ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Lethal Autonomous Weapons System

1303 Words6 Pages

The third Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) annual meeting of informal group of experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons System (LAWS) took place from April 11-15, 2016. A series of dialogues was held with regards to the challenges of international law, and ethical dilemmas of the deployment of LAWS, hopefully leading to a proper consensual recommendation to the fifth Review Conference on 16 December. In actuality, it’s not the first debate on the deployment of LAWS.
In 2002, Human Rights Watch released a report, “Losing Humanity: The Case against Killer Robots,” denying the legality of LAWS and advocating the all-out ban on the future development of LAWS. Two days later, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) published the Directive 3000.09, suggesting …show more content…

However, these weapons are not what we are talking about here. The autonomous weapons system (AWS) is, as the U.S. DoD defines, a weapon system that, once activated, is intended to select and engage targets on its own. Unlike the former automated weapons systems which mostly are remotely interfered by human operators “in the loop” (human controlled) or “on the loop” (human supervised), AWS doesn’t rely on any human intervention to lauch attacks. Although this kind of high-tech doesn’t exist in any practicable form at this point, technological innovations in weaponry development must render it possible in …show more content…

Accoring to the Article 51 and 57, Protocol I, the attack shall not be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. Not only is LAWS difficult to avoid disproportionate killings, but also the principle of military necessity further add the legal complexity. Military necessity, suggested in the IHL, justifies those measures not forbidden by international law, which may trigger adverse repercussions toward the civilians and properties. It remains legal to make acceptable collateral damage under the circumstances of military necessity. Nevertheless, according to Article 35(2), Protocol I, it’s prohibited to employ weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering. The use of lethal force proves lawful, but only the means and methods of warfare are necessary to accomplish the military advantage. Plus, Article 41(2) protects a person who “expresses an intention to surrender,” or “has been rendered unconscious or otherwise incapacitated by wounds or sickness.” An International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) report explains, “if a combatant can be put out of action by taking him prison, he should not be injured; if he can be put out of action by injury, he should not be killed.” In addition, NATO’s Policy on Non-Lethal

Show More
Related
4783 Words | 20 Pages

This begins in the planning phase and carries through to the execution. The development of the CONOPs is specifically when the Jus Ad Bellum ends and the Jus En Bello begins. It is also where the first effects of the uncertain authority and cause of the Vietnam War were felt. In a March 24th 1965 Memo by Assistant Secretary of Defense McNaughton the objectives of Operation Rolling Thunder were ; 1.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

The U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA) was founded in 1968 when the U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMC) reorganized and separated its Ballistic Research Laboratory’s Weapons System Laboratory into two units: : the Aberdeen Research and Development Center (now the Army Research Laboratory) and AMSAA. Born out of AMC’s requirement for a systems analysis capability, AMSAA has informed and impacted Army decisions through independent operations research analysis for a half century. AMSAA’s impact over the past 50 years exceeds expectations for a workforce of its size. AMSAA has fluctuated between 250 to 500 employees over the last 50 years, with a current strength of ~300 analysts and engineers. AMSAA’s first mission statement

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

This is seen as Unnecessary killing or destruction which is unlawful. Document 4 says in Article one that you Must make every effort to obtain peace, and once peace is achieved, do not break or breach it. Article two says that a country should Settle disputes so that peace, security, or justice are not endangered. This must stay loyal to the purpose of the United Nations. This goes against what the U.S did as they did not follow these steps of peace which would of maybe helped the war effort and cause less casualties overall.

Read More
1459 Words | 6 Pages

In correlation, if automatic weapons were a problem in WWI, it was bound to get worse, considering that each year, more technology is being incorporated into battle. For instance an article published by the Center for a New American Society informed readers that “more than 30 nations already have or are developing armed drones” (Ewers). The article then continues to explain that autonomous weapons are used to help identify targets easier. This, however, increases soldier’s the ability to kill an enemy without seeing them or taking emotional responsibility for it. With more automatic weapons,

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

The year begins, mass killings continue, and also the u. s. government has nevertheless to declare what's happening in Asian nation and Syria “genocide.” By now, the proof is overwhelming: ISIS is consistently eradicating Yazidis, Christians, sect Muslims and alternative ethnic and non secular minorities in territories controlled by the FTO. What’s at stake is quite an issue of semantics: A declaration of killing has important legal and ethical implications that might need the u. s. – and likeminded countries – to try to to no matter it takes to rescue the refugees and finish the killing.

