Back in the early days of independant America there had been an ethical dilemma on whether or not they should ratify The U.S constitution. The main two arguments were whether citizens chose to maintain the status quo, or switch to a more centralized government. The two debates were backed up by James madison who wrote the Federalist No.10 for ratification and Patrick Henry who gave a speech against it. In the document James warns about how “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.” referring to someone or a group of people who could possibly create unique factions between on another and disrupt a potential republic.
At the time that the Constitutional Convention took place, the North was industrialized and produced many finished goods. The South, however, still had an agricultural economy. Therefore, the South imported many finished goods from Britain. The North wanted the government to be able to impose import tariffs or taxes on finished products. They wanted this to help protect against foreign competition and encourage the South to buy goods made in the North.
1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.
Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?
1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.
The young nation, barely three years old, was dying. Ten years after the Declaration of Independence, America was struggling to hold itself together. The Articles of Confederation, designed during the Revolution, demolished even the inkling of monarchy by forcing the national government to abide by the whim of the states. During the Revolutionary War the states held together out of necessity, but after the war, the states became hostile to their neighbors. It quickly became evident that a serious crisis has settled upon the United States.
The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia, on May 25, 1787. Most of the delegates were from the upper classes of American society. The most famous delegate, George Washington, was “unanimously elected president” of the Convention (Cassel, 1994. P. 119). Originally, the delegates intended to revise the Articles, however their debates resulted in a whole new constitution.
The Constitutional Convention took place from May 25th to September 17th, 1787, in the state of Pennsylvania. The Convention was created to revise the Articles of Confederation, and to create a new government. There were many disputes that presented themselves during the Convention, the major arguments being: Federalist vs. Anti-Federalists, Large State vs. Small State, Slavery, and One vs. Multiple Leaders. One debate was versus the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
The colonies that currently compose the British claims in North America are forced to make a decision. We have been under the oppressive rule of Europe for too long. Our minor claims for self-rule and independence have seemingly been laughed at by our English counterparts, and without decisive action we will remain stagnant in our goals. Although there are flaws in the currently proposed constitution, we must accept what we have written and continue to work towards a more perfect union. The currently proposed constitution has come from months of progress and many meetings of The Constitutional Convention.
The new constitution couldn’t please everyone. Some people liked it but some didn't. The two sides were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, whereas the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. They would have debates about ratifying the Constitution.
The government of the United States of America had its infrastructure set in stone in the span of the year 1787 (National Constitution Center, n.d.) when this country’s founding fathers put their futures into their own hands and laid down various ground rules for the government to follow by constructing the United States Constitution. Among the words written in the U.S. Constitution, Articles I, II, and III records the given powers of the United States Congress, President, and the three branches of the national government, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. These rules give many abilities to these parts of the government, but there are also restrictions given to them as well. Through the United States Constitution, the Congress is given
Ever since the Constitution was written, chaos has ensued. The states have split into two sides: the Anti-federalists, who oppose the Constitution, and the Federalists, who support the Constitution—both of whom have argued in writings, such as the Federalist Papers. Anti-federalists rightfully believe that a president has enough power to become a tyrant, similar to British kings in the past. Therefore, they request for a Bill of Rights to be added, ensuring that the citizens have power in government as well, in order for them to ratify the Constitution. The Anti-federalists are supported by Virginia, New York, Rhode Island, North Carolina, and Massachusetts, while the Federalists are prominent in Georgia, South Carolina, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey,
I feel that the US Constitution is somewhat outdated, and is in need of a revision. As everybody knows, the world has changed a lot in the past 250 years. These changes are things like transportation, total number of people in the world, and major things like the internet and technology. The events and problems that the Constitution solved years ago are a lot different than the problems that we face today. However, some of the more universal and basic rules of the constitution should not be subject to change because they still apply to today.
The United States Constitution is a remarkable document. A daring experimentation in democracy, in which it has proved both solid and adjustable enough to survive 230 years and remain operative in a world different from the one in which it was written. The United States Constitution, officially took place on September 17, 1787, in which it established America’s national government and foundational laws. The charter guaranteed essential rights for its citizens. It was signed at the Second Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia.
The second Battle of Copenhagen took place in from August 16, 1807 to September 5, 1807. The Battle of Copenhagen was a British assault of Denmark’s capital, Copenhagen, to try and capture the Dano-Norwegian fleet. The Battle of Copenhagen took place during the Napoleonic Wars. Even though Denmark was defeated in the first Battle of Copenhagen, it still maintained a considerable navy. During the battle, Britain was concerned that Napoleon might force Denmark to close the Baltic Sea by rallying French troops to the island of Zealand. The British knew that access to the Baltic was essential for trade and raw materials for building and maintaining warships.
