Pros And Cons Of The Subversive Kingdom Model

537 Words3 Pages

I defend the counter system/subversive kingdom model over the alternative presented based on biblical questions (Snyder, 2011). The first question to consider is if the model affirms God’s sovereignty? The subversive model claims God’s sovereignty opposed to the utopian model that least stresses this note and some other version deny God’s supreme power (Snyder, 2011). Second, does the model stress that the kingdom of God is historical and not some story (Snyder, 2011)? Yes, some versions of the counter system model stress the historical nature of the kingdom, however models one, two, three, and four do not highlight the historical nature of God's kingdom (Snyder, 2011). Third, do the models emphasize the promises of God kingdom that include: new social order, …show more content…

Fourth, does the model highlight that the kingdom of God faces opposition (Snyder,2011)? The issue of God’s kingdom facing opposition is less emphasized in models five through eight, and present in models one, two, and three (Snyder, 2011). The fifth question to consider is, does the model stress that the church is not the kingdom, but it is called to be the kingdom community? Model four, the ecclesiastical model does not affirm that the church is to be the kingdom community, it identifies the church as the kingdom of God (Snyder, 2011). However, the subversive kingdom accents this point of view (Snyder, 2011). Sixth, does the model stress the need for repentance, faith, and obedience to enter the kingdom of God (Snyder, 2011)? The models that do not stress this point include future hope, institutional church, political state, Christianized culture, and utopia (Snyder, 2011). However, the subversive kingdom model does stress repentance, faith and obedience as a requirement to enter the kingdom of