ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Regulation Of Autonomous Weapons

570 Words3 Pages

Autonomous weapons can be defined as “a weapon system that, once activated, can select and engage targets without further intervention by a human operator. This includes human-supervised autonomous weapon systems that are designed to allow human operators to override operation of the weapon system, but can select and engage targets without further human input after activation.” These weapons can be used in domains such as land, air, water, space and even cyber. The introduction of such weapons has triggered new trials in international codes of law, ethics, and human rights. The hazardous risk posed by fully autonomous weapons is that, it doesn’t need any human control to obliterate its threats and because of this, a high percentage of the international community perceives it as immoral and unethical. Our nation’s understanding is that human judgment and clemency can’t ever be replaced with artificial intelligence. The Democratic Republic of Congo does not possess such like weapons and assuredly won’t develop fully autonomous weapons in the future. The nation of DRC agrees with the notion of using feasible and measured set of guidelines to …show more content…

We believe that testing and certification of autonomous weapons should be handled in a way that will create enough transparency, and some level of confidence, to reach international agreements and to avoid scenarios of mutual destruction. We are proud to state that a Congolese scientist is working with the International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomous Weapons (iPRAW) which is an independent group of specialists who work under the guidance of The United Nations Convention of Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) to provide an unbiased source of information and to the Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) within the charter of the United Nations Convention of Certain Conventional

Show More
Related
1869 Words | 8 Pages

War is hell, to say the least. When one country finds itself the victim of another’s attacks, there is a certain unanimity that accompanies retaliation; a patriotic refusal to back down by doing whatever it takes to ensure victory. Despite opposition from some, weapons such as guns and traditional bombs are expected in battles. Without disregarding the lives lost in war, nobody bats an eye at a bullet. The trouble comes when a weapon with the eventual power to destroy all human life is introduced; a weapon that can so easily be used haphazardly with a big picture blindness disguised as an ultimatum.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Jonathan Zittrain opens his essay with the very case his argument is centered around; A battle resulting in the loss of weaponry, to those who are seeking to use it against us. His use of a real event is an effective way to keep the reader's attention in a rather complex issue. The reality and severity he presents is the key to how persuasive his case is throughout the essay. Through this essay, Zittrain makes a convincing statement, that we should consider implementing kill switches in military weaponry. He supports this position through, Addressing and understanding concerns with his proposed use of kill switches, his suggestion of multiple options regarding its implementation, the professional opinions of others, along with compelling appeals

Read More
1459 Words | 6 Pages

In correlation, if automatic weapons were a problem in WWI, it was bound to get worse, considering that each year, more technology is being incorporated into battle. For instance an article published by the Center for a New American Society informed readers that “more than 30 nations already have or are developing armed drones” (Ewers). The article then continues to explain that autonomous weapons are used to help identify targets easier. This, however, increases soldier’s the ability to kill an enemy without seeing them or taking emotional responsibility for it. With more automatic weapons,

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

Around 80 million americans own about 223 million guns. Therefore Assault Rifles should not be banned from american citizens. Banning assault rifles would interfere with the second amendment of the United States of America. Within the second amendment, it states citizens have the “Right to bear arms.” “It is a constitutional right to bear arms.”

Read More
1398 Words | 6 Pages

For instance, a missile defense system is only as effective as its ability to detect foreign threats. The introduction of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and deep fakes, has further complicated this challenge, introducing new dimensions to the threat of WMD. In this evolving landscape, a malicious actor may not need to possess actual nuclear weapons – they might only need to convince a nation that they are under attack from someone who legitimately possesses them. Fortunately, the annual strategies each thoroughly discuss

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

This report does not aim to question the morality of assassinations; rather, given that the decision to assassinate an individual has been made, it analyzes the ethical arguments concerning The United State’s use of a drone strike as a means of assassination rather than spending Special Forces. Recently, the US military has increased its use of airstrikes by unmanned aerial vehicles (UVAs) as a means of assassination. This pivot in foreign policy has popularized the ethical debate concerning the effectiveness of ‘drone strikes’ as a means of killing America’s enemies. The use of drone strikes provides the US with the safest, cheapest, and least politically destabilizing method of assassination, though, increased transparency concerning the

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

This type of gun should remain for military use only and not be an easy access to the

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Will banning of assault weapons reduce crime? The production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens should be banned in the U.S. According to “The Washington Post”, banning assault weapons will not reduce crime. It will only lead to banning of guns. In the post, they state, “It 's only real justification  not to reduce crime, but to make the ownership of weapons to the public less.” By making the ownership of weapons less, the crime rate will most likely decrease, individuals will feel more comfortable walking out-side.

Read More
1303 Words | 6 Pages

The use of lethal force proves lawful, but only the means and methods of warfare are necessary to accomplish the military advantage. Plus, Article 41(2) protects a person who “expresses an intention to surrender,” or “has been rendered unconscious or otherwise incapacitated by wounds or sickness.” An International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) report explains, “if a combatant can be put out of action by taking him prison, he should not be injured; if he can be put out of action by injury, he should not be killed.” In addition, NATO’s Policy on Non-Lethal

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

The lack of standards with the Missouri Basin Project, the disregard of the proper rules of conduct with the San Francisco Bay Simulated Attack with biological weapons, and the lack of moral principles in OPERATION UPSHOT-KNOTHOLE resulted in dangerous and/or deadly consequences. In all three cases, the cause of is unethical judgment/behavior with the vehicle of M&S use in T&E. Some would argue that there are protocols in effect today to govern the use of M&S in T&E but there were also protocols within above three instances that were ignored by Government and Military Leaders who made their successful careers by following rules and regulations. M&S in T&E is far too dangerous and has the potential to cause further harm if continued.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Military grade weapons are made for one reason and one reason only—to kill human beings. There is no reason for ordinary people to have access to this type of weaponry, especially semi-automatic rifles. More weapons, especially more semi-automatic weapons, does not mean less crime; semi-automatic weapons are not convenient for personal protection, and banning these weapons could help lower the number of mass shootings that occur in this country today. In 2016 alone, approximately 39,000 Americans were killed by guns, most of these deaths were caused by semi-automatic weapons (Lopez).

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

An overview of the countries civilian considerations

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

The field of autonomous weapons has become so advanced that it has been “described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms” (“Autonomous”). Weapons that could operate without human surveillance or distant operation have been a thing of fiction for over a century, and they are now within a handful of years before becoming reality. However, people hope that one day “Autonomous weapons select and engage targets without human intervention,” but that is far from reality because autonomous drones are constantly under human supervision and pilots to take over when needed. Considering that only a couple decades ago this technology was thought to be impossible, it has made leaps and bounds in the weapons industry; still striking awe into the faces of those who are introduced to

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

The recent technological developments and military operational demands are leading to increasing levels of autonomous weapons systems Autonomous weapons have been used in military operations. There are three categories of autonomous weapons: in the loop, on the loop, or off the loop. We mainly use in the loop and on the loop because they both need humans to operate the machines. However, off the loop is fully autonomous weapons. A fully autonomous weapon is one that can independently detect and attack targets without the need for humans.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

Nations can control their weapons and would only use them to go to war. They can use them whenever they want and it 's all up to the government to use them. They don 't have to ask the people if they have to use them, they will just launch them whenever

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Regulation Of Autonomous Weapons

Related Topics

Open Document