPEZ, Supreme Court of the United States, 1975. 419 U.S. 565, 95 S.Ct. 729, 42, L.Ed.2d 725 deals with students that were suspended. The Columbus Ohio Public School System (CPSS) was sued by students. Nine students claimed that they were suspended without being given a hearing before their suspension, or even after their suspensions were over.

Read More
1049 Words | 5 Pages

The teacher did not properly dispose of the student’s records and due to his or her incompetence dogs tore the bags and the files were scattered through the community. To make matters worse, it was scattered through the same communities where some of the students currently reside. So now there is a high possibility that their personal information could be stolen and cause identity theft. The teacher violated two standards and committed ethical violations.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

The main reason that the principal should search lockers is for the security and the safety of the school. If students knew that there lockers would be searched than they would not keep any unwanted items in them. Also, the principal needs to know what students are keeping in there lockers, so that if its bad, that person can’t hurt anyone. If you have nothing in your locker that is bad, then it shouldn’t matter if it is being searched.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

In every school there are set policies and procedures so that all people working within the school are aware and stick to the same rules. Consistency is imperative. All adults working in the school would be : teaching staff, support staff, lunchtime supervisors, kitchen staff, governors, after school staff and temporary staff. There are many policies in schools that children and staff should be aware of.

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

AHD Wearrien told the residents that he notice a smell of marijuana coming from this room. All four residents replied, “they didn’t smoke marijuana” AHD Wearrien informed all four students because of the smell he has to call University Police, so he asked them again, “were you all smoking marijuana?”. Resident Burket admitted that they were smoking marijuana. AHD Wearrien asked if there was any marijuana left in the room, and all four residents replied no. Resident Florez stated to AHD Wearrien “you can’t just give us a warning,” AHD Wearrien responded unfortunately, no, I have document this.

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

As for how much of a mess gum makes, students would have no need to stick their gum under desks and tables if they didn’t have to hide it. If they knew they wouldn’t get in trouble for having it, they would be way more likely to throw it in the trash. Again, if someone did break the rule and put their gum anywhere other than the mouth or the trash, they just wouldn’t be allowed to have gum at school anymore. If students simply didn’t have to hide their gum, they wouldn

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Student attending NorthSide ISD are being treated cruelly; the school utilize their IDs to track them like a pack of cattle. According to the Fourth Amendment, this right is suppose to be protected by the constitution. It is utterly unlawful

Read More

More about T. L. O. Vs New Jersey Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document