ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

742 Words3 Pages

In the face of terrorism, one of the most pressing moral issues is the use of torture as a means of extracting information. The essay, “The Case for Torture”, by philosopher Michael Levin, is a persuasive piece about the morality and validity of torture in dire situations. To persuade readers of his opinion, the writer incorporates a formal vocabulary to elevate his argument, an informal point of view to redirect readers’ moral compass, and an informal and formal tone to strip terrorists of their rights. Throughout his essay, Levin uses a formal vocabulary to give himself authority on speaking about a controversial topic such as torture. As most western democracies, the writer’s audience, outright ban torture and regard it as cruel, Levin …show more content…

After questioning readers’ morals in an accusative manner, the writer answers his own question by suggesting that the only ethical resolution to the dilemma is to torture the terrorist, leading readers to believe that the writer has values similar as them, as torturing one is far more moral than letting millions die. In the following sentence, Levin uses a first person and second person point of view to persuade readers to let go of bias and listen to his arguments. By using two informal points of view, first person and second person, Levin sets readers up so that by discarding their previous beliefs about torture, they are more susceptible to Levin’s persuasive arguments and ultimately more likely to agree with his opinions. Later on near the end of his essay, Levin uses an informal and formal tone to persuade readers that terrorists renounce their rights and that society should stop them by whatever means necessary, including torture. Distinguishing terrorists from their victims, Levin implicitly states his opinion on the argument of whether terrorists have rights,

Show More
Related
699 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi, the preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement states “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” This is important because torture is brutal on the body and mind. The article “Torture’s Terrible Toll” by John McCain is more convincing then the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin because McCain provides more logical reasoning, he adds his own personal experience of being a captured prisoner during the Vietnam War, and he creates an emotional bond with people around the world. Through more logical reasoning McCain Argument is more valid than Levin.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

Marzieh Ghiasi is a female Muslim college student who wrote a rebuttal to Levin 's Case for Torture where she uses logic to deconstruct his argument and prove that torture is not an acceptable practice. Both of their papers are good arguments and have great points to support them, but ultimately, I would say that Levin’s argument on torture being morally acceptable is the better argument. Levin uses many examples and devices to fill his article with Pathos as Ghiasi has a Logos approach but doesn’t have very many devices throughout her article to support her argument. Levin uses many hyperbolic situations that he uses to explain when and why torture would be acceptable.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

In the essay, Security and Freedom (2023), author Eva Lindani, asserts that liberty should be prioritized over security and suggests that higher governments prioritizing the latter would be overstepping as citizens are capable of protecting themselves. She supported this claim by providing examples of past governments abusing power while framing it as a security measure. Her essay was written in hopes of persuading the audience to prefer liberty over security in order to create a balanced society by keeping the federal government out of local business. Moreover, Lindani’s tone seems as if she aimed for an audience that lacks trust in the government. The most effective strategy she uses to persuade the readers is by using a sensitive topic as

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

As the audience reads this article they get information about all the killing methods, and more it 's a really big website that can give you informations about most parts of the holocaust that 's the most interesting in my opinion is the killing evolution. People will learn so many different ways that they killed those people that the audience didn 't know about. This article’s audience could be anybody that 's doing a research paper on the holocaust or anything bc they give many facts about the holocaust and the ways they had it there. PBS published this article on their website with many different topics to choose from. The information copyright date was 2004-2005.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

In Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture”, he uses many cases of emotional appeal to persuade the reader that torture is necessary in extreme cases. There are many terms/statements that stick with the reader throughout the essay so that they will have more attachment to what is being said. Levin is particularly leaning to an audience based in the United States because he uses an allusion to reference an event that happened within the states and will better relate to the people that were impacted by it. The emotional appeals used in this essay are used for the purpose of persuading the reader to agree that in extreme instances torture is necessary and the United States should begin considering it as a tactic for future cases of extremity. One major eye catching factor of this essay is the repetitive use of words that imply certain stigmas.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

In Michael Levin's The Case for Torture, Levin provides an argument in which he discusses the significance of inflicting torture to perpetrators as a way of punishment. In his argument, he dispenses a critical approach into what he believes justifies torture in certain situations. Torture is assumed to be banned in our culture and the thought of it takes society back to the brutal ages. He argues that societies that are enlightened reject torture and the authoritative figure that engage in its application risk the displeasure of the United States. In his perspective, he provides instances in which wrongdoers put the lives of innocent people at risk and discusses the aspect of death and idealism.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