Read More
1742 Words | 7 Pages

Rules: With regard to international armed conflicts, the four Geneva Conventions (GC I to IV) and Additional Protocol I and II contain various provisions specifically dealing with both of Prisoners of War, Civilians protection to prevent any kind of violations that may happen toward them. The Forth Geneva convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War has set rules governing the issue of civilians who found themselves under enemy’s possession. Article 5 of the 4th GC has identified who are protected persons with putting conditions to be considered as protected with the privileges of having the statue of protected persons at article 27 of the same convention. Third Geneva Convention in particular has recognized group of rights with regarded to POWs such as the right to be humanely treated at article 13, correspondence at article 71, the right to gain a sufficient food in quantity and quality at article 26 and the right to not be subjected to torture and question at article 17 where every prisoner of war “when questioned on the subject, is bound to give only his surname, first names and rank, date of birth, and army, regimental, personal or serial number, or failing this, equivalent information” Moreover, the use of weapons and means that have indiscriminate effects such as poisonous gas and bombs which also would aggravate the suffering recognized as prohibited to use due to the amount of damage it causes upon civilians as well as the environment

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

Why is an assault weapon so unsafe to the public? The guns are made perilous in the minds of individuals, for it's the characters who control the guns. The nation's security will be protected if the sales harmful weapons were organized. There have been cases where people were in possession of the weapons were a threat to others. The dangers of the weapons will flourish if the obstacles aren't dealt with.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

We are all governed by our conscience, a persons conscience is what shapes our decisions about what is right and what is wrong. But what happens when our conscience disagree’s with the law of the country we live in? Today millions of civilian’s all over the world are imprisoned because their conscience cannot reconcile the killing of another human-being as as acceptable. These civilians are known as conscientious objectors. This report brings the past and the present together to bring light to the darkness conscientious objectors face over the world.

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

These offensives aim to kill al-Qaeda and Taliban affiliates. The United States defends this practice by pointing at the Pakistani government's lack of control in the area, and how this inability to manage territory puts the United States at risk. The American process to assess targets involves the filing of legal briefs before an attack is approved, and briefs backed up with little intelligence are rejected. Despite this process, at least 423 civilians have been killed by these strikes. In response, the Peshawar High Court has ruled that CIA drone strikes in Pakistan are illegal.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Our nation’s understanding is that human judgment and clemency can’t ever be replaced with artificial intelligence. The Democratic Republic of Congo does not possess such like weapons and assuredly won’t develop fully autonomous weapons in the future. The nation of DRC agrees with the notion of using feasible and measured set of guidelines to

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

Extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction can in many circumstances be a useful and legitimate response to transnational crime. Criminal activity is not always confined to territorial boarders, and so the law may seek to follow the crime to prevent an offender from enjoying impunity. A number of states have included in their criminal legislature provisions allowing for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes, even when such crime is committed outside their national territory and whether or not the perpetrators or the victims are nationals of the state concerned”. The importance of extraterritorial jurisdiction was also seen in the Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949 – Reparations for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. Personnel of the UN were targeted in Palestine which culminated in the assassination of

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

The recent technological developments and military operational demands are leading to increasing levels of autonomous weapons systems Autonomous weapons have been used in military operations. There are three categories of autonomous weapons: in the loop, on the loop, or off the loop. We mainly use in the loop and on the loop because they both need humans to operate the machines. However, off the loop is fully autonomous weapons. A fully autonomous weapon is one that can independently detect and attack targets without the need for humans.

Read More
1854 Words | 8 Pages

The problems of implementation of the Fourth Geneva Convention are mostly pragmatic ones such as the trouble of battling in populated zones and controlling the conduct of the military personnel performing on the battleground. Yet, the most serious issue is political will. if a nation needs to uphold the Geneva Conventions, it can make impressive efforts to act inside the spirit of them. If a national government has inadequate appreciation for the mankind they attempt to support, and if not, it considers them to be a burden.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Lethal Autonomous Weapons System

Related Topics

Open Document