ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Torture

753 Words4 Pages

Torture and its small chance of success
1. Torture is justifiable but only in the most extreme cases. Michael Levin has strong argument supporting this. He sees the need to use torture as a balance between saving innocent lives and what you have to do to be able to save them. It’s a way to prevent disasters and saving valuable lives even if it means hurting the ones who endangered others.

2. Torture is one of the most controversial debates one can find. When we ask a group of people if it is a good or a bad thing there is almost in every case a close to fifty-fifty division of opinions. The biggest arguments on the pro side is that information can be more important than morals, but is it really the best method?

3. What is not so good in Levin’s argumentation is that it feels like he would resort to torture too quickly. There are many ways to break someone and to retrieve information from someone. Torture should be applied when it is to save lives, but before doing that the interrogation should start with breaking him psychologically through talking. Torture can be very ineffective; information retrieved from someone by torture is very unreliable. Torturing people from a terrorist organization can lead the organization to use that information to recruit more people. When a terrorist knows he could get tortured if he gets captured he will never surrender.

4. …show more content…

One can break another person psychologically without torturing him. The key to achieving effective interrogation without torture is talking to the person. You start of with getting to now the terrorist and try to convince him that both the terrorist and the interrogator can work together and get over the past. Establish a basis of trust and make him believe that they both have the same goal. Intellect should be the way to break someone. This can be a very effective and human way of interrogation and people should be trained to interrogate in this

Show More
Related
1694 Words | 7 Pages

Alan Dershowitz begins his article “ Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured” by questioning whether one person can be tortured to save the lives of many others. Dershowitz displays both sides of the argument before shifting the question. Dershowitz asserts that the question is not if torture should be used on a ticking bomb terrorist, rather the question is whether the torture is done openly under a legal framework or secretly and illegally. He then simplifies the conflict to the prioritization of values. While the argument that Dershowitz constructs seems to leave very little room for disagreement, there are ways in which to collapse his entire premise.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi, the preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement states “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” This is important because torture is brutal on the body and mind. The article “Torture’s Terrible Toll” by John McCain is more convincing then the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin because McCain provides more logical reasoning, he adds his own personal experience of being a captured prisoner during the Vietnam War, and he creates an emotional bond with people around the world. Through more logical reasoning McCain Argument is more valid than Levin.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

The Case for Torture Wins Torture is it morally acceptable? Many have debated this argument but I would like to bring up two main conflicting view points from Michael Levin, and Marzieh Ghisai. Michael Levin is a Jewish law professor who wrote The Case for Torture where he advocates where torture is acceptable in some circumstances.

Read More
313 Words | 2 Pages

Many people might think that torture is cruel, unacceptable and it does not show humanity. In contrast, Michael Levin says that implementing torture is needed to prevent future evil acts. In “The Case for Torture”, Michael Levin also makes it clear that there are situations in which torture is not merely acceptable but morally necessary. Levin argues that implementing torture to save people lives is morally right and reasonable. Levin’s purpose of his text is to let people know that there are times when torture becomes an option to save and protect innocent lives.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

The author believes that the thoughts of enlightened societies are unwise and ascertains that there are situations whereby torture becomes morally mandatory in dealing with terrorists.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Although torturing is considered wrong by many people today, I agree with Michael Levin that torture should be an option in certain situations because it could save the lives of American people. Levin says in his article “Torturing a terrorist unconstitutional? Probably. But millions of lives surely outweigh constitutionality (Levin 605).”

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

Applebaum has plenty of evidence to back up her claim that physical torture is not effective, and there are many other ways to obtain information. While the fear-encouraging and questioning elements are potent to many who are afraid of terror committed against them, but when the overwhelming sentiment of Levin’s argument is being compared to the logic and ethical points of Applebaum it is clear to see the superiority of her argument. Although Levin would advocate for physical torture in extreme situations, one must expect extreme consequences. Physical torture is rarely effective, violates rights, and damages a whole nation’s credibility. This is why physical torture should not be

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

In the reading “The Case for Torture” written by Michael Levin, and published on the June 7th, 1982 edition of Newsweek. Levin argues in favor of torture as an acceptable way of obtaining information when innocent lives are at stake. Outlining three separate scenarios devised to make the reader reconsider the stance on torturer in order to protect the interest of those in the western area. The strength of this text is that the absence of reasoning does not strike the reader; he is overcome by Levin’s ability to break ethical decisions down to black and white. Levin begins with describing torture as “morally mandatory”.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

In the face of terrorism, one of the most pressing moral issues is the use of torture as a means of extracting information. The essay, “The Case for Torture”, by philosopher Michael Levin, is a persuasive piece about the morality and validity of torture in dire situations. To persuade readers of his opinion, the writer incorporates a formal vocabulary to elevate his argument, an informal point of view to redirect readers’ moral compass, and an informal and formal tone to strip terrorists of their rights. Throughout his essay, Levin uses a formal vocabulary to give himself authority on speaking about a controversial topic such as torture. As most western democracies, the writer’s audience, outright ban torture and regard it as cruel, Levin

Read More
1032 Words | 5 Pages

2016). Similar to the arguments applied for the rights ethical framework, every human deserves equal treatment, whether it is the victim or the torturer. It is easy to minimize the direct effect that torturing someone has on the interrogator. In various cases, the torturer becomes the tortured as well (Boothe 2006, 25-26). The interrogator is mentally changed forever; the mental burden and imagery will be a constant reminder of his actions and will be detrimental to his life.

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

Elizabeth Collier Analyzing Figurative Language March 20, 2018 "Sketch" by Carl Sandburg is a short poem that describes ships on the shore and a rolling tide. This poem gives off a calming tone to support the theme of nature. Personifications and several metaphors also help bring out the theme for this writing.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

"Beyond Waterboarding: The Science Of Interrogation." New Scientist 205.2750 (2010): 40-43. Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Feb. 2016.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

Torture is an inhumane act that shouldn’t be tolerated and should be banned from any occasion not only because it’s bad, but also because it is immoral. The article, In Defense of the Absolute Prohibition of Torture, explains the flaws of the “ticking bomb” scenario. Jamie Mayerfeld states “People tend to over look the realness and exaggerate on the effectiveness of torture.” When people come to think of a scenario like the ticking bomb, they see thousands of lives being lost and believe that sacrificing one for thousands would be acceptable.

Read More
1809 Words | 8 Pages

The use of interrogating people through

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

Torture is universally prohibited in both national and International law worldwide. It is a fundamental violation of human rights that cannot be derogated from. Essentially, torture is said to constitute any physical and mental act by which severe pain or suffering is intentionally inflicted upon a person ( UNCAT).Torture is mainly used for purposes that are set out to degraded, embarrass, and induce destruction in the person being subjected to torture and those in close relation to the person being tortured .Torture is a mechanism used by those in authoritative positions to preserve themselves in power (Power, 2006:2). Despite the universal prohibition on torture, its use has been widespread throughout history, and especially of late in the wake of September 11 2001 and other recent terrorist atrocities to combat the aforementioned heinous terrorist attacks.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Torture

Related Topics

Open Document