ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

538 Words3 Pages

Ever since the Constitution was written, chaos has ensued. The states have split into two sides: the Anti-federalists, who oppose the Constitution, and the Federalists, who support the Constitution—both of whom have argued in writings, such as the Federalist Papers. Anti-federalists rightfully believe that a president has enough power to become a tyrant, similar to British kings in the past. Therefore, they request for a Bill of Rights to be added, ensuring that the citizens have power in government as well, in order for them to ratify the Constitution. The Anti-federalists are supported by Virginia, New York, Rhode Island, North Carolina, and Massachusetts, while the Federalists are prominent in Georgia, South Carolina, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, …show more content…

How can we be sure that what happened in the past with British tyranny will not occur again? Checks and balances will be enforced, but the other branches can abuse their power as well. Those who are governed bear an innate right for a voice in government; thus, the states should harbor more power than the national government. Though the Articles of Confederation did have issues, it at least granted and addressed our rights; the Constitution must not diminish our rights and learn from the Articles. The US Anti-federalists, considering what happened in the past, have justified reasons for not ratifying the Constitution unless a Bill of Rights is added, which will prevent a corrupt government and protect our rights. The Federalists have argued in favor of the Constitution, stating that this Constitution will do good for our country. And although this Constitution does provide a basis for our country, it has scarce mention of the people, much like the British government. Citizens are a vital aspect of the country that cannot just be

Open Document