ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of TPP

510 Words3 Pages

Finally, we look at popular arguments for and against these two agreements.

The arguments that support the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) include reduced non-tariff barrier rates and increment in jobs for U.S citizens.

In the first argument supporting the TPP, supporters mentioned that TPP would reduce non tariff barrier rates and thus increase trade flow among countries. As compared to the U.S whose non tariff barrier rates for agricultural imports are relatively low at 17%, this is not the case for other countries involved in the TPP negotiations. Japan, South Korea and Australia’s rate for non tariff barrier on agricultural imports are 38.3%, 48.9% and 29.5% respectively. By lowering this rate, it would increase trade flow among the countries involved within the negotiations thus benefitting all parties. …show more content…

Critics have questioned if TPP would result in the same ending as NAFTA which caused a loss of jobs in the US, however, Obama rebutted with the following statement. He argues that “NAFTA was a different agreement, passed 20 years ago. In fact, this agreement fixes some of what was wrong with NAFTA by making labor and environmental provisions actually enforceable.” He mentioned that not only would it not cause a loss in jobs for the US citizens, it would also benefit the large US companies as work standards for its foreign workers are raised.

Overall, the supporters for the TPP agreement believe that TPP would reduce red tape that currently surrounds businesses and improve trading conditions among the countries involved.

Next, we move on to discuss on the two arguments that critics pose against the idea of the TPP agreement. The arguments include the restriction of affordable medicines and also the lack of transparency concerning the

Show More
Related
676 Words | 3 Pages

Issue What is the nature of the North American Free Agreement (NAFTA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreements? What are the advantages and disadvantages of NAFTA and TPP Canada and Saskatchewan? Background NAFTA is a trade agreement signed by Canada, Mexico and the United states in 1994. NAFTA replaced the 1987 Canada-USA Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA has rules that ensure the goods traded are from qualified regions.

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

What a Lovely Trade War,” Krugman explains how trade policy is far more complicated than it seems. Krugman posits that Trump’s protectionist agenda is not a viable solution and that trade, as intended, benefits both the United States and its partners. I argue

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

The flaw in this argument is NAFTA did not take away jobs, the economy is constantly changing, most jobs were lost in the U.S due to structural unemployment. Specific jobs were replaced by technology, especially automotive jobs. The workers did not meet the requirements and thus were replaced with new technology that was proven to be more efficient. Overall, more jobs have been added in after NAFTA was put in place. The manufacturing business is a great example of this, “manufacturing in the U.S. grew by 250,000 jobs after NAFTA”(Marketplace).

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement.” NAFTA has constructed more jobs in different sectors from automotive to energy and agriculture. Jobs are also established in areas of

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Both articles discuss what purpose The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) should serve. However, the authors have different views regarding NAFTA. I am analyzing the second article because I appreciate the way the author portrays NAFTA. The author, Mark Milke, focuses on the benefits of the free trade agreement by using normative, positive, and analytical statements. These statements help him further the case he is making in his article.

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

That’s why, in Budget 2014, the federal government announced the creation of a new Internal Trade Barriers Index. The Index will set a baseline for understanding internal trade barriers and how the impacts increase or decrease over time. It will also give policy makers good information to guide decisions on priority areas for action. ∗ 2. What do you think Canada can do to improve its global trade?

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

The North American Free Trade Agreement has provided many benefits for North America. Because of NAFTA, trade, jobs, and economic growth have greatly increased between Mexico, the United States, and Canada. Along with these advantages many drawbacks can be found. One of the major issues concerning NAFTA is the agricultural competition between the United States and Mexico. NAFTA needs to address the conflicts that Mexican farmers are facing because a large portion of Mexican farmers are losing their jobs, making sacrifices, and stressing their lands causing environmental problems.

Read More
1632 Words | 7 Pages

However, this device was not effective due to the fallacies. During his State of the Union President Trump continued to trash the NAFTA trade deal when boasting on the fact he was able to replace it with a new trade deal USMCA. However, “The USMCA is a modest reworking of NAFTA launched in 1994, with about 85 to 90 percent the same” (Kessler et al., 2020). Considering the similarities, this fact proves this rhetorical device to be ineffective. Once again, reporter Megan Cassella said “The independent U.S. International Trade Commission found the pact would create 176,000 jobs across all sectors and raise U.S. GDP by 0.35 percent by the sixth year after it enters into force.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

The NAFTA has increased illegal immigration in the United States, “With the reduction of tariffs, NAFTA also allowed

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

The article also talks about the different perspectives of the countries involved in this deal and how they vary. Stronger economic countries like Germany were more keen to sign the deal, while smaller countries like Austria and Belgium had other ideas about it. These smaller countries believe that they require more domestic production in order to further grow their economy. Although protectionism is usually a bad thing for the consumer, it can have its economic benefits. Temporary protectionism can allow for a country to increase its domestic production and grow to the levels of its competitors.

Read More
1709 Words | 7 Pages

The House of Representatives, according to Jonathan Weisman’s New York Times article, “House Rejects Trade Measure,” canceled Obama’s push to expand trade negotiated power and his chance to secure an accord spanning across the Pacific Ocean. Surprisingly, the push did not come from the Republicans, but from the Democrats, Obama’s home party. The House Democrats voted to end assistance to workers displaced by global trade, a program the Democrats wanted to keep running for the four years of Obama’s second term as President of the US. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House minority leader, comments, “We want a better deal for America’s workers.” The Democrats likely thwarted Obama’s goals of more trade because Obama wanted to double the trade with every ally of the US on the Pacific coast.

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

These tariff acts have lead America to where it standings today with the foreign trade agreement and have even helped our country shape stronger and more reliable relationships and alliances with other countries. For example, as of November 5th 2015, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is made up of the twelve countries that include; Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, United States, and Vietnam, has come to a conclusion and contracted an agreement that is to be followed by each of the countries. This agreement as President Barack Obama states, “is a agreement that reflects America’s values and gives our workers the fair shot at success they deserve.” In summary, this partnership makes things

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Another FTA is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Amongst others Australia, Chile, Malaysia, Peru, New Zealand, Singapore and Vietnam are in negotiations of the TPP. Due to Chile’s large number of FTA’s their average tariff rate is less than 1% and most imports enter duty-free, besides more than 90% of their trade is conducted on a preferential basis because of the FTA’s 
(Marketline

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

There are three types of conflict present in the lives of all people. Struggles are necessary in real and fictional narratives to advance the storyline and to help one reach their goals. These obstacles are particularly abundant in action stories. A classic adventure story, Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” demonstrates the aforementioned three types of conflicts, man versus nature, man versus man, and man versus self. Conflict between man and nature is exhibited in the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”.

Read More
2919 Words | 12 Pages

Protectionism is coming to us from all directions, and numerous nations are using both direct and indirect barriers to trade, as when they require to do so. What economists mostly talk about are the threats of protectionism, rather than its benefits and how protectionism isn’t a long term solution. By now we have understood that protectionism, whether we like it or not, is used in certain economic situation by every other country, but it shouldn’t be seen as a permanent solution. Protectionism is a superficially convincing concept, because we can immediately point out the number of jobs saved, lesser no of imports etc. but it slightly more difficult to see the benefits of free trade in numbers, but one country’s protectionist policies will not just hurt their trading countries exports.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of TPP

Related Topics

Open Document