ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

502 Words3 Pages

Should murderers, and other brutal criminals, be executed rather than spend life in jail?
What makes a person deserve the death penalty? Execution is a process of intentionally killing an individual who is found guilty of committing a brutal crime. For many people, sentencing a criminal to death row is a questionable subject. In my opinion, there is no way to justify execution. One reason being, I recognize that criminals can learn from their mistakes. Furthermore, I also feel that taking away a murderer’s life, makes you a murderer yourself. Lastly, I feel that instead of being executed, criminals must deal with the consequence of being a prisoner. Overall, the three listed reasons are why I don’t feel a criminal should be executed rather than spend life in prison. …show more content…

The purpose of supporting prisoners is to allow them to better their lives. Time is always required for anyone to learn from their mistakes. Keeping all that in mind, executing a criminal doesn’t allow them to reflect on the significance of the offense they have committed. Overall, it is important to remember that people must have a second chance in life to learn from their past experiences.
The main reason why laws are established is to serve and protect all citizens. Regarding murder, laws are enforced to inform people that killing others is wrongful and prohibited. Through my own experience, I feel that if a higher authority sets a rule, it is their obligation to be a role model and commit to the rule themselves. With that in mind, I feel that executioners go against the constitution when executing a criminal. Under those circumstances, I don’t agree with a person having the authority to take away someone’s

Show More
Related
677 Words | 3 Pages

While there are far more subjects to discuss regarding to this issue, I feel it necessary to state that I believe the death penalty should exist in a perfect society. I believe that certain crimes and certain situations warrant the punishment of death. However, the our society is not perfect. The justice system has failed to fairly use this punishment in far too many instances, and concludes that they cannot justly wield this

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Countless people have committed murders, all around the world. Some are attempts, and some lead to actual deaths. Most gain time in jail, but some receive the death penalty. Why? By reason of innocents dead by the hands of another.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

In actuality, the death penalty is not ethical, as there are more practical ways in dealing with dangerous criminals; the sentencing of life without parole. Meanwhile, as the substantial topic on the death penalty persists, supporters for the death penalty that life without parole is unfair; if they denied a person a right to live, why should they get to live? While that may be true, the thought of

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Support for capital punishment requires valuing retribution over rehabilitation. Those who favor capital punishment value highly the closure it provides to the families of the victims, and they believe that it deters would be murderers from killing. Retribution, closure and deterrence are the main reasons in favor of the death penalty. Opponents of capital punishment generally believe that it is hypocritical and immoral for the state

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Being in jail is better than a death sentence in many ways; they get good meals, they have clothes or someone could escape. They have everything that any normal person would have besides independence and sometimes connections to the outside world. The inmates

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

I believe murders and other “brutal criminals” should not be executed instead of spending life in jail. From the flaws in the justice system, success rates of rehabilitation and the lack of mental illness being represented is a major issue that needs to be addressed. The Canadian Justice System has its challenges, but its flaws outshine the good it has done. I'm personally aware of a situation where an individual was convicted for 2nd degree murder. Only after 3 years were they able to get their murder charge reduced to an accessory, which was more appropriate when reviewing the case.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriage of justice, death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family, it deters crime, and you know the criminal will never hurt anyone again. Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice, Death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family. Family and friends of the victims should never have to worry about parole or a slight chance of that same criminal escaping. Knowing that that one person

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, the death sentence is only applied to those who commit murder, however, in the past, it has also been used for rape and armed robbery. Arguing in favor it can seem justifiable to take the life of a person who unjustifiably took the life of someone else. And with murder being the only way to be sentenced to the death penalty it seems fitting. Along with that, it provides deterrence from committing murder for possibly many people. The deterrence that execution provides is a debated topic nested into another controversial topic.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Criminals are shielded from cruel and unusual punishments. Finding the better option for good is sometimes the only answer. More so, execution is a crueler punishment than a life sentence without the possibility of parole. The process of entrusting a jury and judge with the power to decide someone's fate and put an end to their life will always be inhumane and seen as a cruel punishment. Although the Supreme Court has ruled capital punishment constitutional, it is difficult to determine if someone really deserves to die rather than just spending life locked away with no possibility of release.

Read More
2019 Words | 9 Pages

inappropriate to try to reform and rehabilitate them to give them the change to let out to the society again because their crimes are so harsh and condemned by the public and the society so that the court decided that the authorities does not have the positive effect to the society by keeping the criminal in the prison, providing them the services with people’s taxes. Many abolitionists claim that retribution is nothing but revenge; it does not contain any good reason but to avenge. They claim that such retribution does not do any good to the victim or to the criminal. Many abolitionists does argue that capital punishment should be replaced with a life without parole, as such sentence would have exactly same effect to the criminal and the society, nonetheless more ethical and humane. Some extreme supporters for capital punishment claim that they would not like their taxes being used to feed and secure a criminal who ‘deserve to be executed’.

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

The Death Penalty The argument for criminals to receive the death penalty, also known as Capital Punishment, has been an on-going debate for years. This issue has been very hasty in the United States because people have their own opinion on this topic. A majority of people believes that the death penalty should be passed as a law in the states, but others think that criminals should just have life in prison. If a criminal was to commit a murder(s), the person should receive the same treatment as a person they killed, death.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

There are five different ways a person can be executed, there is lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging (“Methods of Execution”). The death penalty can be very controversial, some of the pro death penalty people believe that the penalty works because it’s following Hammurabi’s code, which is of an eye for an eye. So, if someone murdered another person that person’s life should be taken in return. But, the people who are against the death penalty say that the penalty is inhumane and the people in jail are suffering more than the people on death row. I strongly believe that the death penalty should be allowed, because it provides extraordinary closure for the victim’s family, it costs less than to

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

Killing the Death Penalty Is murder ever justified? In terms of safety, there are times when the well-being of one person is put on the line in order to save others. When we look at controversial issues such as the death penalty, we want to debate with one another stating our opinion on the matter.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document