ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

632 Words3 Pages

I feel that the US Constitution is somewhat outdated, and is in need of a revision. As everybody knows, the world has changed a lot in the past 250 years. These changes are things like transportation, total number of people in the world, and major things like the internet and technology. The events and problems that the Constitution solved years ago are a lot different than the problems that we face today. However, some of the more universal and basic rules of the constitution should not be subject to change because they still apply to today. One major thing that would happen if we were to create a totally new constitution is that there would be major disputes between everybody in the country. When the constitution was written, it was meant to help unite people with the same, uniform law that people thought would be good for the development of the country. But, when it comes to writing a new one in the 21st century, there would be too many arguments and people not complying with others. A major Amendment that would get argued over would be the second because now, we have assault rifles instead of muskets, and people don’t feel safe with others carrying firearms. Therefore, I feel like the Bill of Rights should be kept untouched, because it forms the basic …show more content…

Some think that there should be someone in charge to specifically be Commander in Chief of the army and navy, and not just the president. Back in the day when the Constitution was written, it made sense to make the President Commander in Chief because the President at the time was George Washington, and he was a fantastically skilled in what he did when he was in charge of the Continental army during the revolutionary war. But now that war is different and a lot more complex, I feel that the Commander in Chief should be separate from the

Show More
Related
221 Words | 1 Pages

The United States should adopt the Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation. The new Constitution provides many advantages and new opportunities. First, the Constitution gives more power to the national government in many ways. For example, under the Articles the national government had to ask the states for money, but under the Constitution the government is provided with money and the power to tax. In addition, the Articles allowed states to regulate trade causing each state to tax one another's products.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

Back in the early days of independant America there had been an ethical dilemma on whether or not they should ratify The U.S constitution. The main two arguments were whether citizens chose to maintain the status quo, or switch to a more centralized government. The two debates were backed up by James madison who wrote the Federalist No.10 for ratification and Patrick Henry who gave a speech against it. In the document James warns about how “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.” referring to someone or a group of people who could possibly create unique factions between on another and disrupt a potential republic.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

At the time that the Constitutional Convention took place, the North was industrialized and produced many finished goods. The South, however, still had an agricultural economy. Therefore, the South imported many finished goods from Britain. The North wanted the government to be able to impose import tariffs or taxes on finished products. They wanted this to help protect against foreign competition and encourage the South to buy goods made in the North.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia, on May 25, 1787. Most of the delegates were from the upper classes of American society. The most famous delegate, George Washington, was “unanimously elected president” of the Convention (Cassel, 1994. P. 119). Originally, the delegates intended to revise the Articles, however their debates resulted in a whole new constitution.

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

The composers of the U.S. Constitution needed to empower government activity; the designers of the Texas Constitution needed to incapacitate government activity. While the U.S. Constitution makes a unitary official that packs official power in the president, the Texas Constitution makes a plural official that scatters official power over numerous chose workplaces, along these lines dividing the official branch of government and averting control over the official branch from gathering in any one individual or office. One purpose of intrigue, be that as it may, concern the CEO's energy to veto bills go by the governing body. The detail veto in the Texas Constitution permits the senator to veto particular things contained inside apportionments

Read More
1626 Words | 7 Pages

The United States Constitution has created much debate since the moment it was conscripted. It has been argued that Constitution of the United States is a document that was drafted in response to the evolution of society. Others have argued that the creation of the Constitution was made as an effort to create a strong national government that was capable of exercising real authority and preservation of ideals in the revolution. The American Constitution is seen as being reactionary because the founders of the Constitution wanted to react to change in restoration of the previous state. The U.S. Constitution is considered reactionary because one should consider the events, documents, and people who participated in the era of the Constitution.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

The need for a commander-in-chief can be seen in times of war, when immediate action must be taken. The checks written out in the Constitution limit the ability of the President to receive too much power. The Judicial Branch is tasked with examine the Constitution and deciding how it should be applied to the average

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

If the Constitution was not supported by the majority of states, numerous problem would occur. The constitution was made to solve problems caused by the articles of confederation and by receiving the nation. The Articles of Confederation had some positives aspects of it but generally it lacked any power. If the Constitution was not ratified, the nation would still be possibly dealing with issues such as taxation, slavery and unity.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Ever since the Constitution was written, chaos has ensued. The states have split into two sides: the Anti-federalists, who oppose the Constitution, and the Federalists, who support the Constitution—both of whom have argued in writings, such as the Federalist Papers. Anti-federalists rightfully believe that a president has enough power to become a tyrant, similar to British kings in the past. Therefore, they request for a Bill of Rights to be added, ensuring that the citizens have power in government as well, in order for them to ratify the Constitution. The Anti-federalists are supported by Virginia, New York, Rhode Island, North Carolina, and Massachusetts, while the Federalists are prominent in Georgia, South Carolina, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey,

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

Even though the Articles have some major flaws, the Constitution should not be approved because of its own dangers it brings. For one, we Americans just spent years fighting for our independence from Britain due to the unfair treatment inflicted Britain’s strong government. If we approve the Constitution, our own central government would become much stronger, and potentially we could end up in the same situation once again. Additionally, we broke away from Britain because many people disliked the idea of a King in charge. Under the Constitution, a president would be elected and given four years of rule; in this long period of time, a president could easily take his power and authority over the army to unfairy govern the States, lead us into

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

The United States Constitution is a remarkable document. A daring experimentation in democracy, in which it has proved both solid and adjustable enough to survive 230 years and remain operative in a world different from the one in which it was written. The United States Constitution, officially took place on September 17, 1787, in which it established America’s national government and foundational laws. The charter guaranteed essential rights for its citizens. It was signed at the Second Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

On the other hand the judicial review has become too powerful. This power has allowed for the constitution to be changed in terms of its meaning without physically changing on the document. This was the case when the supreme court judges what is to be considered ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment under the 8th amendment, and this could reinforce the judgment that the 8th amendment and the constitution in general doesn’t work affectively and no longer applies to modern America. Nonetheless the simple fact remains that the current constitution has survived over 200 years and continues to serve its purpose to an extent affectively, after surviving two world wars, a civil war, riots and civil disorders.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

My opinion is why change the constitution. It is basic and easy to follow and Americans have been using this system for a long period of time and its intentions were to be used for centuries. The constitution has kept our country together since it was created and gives individual a basic set of laws that gives them freedom that shouldn’t be changing every year or decade. Changing the amendments undermines the fundamental procedure that the country was created for. Who obtains mass knowledge that has the ability to know what to change in the constitution to make the country better?

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document