Have you ever wondered about the Dakota access pipeline and thought is it good or bad. The Dakota access pipeline is an “Oil pipeline that would run diagonally across Iowa, through 18 counties, from northwest Iowa to southeast Iowa” (Tyler Durden, 2016). Even though I do not support the pipeline, because of damaging reasons, it does help our economy become more desirable. First I do not support this pipeline considering it does not help our environment.
The Interstate Highway Act of 1956(National and Defense Highways Act) was one of the largest public efforts that had constructed 41,000 miles of the system over a 10 year period. It was a work that had greatly revolutionized the way the world progresses while also enriching the quality of life for almost every American citizen. This event was important enough to remain in the textbook because socially it made traveling more efficient while also allowing citizens to travel to many more places inexpensively,economically because goods were able to be transported more productively which ultimately allowed many companies to lower transportation/production costs and enhance productivity/profits,higher gas prices due to increased production of cars,and
Dakota Access Pipeline “What is this you call property? It cannot be the earth, for the land is our mother… how can one man say it belongs only to him?” (Massasoit 1). Over the past few months, a land related disagreement has emerged between an American Indian tribe called the Standing Rock Sioux and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The dispute revolves around the creation of a 1,172-mile pipeline which will carry crude oil from Sioux territory in North Dakota to Illinois (Energy Transfer 1).
The Dakota Access Pipeline should not be built under the Missouri river because if the pipeline is built more water will become contaminated. In a CNN article about the pipeline, it states “The Dakota Access pipeline would fuel climate change, cause untold damage to the environment, and significantly disturb sacred lands and the way of life for Native Americans in the upper Midwest,”(CNN). The Dakota Access Pipeline is one of the most controversial pipelines ever made and said that this pipeline can hurt multiple things at once. There is a bunch of pros and cons to this pipeline but to ignore all those pros and let's talk about the cons, CNN states that others said there might be a possible breach of the pipeline in the future. The pipeline
The Dakota Access Pipeline has been a very controversial subject, it makes you truly think what would be best for most people in the situation. Like every story, there are two sides, and what one finds right or wrong is up to them. Here is exactly what the Dakota Access Pipeline is, and the pros, and cons. The Dakota Pipeline is a giant project that will run an oil pipe from North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois that's around 1,000 miles of 30-inch pipes.
I, Sitting Bull, am very disappointed in the actions taken by the United States Government. In the 19th Century, my people and I were endlessly treated terribly and attacked by the U.S. Government. We had to defend ourselves when the colonists started to move out west almost 150 years ago, and we are still facing the same problems today. The Dakota Access Pipeline will poorly affect my people, the Sioux.
The Dakota Access Pipeline, has sparked quite the controversy. The oil pipeline would stretch over four states, and has many positive and negative possible effects. Many can debate whether or not this pipeline is ethically correct, but no one can debate the few positive economic effects on the nation. One such effect, “1,500 jobs total per year in Iowa for the course of construction.” (Sammon)
Since its construction in 1977, the Trans Alaska Pipeline has transported almost 17 billion barrels of oil, and currently transports about 527,323 barrels a day. It celebrated its 40th Anniversary last year, and, even after all this time, is still facing controversy. The pipeline is highly debated as economically inclined citizens of Alaska are clashing with more environmental types. The Trans Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, signed by President Nixon in 1973, protected the pipeline by banning all legal challenges against the construction of the pipeline. However, this law did not stop the critics of the pipeline from speaking out.
To begin, the Dakota access pipeline should be completed because it will help the economy immensely and in so many different ways. One way it helps the economy is by providing lots of jobs. 8,000 to 12,000 new jobs to be exact. Not only that, but lots more money will be given to companies that supply materials such as steel pipes. Both of these reasons will allow for more money to be circulated throughout the economy, therefore producing in a stronger economy.
After the president submits the budget request and lawmakers have thoroughly reviewed it, the House Committee on the Budget and the Senate Committee on the Budget each writes a budget resolution A budget resolution is not a binding document, but is more like a blueprint. It provides a framework for Congress for making budget decisions about spending and taxes. It sets overall annual spending limits for federal agencies, but does not set specific spending amounts for particular programs. After the two chambers pass their budget resolutions, a joint conference is formed to iron out differences between the two and a reconciled version is then voted on by each chamber.
Three problems stated in "Texas Politics", is one, build more roads, make cars cleaner and safer, create alternatives to transportation by auto mobile, and persuade people to use them. The pros for building more roads or at least expanding current ones would be better flow of traffic to different locations. The cons for this means waiting out construction but also that means tax dollars spent on the road rather than to something else that might need the attention instead. Pros to making cars cleaner and safer, it would make less pollution for the atmosphere and also cut down on the use of natural resources. The cons would be higher price tag on the vehicles as we have already seen with the current smart cars.
When a trip is done faster than expected, bonuses and bigger pay can be given to a trucker (Paulden). Trucking firms can benefit highly from these separate roads. Companies could quadruple their profit with gaining other customers. Having less contact with smaller vehicles causes less accidents and less trucks having to be repaired, which would be a major benefit to the trucking firms (Forkenbrock,
For example, to reduce the cost of collecting tolls, the access points had to be spaced far apart and this did not allow the use of the road for local traffic. If trucks were prohibited on the toll roads, the state would have to provide public free roads for trucks. Yet, the federal authorities were not able to influence the toll authorities with their policies because the toll road authorities had not received any federal funds. On the other hand, the successful turnpikes which were profitable invested their revenues to support the weaker sections. The 100-mile extension of the Pennsylvania Turnpike east to the Delaware River, a new toll expressway from Greenwich to Killingly in Connecticut, and a northern extension of the Maine Turnpike to Augusta are evidence of the success of the profitable turnpikes (FHWA,
1. Prominently known as the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act of 1956, the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 secured an interstate expressway framework in the United States. The development behind the development of a cross-country superhighway began in the 1930s when President Franklin D. Roosevelt communicated enthusiasm for the development of a system of toll superhighways that would give more employments to individuals needing work amid the Great Depression. The subsequent enactment was the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1938, which coordinated the head of the Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) to study the achievability of a six-course toll system. Anyway, with America nearly joining the war in Europe, the time for an enormous roadway project
Yes both sides have good reasons, yes one side may be better than the other. In the article “Maybe Bus Rides Should Be Free” is showing how much time gets wasted with bus rides and how many people get fined for not having a ticket. In these cities when people need bus rides there are thousands of people trying to get on a bus ride without a ticket. Most of the time it works
