ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The American Jury System

1024 Words5 Pages

Name: Roger Gradler Hour: 5 Date: 12/20/17
“Is the American Jury System Still a Good Idea?”
Is the American Jury System Still a good idea? That is a long and complicated questions that could take years to answer. Many people say that it is good because it give the people the right to choose and the right to self government. Another reason I don’t like a jury is because jury’s send more people to jail then a bench jury which makes it so the people that did the crime do the time. There are people also that are against having a jury because the are influenced by media and the isn’t always right. They also say that the people on the jury don’t focus and only think about things they want to not the case that they are listening to. The position …show more content…

I believe that the jury system in the United States of America should be eliminated because it harder to get people that are un-basis, people don’t pay attention in court, and a bench judge is the best option for the people.
The american jury system is not as good as it once was in the early years. People then didn’t have the problems with the media turning people's minds. This is because back then it took months for one piece of news to get to the people in that state and the case would be over by then. In “Document D” this is conveyed really well. In “Document D it says “Do you mean to tell me that in Florida you can kill your child, toss her on the side of the road and go free?” What she said to the news was a basis opinion. That the media portrayed to her. This is because she wasn’t involved in the case at all, and the only place she was able to get the …show more content…

This is because they all think of what is shown on tv as what really happens in court, but this isn’t true. So when they get there( to the courthouse) and they see that it is boring and they tune out and start to think about what they want, not the case. This action is represented in “Document E” it shows people on the jury and only 6 of them are thinking a about the case. One of the people on the jury is thinking about music which is means they are useless to the case and will not help in decided weather this person goes to jail or gets to see their family again. This is very immature because this is your job as a citizen to do this one small task. If this was one of their real jobs most of them would be fired after day one because they don’t pay attention. One of the other jurors is thinking about money. This is a person's life and all they can think about is how much they are getting paid to be here,that is ridiculous. This is a problem that needs to be solved. The solution to this problem in my opinion is to use the jury system less than before. This means that the bench trail will have to be used more. In “Document E” source 2 says “We, the Jury, find the defendant to be as guilty as he looks.” This means that the jury in this case found the defendant guilty because he looked guilty, not because the defendant was guilty. The actions by the jury will cause a man to go to jail because he looks like he did

Show More
Related
515 Words | 3 Pages

The Founding Fathers wanted the people of the United States to be in a democracy or self-government and established the jury system into the constitution. It is expensive and is a long process to start a jury trial. Also, jurors are not as professional as judges and can not determine a fair verdict. The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect might also affect the verdict of the jury. The American jury system should not be used because of it not being cost-effective, the lack of experience of the jury, which leads to justice not being served, and the CSI effect impacting the

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

While this idea may seem logical, some people still argue that the court system should be based on facts and not emotion. However, like stated before, a jury works best if it takes into consideration the actual human side of the case, just like how juries ruled against slave laws in the 1800s. Summary As the case defending jury nullification draws to an end, it is evident that this legal practice is truly benefiting the American court system: Not only does jury nullification prevent unjust laws being enforced, but it also provides more reasonable punishments to criminals and controls the corruption happening in the courtroom.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

America gives any defendant a trial by judge, unless the judge allows a trial by jury. There are certain cases that need a better balance between a guilty verdict and the defendant’s freedom. Murder trials often receive 12 jurors to decide the defendant’s fate, while civil cases often have a judge making the verdict. The issue lies in citizens because they are unaware of the seriousness that presides in choosing another human’s future. Judges should be the only decision makers to choose a verdict which gives a defendant a fair trial in how they will use fact over feeling, they will be focused on deciding the verdict, and they are aware of the moral issues that may come out in a case.