Has anyone ever heard of something extremely dangerous and life-threatening and thought that, “Hey, let’s try that!”? Would they still want to try it if they knew it was a form of torment? Christopher Hitchens decides to endure a torture technique called “waterboarding” to learn more of its use among Americans. In Hitchens’s Believe Me, It’s Torture, he describes his experience enduring “waterboarding” to discourage use of it in America with use of the persuasive techniques ethos and logos.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

No, matter where you are in the world, distractions are going to get to you, and it affects your primary focus and mission. Distractions keep you from doing your work and keep your mind drifting elsewhere with little side bars in your head. According to source one “Brain Interrupted” By Bob Sullivan and source two “The Censors” by Luisa Valenzuela, both are connected with hindrance among the effect technologies has on the human Brain and Juan retrieving his letter. So, with both Brain Interrupted and The Censors both sources prove that distraction can affect your train of thought or what you are doing in general, with Bob Sullivan he displays his point through technology and the effect it has on you, while Luisa Valenzuela profess her point through her fictional character Juan and how he got bewildered.

Read More
1681 Words | 7 Pages

Edmund Burke once said, “Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it” (“History Quotes” par. 23). There is something to be said about a civilization that does not analyze its past flaws to correct it future mistakes. By not studying the past, both the laudable and the unmentionable, there is no way for a person, country, or race of people to avoid making similar errors as a result of ignorance. Examining history provides each generation with the tools for it to construct its own values, opinions, and solutions to essential humanitarian, political, economic, and social problems. However, sometimes analyzing history is not enough, especially whenever its warnings are largely ignored or underestimated.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

While analyzing “The Torture Myth” and “The Case for Torture”, it is very clear to see the type of rhetorical appeals used to persuade the audience. Anne Applebaum, the writer of “The Torture Myth” --in context of the decision of electing a new Attorney General--would argue that torture is very seldomly effective, violates a person’s rights, and should be outlawed due to the irrational need upon which physical torture is used. On the other hand, Michael Levin strongly argues that physical torture is crucial to solving every imminent danger to civilians. Levin claims that if you don’t physically torture someone, you are being weak and want to allow innocent people to die over something that could have been simply done.

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

In the novel “1984” by George Orwell, the Inner Party uses cruelty in a politically and socially effective way by using methods such as torture, starvation, imprisonment, and room 101 as crucial motivation for those being tortured to not only confess but repent of their sins against the party. Furthermore, the use of cruelty by the Inner Party unveils both the victim and perpetrator’s inner conscience. The use of cruelty throughout “1984” by the Inner Party and O’Brien reveals how cruelty functions in the work as a means of oppression and a catalyst of subservience.

Read More
1398 Words | 6 Pages

The Chilean Coup Tragedy and the Shock Doctrine When thinking about making economic changes, what do you think of? Is it things like natural disaster? Times of crisis? Manipulation? Violence?

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

Morgan Poston Professor Wilson PHI 220 01 DT Ethics 20 November, 2015 We Tortured Some Folks…. Is it morally right to torture people? In a recent poll taken in over a half dozen countries it was found that there was a large amount of support for “justified torture” (Petersen). What this means is that a large portion of the worlds countries believe torture is acceptable in extreme situations. The ticking time bomb scenario is one of the most used arguments for torture (McCoy).

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

Torture, though it may never have a solid answer, is at times justified through morals or thought to be necessary. As a form of capital punishment, persecution is wrong because each human being not only has rights, but is unique and precious. In the perspective that cruelty happening to save the lives of other human beings, the question of whether torture is acceptable then is raised. The topic of torture can be seen in many various perspectives, but four of those include utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics, virtue ethics, and Christian-principle based ethics.

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

I. Introduction According to Mirko Bagaric and Julie Clarke (2005), “a rational examination of torture and a consideration of hypothetical (but realistic) cases show that torture is justifiable in order to prevent great harm.” I agree to the statement above as justifying torture will minimize future harm. But how does justifying torture minimize future harm? This essay will further breakdown the circumstances in which torture is justifiable.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

Related Topics

Open Document