Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

1626 Words7 Pages

The United States Constitution has created much debate since the moment it was conscripted. It has been argued that Constitution of the United States is a document that was drafted in response to the evolution of society. Others have argued that the creation of the Constitution was made as an effort to create a strong national government that was capable of exercising real authority and preservation of ideals in the revolution. The American Constitution is seen as being reactionary because the founders of the Constitution wanted to react to change in restoration of the previous state. The U.S. Constitution is considered reactionary because one should consider the events, documents, and people who participated in the era of the Constitution. …show more content…

Colonies had originally agreed on state institutions that were centered around national government structures. In response to many believing that central governments should be weak and each state remaining a sovereign nation, the ideas of The Articles of Confederation were created (Brinkley 125). The Articles of Confederation provided for a national government which was like one that was in place already before British independence. The Articles of Confederation failed for four reasons, the first reason was that they did not grant the national government power to tax (The Challenge of Democracy 58). Meaning that there was no income to pay for things like war and to carry on affairs of the new nation. Second was the articles made no provision to direct the government, meaning the president was simply just an officer of the congress. The colonists therefore feared the re-establishment of monarchy, but it left the nation without a leader (The Challenge of Democracy 58). Third, the articles did not allow the national government to regulate interstate and foreign commerce (The Challenge of Democracy 58). Last, the articles did not succeed because they could not be amended without a complete agreement of congress (The Challenge of Democracy 58). This eventually framed the writings of the Constitution. The delegates unanimously agreed to debate the proposal called the Virginia Plan, after reading it they almost immediately rejected the idea of amending The Articles of Confederation, but instead they decided to use it and create a whole entirely new Constitution (The Challenge of Democracy 60). This is a big contributor to one of the main reasons why the Constitution is