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

Like the Electoral College, several of the plans made by the Founding Fathers have lost some of their practicality. What worked in the past does not always work in the future, and this is the case for the jury system. The sole reason it was created was to ensure that each citizen was guaranteed a fair trial, which was a main concern due to Britain’s monarchy. In modern times, however, the judicial branch of the United States could easily give every citizen a fair trial with only a judge presiding over the case. It is clear that bench trials are superior to trials by jury because the citizens on juries are unqualified or biased, its benefits do not outweigh its burdens, and its claim to encourage civic duty is false.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

Unfortunately, it is this very trial by jury that King George III abolished in the Colonies. This infuriated the colonists, and was one the main grievances that were addressed in the Declaration of Independence. The Founding Fathers had first hand experience of what tyranny could occur without a right to a jury of peers, and protected all Americans by creating the Seventh

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The American Jury System offers the United States citizens an opportunity to be proven guilty or innocent when a crime has been committed. The twelve person jury system was established in England hundreds of years ago. Originally this system was made up of twelve men and this was huge because they had the power to go against what the judge wanted in court. There are many vital points as to why our American jury system is successful; jury trials by the numbers, ownership by jury members towards the accused, how reliable or unreliable evidence is viewed by jurors, gender balance and the detailed screening process in which jurors are selected.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

Some may argue that this is an old age idea that doesn’t work with today’s society. However, the jury system is still very effective today. As soon as you receive your driver’s license you are in the drawing to be on a jury. There is a pool of people selected to come participate on the jury, but slowly they are cut down

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Is the American Jury System still a Good Idea? In the American Judicial System today, there is a choice between trial by jury or bench trial. Trial by jury is used today by selecting jurors from pools of people who are eligible, adult American citizens. Trial by jury is often controversial because of how the jurors are not professionals whereas in a bench trial, a judge is highly educated in law (Doc B).

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most important benefits, however, is the reduced risk of a compromise verdict. The overall benefit of majority verdicts suit the circumstances for all but the commonwealth laws. (Knox 2002) “When a lone ratbag juror can abort a trial, the time-honoured idea of the unanimous verdict starts to look decidedly unsound.” In the book ‘Secrets of the Jury Room’ Knox broadcasts the ideals of jurors acting selflessly and complains about rogue jurors messing up a trial.

Read More
1194 Words | 5 Pages

For this reason, safeguarding the civil jury system for future generations holds great importance to anyone who wishes to give a better future to the next generation. Correspondingly, “civil juries express the conscience of the community, injecting shared values into their decisions about society’s tolerance for certain types of behavior. In this way, civil juries perform a norm-setting or signaling function that deters potential wrongdoers from dangerous conduct… In addition, the civil jury system educates the public about civic virtues, democratic values and the law itself” (IMPACT 1). Basically, the right of trial by jury must be sustained because it is the right of the people and in the end, it involves more people in their civic duties and helps regulate the courts and

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Is the trial by jury the best system for those accused of a crime? A jury is a group of normal citizens of the United States asked to serve as a juror for several weeks. Most crimes committed around the world are faced with a trial by jury, to decide the faults and innocence of a crime. Both text 2- "A Defense of the Jury System" by Thomas M. Ross and Text 3- "What I learned serving on Grand Jury Duty" by Barbara Wagner relate to the topic of a trial by jury.

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

As Americans, we are given many freedoms through the Constitution. These freedoms are what set our country apart from others and what attract people to our nation. One of these important freedoms is the right of a citizen to be tried in court in front of a non-biased jury. A jury is a compilation of 12 people from all walks of life who are called to come together to give a person a fair trial. Without the institution of the jury, our judicial system could not be completely fair.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

The last danger to the justice system is jurors on the jury duty have no common sense to figure out the truth behind cases. One example is in the play “Twelve Angry Men” juror 10 says about juror 8 “ He’s a common ignorant slob. He don’t even speak good English” (Rose 326)! Then juror 11 corrects juror 10 saying “He doesn’t even speak good English” (Rose 326). Also anyone that is a United States citizen and of the age of 18 is allowed to be called to be on jury duty.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

No. 8: I think that the jury system we have today has its own advantages and disadvantages. For example, a jury that consists of jurors who are biased could be manipulated by ‘outsiders’ through bribery or some jurors, as we have discussed before, might have some personal prejudices/beliefs that may affect their decision making. But there are some advantages as well because the decision that is made by the jury is thought out very carefully by a group of people. Interviewer: [gathers all his papers]

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The American Jury System

Related Topics

Open Document